Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 1, 2024, 8:35 pm
Thread Rating:
Un-United Kingdom
|
I've been taking stupid pills to try and get down to your level.
RE: Un-United Kingdom
September 21, 2014 at 12:52 pm
(This post was last modified: September 21, 2014 at 12:53 pm by Noodly1.)
What does everyone think of the allegations of fraud during the count?
I am a sceptic and would love nothing more than these to be debunked, the second vid just does not sit well with me at all, a sealed box being opened and flat ballots already arranged into a neat pile when you have to fold them when putting them into the ballot box. (September 21, 2014 at 12:52 pm)Noodly1 Wrote: Exactly. To have one vote on something that can potentially threaten the national security of a sovereign nation, and then have said vote be counted with in the very government who is potentially under the knife only invites mistrust in those who loose the vote. Especially when the vote is so close.
There's always allegations of fraud in these things. Allegations, by themselves, don't prove wrongdoing; that's why police have to investigate them.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
RE: Un-United Kingdom
September 21, 2014 at 2:11 pm
(This post was last modified: September 21, 2014 at 2:18 pm by Chas.)
(September 19, 2014 at 12:53 am)Aractus Wrote:(September 18, 2014 at 1:29 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: If Scotland is no longer part of the UK then the UK will be known not to include Scotland. Where's the problem?Same problem they faced in 1919-1922 when the country was called "The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland". Except in 1707, it became the name of the nation that joined the crowns of England/Wales and Scotland. (September 19, 2014 at 1:23 am)Minimalist Wrote: Looks like you Brits are going to be stuck with them. They tried that once. Didn't work out. (September 20, 2014 at 7:08 am)Aractus Wrote:(September 20, 2014 at 4:25 am)jesus_wept Wrote: Scotland has a population of about 5.5 million, out of those about 3.6 million voted in the referendum. Which means, if my maybe is correct, about 29℅ of the population voted no. The rest either voted yes, didn't vote or were ineligible to vote.Yes, and you nearly highlighted the problem with optional voting. OK, so being required to vote is not a problem? Seems like something a totalitarian state would do. Those who "didn't vote" abstained - which they are free to do.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method. (September 21, 2014 at 12:52 pm)Noodly1 Wrote: What does everyone think of the allegations of fraud during the count? In any honest election there are always sore losers. Only in totally rigged elections where the winner gets 100% of the vote are all the sore losers shot before they can complain of irregularities.
As if the underhand and blatant tactics weren't bad enough lol. I'm very skeptical of the fraud allegations.
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)