Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 24, 2024, 1:31 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Human Eye: A Double Standard?
#51
RE: The Human Eye: A Double Standard?
Quote:I hope a lot of people watch it. Especially creationists
You'd have an easier time persuading cats to open a soup kitchen for mice...
[Image: rySLj1k.png]

If you have any serious concerns, are being harassed, or just need someone to talk to, feel free to contact me via PM
Reply
#52
RE: The Human Eye: A Double Standard?
(April 30, 2015 at 3:03 am)Godschild Wrote: God is so complex and pefect nothing could have designed Him.

GC

And there you have it.  Straight from the horse's ass.
Reply
#53
RE: The Human Eye: A Double Standard?
(April 30, 2015 at 6:53 pm)Minimalist Wrote:
(April 30, 2015 at 3:03 am)Godschild Wrote: God is so complex and pefect nothing could have designed Him.

GC

And there you have it.  Straight from the horse's ass.

Honestly, I'm thinking if the horse himself does exist he's gonna be cracking the sky asunder any minute to fix the stupid unleashed.
It's now or never God. You have 24 hours to amaze me. Don't say I'm not fair.
[Image: rySLj1k.png]

If you have any serious concerns, are being harassed, or just need someone to talk to, feel free to contact me via PM
Reply
#54
RE: The Human Eye: A Double Standard?
(April 30, 2015 at 6:53 pm)Minimalist Wrote:
(April 30, 2015 at 3:03 am)Godschild Wrote: God is so complex and pefect nothing could have designed Him.

GC

And there you have it.  Straight from the horse's ass.
That's odd because most theistic philosophers argue that god is a simple being. Either GC doesn't know his apologetics or he realizes how stupid the simplicity claim actually is in the context of theism. But if god is complex then he's just sawed off his own legs, which usually take the route that complexity infers an intelligent designer.
He who loves God cannot endeavour that God should love him in return - Baruch Spinoza
Reply
#55
RE: The Human Eye: A Double Standard?
(April 30, 2015 at 6:51 pm)Iroscato Wrote:
Quote:I hope a lot of people watch it.  Especially creationists
You'd have an easier time persuading cats to open a soup kitchen for mice...

Well, I have a program of training cats to make soup and...  I realize there is some ambiguity in the word "hope," but I want them to watch it, but do not expect it.  It is also good for people to see who wish to argue with creationists.  It helps if they have some understanding of the eye, and primitive eyes, so they can explain how such an imperfect and faulty thing could evolve instead of being created by a perfect being.

"A wise man ... proportions his belief to the evidence."
— David Hume, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Section X, Part I.
Reply
#56
RE: The Human Eye: A Double Standard?
Imperfect, indeed. God is such a prick for making me wear glasses.
I mean, the rampant and unrelenting genocide and slavery over thousands of years is another couple of ticks against him, but let's keep things grounded here.
[Image: rySLj1k.png]

If you have any serious concerns, are being harassed, or just need someone to talk to, feel free to contact me via PM
Reply
#57
RE: The Human Eye: A Double Standard?
Quote:Either GC doesn't know his apologetics

He just makes it up as he goes along.
Reply
#58
RE: The Human Eye: A Double Standard?
(April 30, 2015 at 7:02 pm)Minimalist Wrote:
Quote:Either GC doesn't know his apologetics

He just makes it up as he goes along.

He's not even fun. He's tiresome. How do you make crazy tiresome? I must bottle his secret and make my fortune!!
[Image: rySLj1k.png]

If you have any serious concerns, are being harassed, or just need someone to talk to, feel free to contact me via PM
Reply
#59
RE: The Human Eye: A Double Standard?
(April 30, 2015 at 3:03 am)Godschild Wrote: God is so complex and pefect nothing could have designed Him.

GC


So if things needs to be designed to exist, then God doesn't exist. But if things don't need to be designed to exist, even if a perfect undesigned God exists, there is still absolutely no reason why nature must have been designed by anyone, least of all God.
Reply
#60
RE: The Human Eye: A Double Standard?
(April 30, 2015 at 3:59 pm)Pyrrho Wrote:
(April 30, 2015 at 3:03 am)Godschild Wrote: God is so complex and pefect nothing could have designed Him.

GC

So you reject the idea that complexity requires a designer.

plus perfection. The two leave no room for a designer.

GC
God loves those who believe and those who do not and the same goes for me, you have no choice in this matter. That puts the matter of total free will to rest.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  New Revised Standard Version Bible has Dead Sea Scroll input ?!?! vorlon13 17 4337 February 20, 2017 at 5:16 pm
Last Post: vorlon13
  Shouldn't there be more Christians with eye patches? BrokenQuill92 33 8546 February 2, 2014 at 9:57 am
Last Post: Tonus
  Tired of xtians prattling on about their "eye-witness" testimony? Minimalist 22 11132 April 27, 2012 at 1:21 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Is God’s justice close to an eye for an eye? Greatest I am 14 8386 January 15, 2012 at 10:14 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  God did it! Statistical miracle! 6 double-yolk eggs in a row. (not a miracle, BBC) Anymouse 1 2147 December 10, 2011 at 3:10 am
Last Post: TheDarkestOfAngels



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)