If you had not been banned, I would continue that I did not reference my beliefs as right, and you're facts as wrong.

One of the two of us was being hypocritical, and only one of us has been banned.

(June 11, 2010 at 10:26 pm)Pippy Wrote: I didn't say every pres was atheist, I said every pres was fake. So the Christian pres's are fake Christians, and this so called Athiest candidate is likely a fake Atheist. Clearer this time?

What is a REAL atheist? The only requirement to call oneself a 'real' one is that you don't happen to believe in any gods or goddesses. I've seen every one of this guys videos, and trust me, he is a 'real' atheist. He was an ardent christian most of his life, until he started looking into a lot of the things he was told were true. He found they were not true.

It's you believers who usually have more than the basic requirement of believing in gods or goddesses. You have many qualifiers, such 'god is really love', or 'you are not doing it the right way cuz of...'. That's why there are so many religions and sects. Each goes beyond a simple belief in a creator. The creator now has properties and characteristics, and everyone is certain that they have a clearer understanding of it than anyone else.

An American presidential candidate (in this modern era) would find a way to be a fake atheist. That's how stinkin' fake the whole thing is.

(June 8, 2010 at 2:39 am)Pippy Wrote: The next president has already been chosen, although this guy might be able to be the designated loser....
The conspiracy that al quaeda hit the world train center is still a conspiracy, and the belief that there is no god is still very much a belief.

I hope you don't procreate. The world can't handle your winning genes.

---

(June 12, 2010 at 8:43 am)Scented Nectar Wrote:

(June 11, 2010 at 10:26 pm)Pippy Wrote: I didn't say every pres was atheist, I said every pres was fake. So the Christian pres's are fake Christians, and this so called Athiest candidate is likely a fake Atheist. Clearer this time?

What is a REAL atheist? The only requirement to call oneself a 'real' one is that you don't happen to believe in any gods or goddesses. I've seen every one of this guys videos, and trust me, he is a 'real' atheist. He was an ardent christian most of his life, until he started looking into a lot of the things he was told were true. He found they were not true.

It's you believers who usually have more than the basic requirement of believing in gods or goddesses. You have many qualifiers, such 'god is really love', or 'you are not doing it the right way cuz of...'. That's why there are so many religions and sects. Each goes beyond a simple belief in a creator. The creator now has properties and characteristics, and everyone is certain that they have a clearer understanding of it than anyone else.

I think you're new at this.

Pippy's a shithead and he says a lot of wacky stuff. Kind of like spam mail in your inbox. Just delete it and go along your way.

Me and Tav don't really see eye to eye, but he's an intelligent and worthwhile person regardless. Oh, snap.

(June 13, 2010 at 4:38 am)tavarish Wrote: I think you're new at this.

Yes, it's only been about 6 weeks or so since I got here. I am only just now starting to be able to separate the various believers from each other as to who's who and their belief differences. Pippy is now under the category of vaguely deistic conspiracist with a xtian bent. Possibly with a constant 'I'm a victim' undertone to everything (that goes with the conspiracy thing as an unwritten rule I think). Not necessarily a bad person, but those things are a sign that I might not be too successful in getting what I'm saying to be understood.

Can't help it though. I HAVE to say something anyways. Like diarrhea of the typing fingers, it just has to come out. And even though it doesn't do much in effect, I sure do feel better afterwards!

(June 13, 2010 at 8:47 am)Scented Nectar Wrote:

(June 13, 2010 at 4:38 am)tavarish Wrote: I think you're new at this.

Yes, it's only been about 6 weeks or so since I got here. I am only just now starting to be able to separate the various believers from each other as to who's who and their belief differences. Pippy is now under the category of vaguely deistic conspiracist with a xtian bent. Possibly with a constant 'I'm a victim' undertone to everything (that goes with the conspiracy thing as an unwritten rule I think). Not necessarily a bad person, but those things are a sign that I might not be too successful in getting what I'm saying to be understood.

Can't help it though. I HAVE to say something anyways. Like diarrhea of the typing fingers, it just has to come out. And even though it doesn't do much in effect, I sure do feel better afterwards!

(June 13, 2010 at 4:30 pm)tavarish Wrote:

My roommate just said 'that picture sounds like you', without knowing it was in response to a post of mine. It's me all right.

(June 13, 2010 at 7:37 pm)Scented Nectar Wrote: My roommate just said 'that picture sounds like you', without knowing it was in response to a post of mine. It's me all right.

Its all of us.

(June 10, 2010 at 9:45 am)Scented Nectar Wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_111dKHE_0M

And now he just lost my vote.

Puppies as a National Symbol? Whadda wimp.

Saddam's Iraq was a bully. If this wimp had his way Saddam would still be running amuck and most likely invaded Saudi Arabia next. America had it's history of passive neutrality. What happened? The world's bullies ran amuck. America became the big-kid on the block and fights the bullies who are tring to push around the rest of the world.
Does the rest of the civilized world really want the U.S. to pull all it's might back home and 'stay out of it' when the real bullies start carving up their lands? This girly man wants America to weaken it's might. Without strength America would be unable to come to the aid of those who need it.

Are their any here who thinks Saddam would not still be in control of Kuwait and possibly Saudi Arabia if America were to be as weak as this man proposes we should be?

Take the United States off of this list;
http://www.militarynewsnetwork.com/large...forces.htm
By number of active duty troops:
1. People's Republic of China 2,250,000
2. United States 1,452,000
3. India 1,325,000
4. Russian Federation 1,245,000
5. North Korea 1,106,000
6. Pakistan 700,000
7. South Korea 687,000
8. Turkey 617,000
9. Iran 545,000
10. Vietnam 484,000

And who do you have left? Does anyone here really want who's left to be the biggest bully on the block?
("Bully" being defined, as this character seems to be defining it, as "Strong Military")

And I do believe it is worthy to note when it comes to military expenditures;
Military expenditures as a percent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP)
1. Oman 11.40
2. Qatar 10.00
3. Saudi Arabia 10.00
4. Iraq 8.60
5. Jordan 8.60
6. Israel 7.30
7. Yemen 6.60
8. Armenia 6.50
9. Eritrea 6.30
10. Macedonia 6.00
25. China 4.30
28. United States 4.06
30. Russia 3.90
Source: CIA World Factbook