Posts: 15452
Threads: 147
Joined: June 15, 2015
Reputation:
88
RE: atheism and children
August 6, 2015 at 6:10 pm
(August 6, 2015 at 6:03 pm)Tartarus Sauce Wrote: (August 6, 2015 at 5:58 pm)Javaman Wrote: The content of her various posts, IMO, contradict your description of her participation.
I'm pretty sure if you go back far enough, that whole squabble between you and her originated from a direct question leveled at her about her beliefs. I can assure you she has no interest in forcing her beliefs on you.
Thank you.
You are right.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
Posts: 446
Threads: 1
Joined: January 20, 2013
Reputation:
8
RE: atheism and children
August 6, 2015 at 6:11 pm
(August 6, 2015 at 5:54 pm)Tartarus Sauce Wrote: (August 6, 2015 at 5:47 pm)pool Wrote: The fact that you would say that you don't care one bit if a bunch of random people on the internet thinks your beliefs are valid or not gives the impression that you weren't here to discuss the merit of your beliefs but rather to force feed them to others.Guess what?It tastes very much bitter.
Edit:
Also,i'm not eating it.Do you have any sweets? :3
You clearly haven't read any of the threads C_L has made. She's made it explicitly clear through both her words and actions from day one that her reason for being here is to listen, yes listen, to the standpoints of us atheists because she is genuinely curious about our opinions. "Force-feeding" us her beliefs is the antithesis of her purpose for being here, she only shares her beliefs when directly asked about them.
Sorry, this is a DISCUSSION forum, it isn't a presentation for people who don't want to participate.
There is nothing demonstrably true that religion can provide mankind that cannot be achieved as well or better through secular means.
Bitch at my blog! Follow me on Twitter! Subscribe to my YouTube channel!
Posts: 13122
Threads: 130
Joined: October 18, 2014
Reputation:
55
RE: atheism and children
August 6, 2015 at 6:12 pm
(August 6, 2015 at 5:47 pm)pool Wrote: The fact that you would say that you don't care one bit if a bunch of random people on the internet thinks your beliefs are valid or not gives the impression that you weren't here to discuss the merit of your beliefs but rather to force feed them to others.Guess what?It tastes very much bitter.
Edit:
Also,i'm not eating it.Do you have any sweets? :3
As Javaman said, force feeding is something Randy or Drich do. It's not what CL does, since she only holds her position. You may not agree with that position, but that's what a discussion board is about.
Posts: 13122
Threads: 130
Joined: October 18, 2014
Reputation:
55
RE: atheism and children
August 6, 2015 at 6:12 pm
(This post was last modified: August 6, 2015 at 6:26 pm by abaris.)
Double - delete
Posts: 15452
Threads: 147
Joined: June 15, 2015
Reputation:
88
RE: atheism and children
August 6, 2015 at 6:16 pm
(August 6, 2015 at 6:11 pm)Cephus Wrote: (August 6, 2015 at 5:54 pm)Tartarus Sauce Wrote: You clearly haven't read any of the threads C_L has made. She's made it explicitly clear through both her words and actions from day one that her reason for being here is to listen, yes listen, to the standpoints of us atheists because she is genuinely curious about our opinions. "Force-feeding" us her beliefs is the antithesis of her purpose for being here, she only shares her beliefs when directly asked about them.
Sorry, this is a DISCUSSION forum, it isn't a presentation for people who don't want to participate.
Lol, I suppose in that case a mod can ban me if she/he sees fit.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
Posts: 15452
Threads: 147
Joined: June 15, 2015
Reputation:
88
RE: atheism and children
August 6, 2015 at 6:20 pm
(August 6, 2015 at 6:03 pm)Tartarus Sauce Wrote: (August 6, 2015 at 5:58 pm)Javaman Wrote: The content of her various posts, IMO, contradict your description of her participation.
I'm pretty sure if you go back far enough, that whole squabble between you and her originated from a direct question leveled at her about her beliefs. I can assure you she has no interest in forcing her beliefs on you.
Post #62, to be exact. Thanks again for backing me up.
http://atheistforums.org/thread-35259-page-7.html
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
Posts: 176
Threads: 1
Joined: August 14, 2011
Reputation:
6
RE: atheism and children
August 6, 2015 at 6:20 pm
(August 6, 2015 at 6:03 pm)Tartarus Sauce Wrote: (August 6, 2015 at 5:58 pm)Javaman Wrote: The content of her various posts, IMO, contradict your description of her participation.
I'm pretty sure if you go back far enough, that whole squabble between you and her originated from a direct question leveled at her about her beliefs. I can assure you she has no interest in forcing her beliefs on you.
No. The squabble has more to do with her arrogant, insulting, and condescending comments.
Her beliefs, as she has presented them, are so ridiculous that it's pretty much impossible to be genuinely upset by them. But it's hard to completely ignore her insulting and condescending comments.
I'm also very disappointed by her weak attempts to deflect and prevaricate. I feel her methods of discussion have been deceptive and willfully obtuse.
Trying to reframe the ongoing discussion as my failure to appreciate her genuine intent to "share her beliiefs" is entirely unimpressive.
But knock yourself out.
Sporadic poster
Posts: 7392
Threads: 53
Joined: January 15, 2015
Reputation:
88
RE: atheism and children
August 6, 2015 at 6:28 pm
Trouble with children is that they are so immature.
Posts: 5356
Threads: 178
Joined: June 28, 2015
Reputation:
35
RE: atheism and children
August 6, 2015 at 6:29 pm
No need to attack CL ):<
The only reason i went on meanie mode was because it made me angry because of how you referred to babies as.I love babies.They're cute and cuddly and i like to play with them.
Don't even have to refer to them as "Rape babies" or "IVF babies",who cares anyway?At the end of the day they are all babies and God loves all his children no matter what.Also,they're cute.So that's what we should do as well,love the children of God no matter what.So love each other.
Also,god is a reasonable man,he'd understand because - population explosion and free will.
God would want what is ultimately good for his children,he just happened to write the book of rules in a very ancient time(when it was kind of expected for people to reproduce so that people wouldn't go extinct or something),so it kind of becomes our responsibility to mend the rules in such a way that it would be most pleasing for God and the current society so that we don't cause discomfort to anyone and generally make everyone feel good!
Posts: 13122
Threads: 130
Joined: October 18, 2014
Reputation:
55
RE: atheism and children
August 6, 2015 at 6:30 pm
(August 6, 2015 at 6:28 pm)I_am_not_mafia Wrote: Trouble with children is that they are so immature.
And loud. Without any sense for harmonics. And never, never let them sing. It's awful. Only enjoyable for parents since they're biased.
|