Miracle

[paulpablo]

That means you think that in ancient time there were people who had the information about stars similar to what general people have in today’s world even though ancient did not have the telescopes and advanced techniques of calculations.

I never made any statements about general people in todays world.  You were asking a question about what I personally know about stars, I don't know any advanced calculations or techniques involving stars.
You asked if I agree with the statement that there are things obvious to me that aren't obvious to ancient people, Ok I agree with that.
You then said I know what stars are but to ancient people it was not obvious what they were looking at.
I told you I don't actually know that much about stars, I have been told within my lifetime exactly what stars are made from and what they are but I'm not an astronomer or anything like that so I don't use information about stars enough in my life to be able to have taken the information on board.
I probably know more about the distance stars are from earth than ancient people, and that they are bigger than the earth.
I know they aren't missiles used to launch at devils like the quran describes.
But as far as constellations and the different stars of the night sky an ancient Egyptian or sailor probably knew how to use the stars for navigation more than me.
I'm not trying to be awkward when answering this question I'm just simply saying there are somethings they knew that I don't know about stars and some things I know they didn't know.
I don't see how any of this involves the quran stating that stars are used to launch against devils.

[paulpablo]

You are trying to dramatize a common sense idea. Not heart, not big toe, and not donkey feel the pain of burning other than the person who is going through that burning experience.

“The Muslims are like a single person. IF HIS EYE IS IN PAIN, HIS WHOLE BODY IS IN PAIN, AND IF HIS HEAD IS IN PAIN, HIS WHOLE BODY IS IN PAIN."

Hadith 6589
Chapter 17
Book 45 (Nurturing Ties and Manners)
Sahih Muslim
Volume 6
Translated by:
Nasiruddin al-Khattab

No I'm simply saying that the quran doesn't mention which part of the body is responsible for the actual punishment of pain, what actually senses the punishment of pain is the brain.
The verse of the quran still makes sense if the heart is responsible for sensing pain.  The quran verse does nothing to contradict any ancient idea of pain reception.

[paulpablo]

The quran doesn't exclude the heart being a central organ responsible for the sensation of pain, it doesn't say the heart doesn't sense that the skin is burned, it doesn't say the brain does sense the skin is burned, it simply says the skin is burned and it will cause pain.

If the heart WAS responsible for the sensation of pain the quran verse would still be totally 100% correct wouldn't it?

Not at all. Man’s words always are influenced by the popular concepts. However, Quran does not reflect any popular idea of its time rather by giving skin a preference over the heart it had challenged all popular concepts concerning pain caused by burning skin.

Ok because of this response of yours I think you don't understand what it means that ancient people thought the heart was responsible for the sensation of pain.  I don't think you're fully aware, you show a total lack of understanding. 

I could be wrong, to clarify if you do or don't understand what it means can you -please go more in depth about what you think it means?  What does it mean that ancient people thought the heart was responsible for the sensation of pain?  How exactly did they think it worked?

[paulpablo]

Simply quote the verses with the phrase “SENT DOWN” and I will show you how I know the meaning of those verses.

Any of the verses that include the phrase sent down, take your pick from any of them.  There are some that are talking about quails, books, prophets.

[Harris]

Oh, I give up, -must- have been magic.  Guess what.....still don't care, still not joining your club.  Satisfied?

The purpose of my writings is to convey the true message by way of Logical, Rational and Conceivable reasoning. If you take heed and modify your life style in compliance with the truth then good for you, otherwise you are the owner of your choice.

For instance, is there any reality in the concept of “Nothingness.” Do you really think that extremely complex yet orderly structures in nature, which are controlled by different forces with extreme precisions, are nothing but a matter of chance? Is human conscious and intelligence, one of the most complex phenomenon in the universe, came out from nowhere.

To me chance and nothingness are no more than absurd and self-deceiving ideas.

So you want evidence that the Quran is not divinely inspired? Ok, the evidence is your very shoddy and poorly reasoned argument as to why it is, coupled with the complete and utter lack of evidence to support the claims you are making.

Perhaps, I am the only person who is giving authentic historical and scientific references along with my arguments and justifications. You guys are rejecting Quran based on mere speculations. Only saying Quran is a comic book is not adequate.

RE-read bold part. There is no reason to believe anything you are positing based on the (little to no) evidence you have given.

Everything you have posited thus far is ignored for this reason alone.

I'm with Rhythm. No reason to join your club based on what you've said.

You seem to be a well educated person. Tell me what is better:

“(Little to no) evidence” or
No evidence at all

And the Quran doesn't show a deep understanding of scientific facts, either.

Sure, if a law book gives reference to some scientific fact then the purpose of that reference is to augment the meaning of “LAW.” That reference do not serve to provide in depth understanding on that scientific reference, for that there are science books.

First of all, this idea was in the Old Testament, maybe 1000 years before the Quran. Second, it is not a scientific idea, but a statement of observable reality. Also, clay doesn't turn into sperm, there's a lot more to it than that. Important details are missing, and now you say. . . wait for it. . . "Yeahbut the Quran is not a science text book."

Quran teaches us that all following books are the word of God:

Zabur (Psalms) the holy book given to Prophet Dawud (David),
Tawrat (Torah) the holy book given to Prophet Musa (Moses),
Injil (Gospel) the Holy book given to Prophet Isa (Jesus), and
Quran the Holy book given to Prophet Mohammad

As being a Muslim, I trust and believe in the untouched and uncorrupted sections of all above mentioned books.

Regarding clay, think about the food that all living beings are consuming. This food whether in form of herbs or flesh is the product of soil and water. Look at the chemistry of human body and you will realise that all the elements of human body in fact are similar to the elements found in soil and water. We are not getting something unusual from the heavens that is nurturing our bodies rather we are consuming soil and water in different organic forms and when we die we go back to that same soil and turn out to be soil after sometime.

Look at any number of mythologies, and they talking about how something comes from nothing, then grows into even more. Unless you know WHY the Quran writers said that, you do not know that they are talking about the expanding of the universe as we know it, or just the idea that God has the capacity to make stuff.

No man has the capacity of making stuff out of oblivion.

The verses of Quran are clear and precise in their literal meanings. Previously, the verses, which were thought to be ambiguous, turned out to be vibrant and clear to human understanding as advancements in science revealed hidden facts of nature.

I do not know any mythology, which points to some present world scientific fact that was not known only 200 years back in time. In case you know such a mythology then I would really appreciate if you share this valuable knowledge with everyone.

I can't speak for anyone who has access to Western education but chooses a fairy tale for their world view. Maybe they weren't paying attention in science class, or didn't go on to university and study 1st-year logic?

I think you have no idea in what number people are accepting Islam. Moreover, they are people from all walks of life.

As for logic, is there any better logic than:

• There is nothing called “Nothingness”
• There is nothing called “Chance”
• There is nothing without a “Cause”

Perhaps, it is time for you to recheck your logic.

I don't need to deeply study history to tell you that anybody with eyes can see that where a river joins the ocean, you can see a line between the two patches of color. I've seen it myself, and I have to assume that desert people like the prophet Mohammed weren't as stupid and uneducated as you keep insisting they are.

Prophet Mohammad and most of his contemporaries were illiterate but not stupid. They were humble and intelligent because after realizing the truth they had not rejected it arrogantly only for the sake of their social status.

People have eyes and they can observe things, no doubt. Point of my argument is, without having any hints people cannot develop sophisticated scientific concepts like Expanding Universe. They need special scientific aid to make such observations and exactly to that technical aid, ancient people had no access.

Yes, anyone can see the difference between two patches of colour. However, for such observation you have to have two patches of colour.

Have you any idea how big Arabian Desert is? Do you know Saudi Arabia is 15th largest country in the world by area, which is part of Arabian Desert? Do you know there is no river in the whole of Arabian Desert that may fall into some sea and cause Halocline?

Trust me, even if you deeply study not only the Arabian history but also history of the world, you will not find any record that may even resemble to halocline.

I don't find the words Big Bang anywhere in the Quran. What I find are relatively ambiguous statements that you choose to insist mean the Big Bang.

What other meaning can you give to the following verse?

“Do not the Unbelievers see that the heavens and the earth were joined together (as one unit of creation), before we clove them asunder? … ”
Al Anbiyaa' (21)
-Verse 30-

No. You haven't established that they knew the universe is expanding.

I have never said, “Ancient people knew about Expanding Universe.” You are saying this.

As for the darkness of the ocean, I'm surprised by your lack of life experience. If you go into the ocean and dive just a couple meters down, you can instantly discover that the ocean is dark. I mean, seriously. Just go swimming and fucking look down. It's dark down there.

Why only Quran is mentioning about that darkness and about deep ocean currents? Why not anyone else?

You have to first prove they were actually talking about the expansion of the physical universe, not just a metaphor for God creating a bunch of stuff. But you can't, because you take a single line of scripture, and add a hundred lines of metacommentary and interpretation.

Alright then, give your version of commentary to the following verse.

“With power and skill did We construct the Firmament: for it is We Who create the vastness of pace.”
Adz-Dzaariya (51)
-Verse 47-PM Find

Remember, at the time when Yusuf Ali was translating this verse, Hubble was unaware about this scientific fact.

1) The quran is not mentioning that it is NECESSARY, it says that they may taste the penalty.


If I say I am opening a door so that I may leave the house, I am not saying that it is essential, needed to be done so that I can leave my house.

If I say it is necessary for me to open a door in order to leave the house I'm saying that it is essential, needed to be done.

I am opening a door so that I may leave my house, but I may also smash through a window and get out that way, I might climb through a hole in the wall or dig a tunnel out of the house, I MAY do many things in order to leave the house.

So the quran is giving no specific information, it is basically saying its going to burn the skin repeatedly as a form of punishment.  So that they may feel the torment.

The quran is not saying anything about what is necessary in order to feel pain.

The only information given is that burning skin causes pain.

“Burning skin causes pain” is sufficient information for a rational person to avoid fire at any price. Clever person is the one who saves himself from the hellfire.

2) As we already discussed this is just one of the many methods people could feel punishment, other organs also have pain receptors.

I totally agree!

I don't understand why you're uncomfortable answering a question that only requires a simple yes or no.   Do you think people in ancient times would have EXPERIENCED 3rd or 4th degree burns.

I did NOT ask the question would they have understood 3rd degree burns, the degrees of burns is just a term we are using in order to communicate with each other.

I could just as easily ask, do you believe ancient people experienced severe enough burns to cause nerve damage?

It doesn't matter if they knew what nerves were or not.

Remember we are talking about the quran?  That was the topic wasn't it?  The quran doesn't mention degrees of burns or nerve damage or anything but you seem to think the quran mentions the symptoms of 3rd degree/severe burns.

So I'm asking you a simple question, do you think ancient people experienced the symptoms of 3rd degree burns?  Yes or no will be fine, I don't need an in depth answer.

In simple words Quran is saying when people’s skin would be roasted in hellfire, God will give them new skins so they continue feeling the punishment.

Why there would be a need to replace skin because burnt skin does not feel the pain. In this short verse, God has encompassed complete science of skin.

Bringing my sledge hammer to a pillow fight again I suppose...

Clearly Harris has no answer on how to fast anywhere other than the Earth. Muhammad didn't know people would be needed to fast in space otherwise there would be Iyaht or Hadith address the topic. Allah, for some reason, didn't foresee this. The Quran even says Allah created humans to be weak and yet it is left up to weak humans to retrofit the Quran.

You have structured your argument totally based upon speculations and conspiracies what most anti-Islam sites are propagating.

Before he gets Prophet Hood at the age of 40, Prophet Mohammad did not know how to perform Islamic prayer. He did not know how one should pray in normal circumstances and indeed, he did not know how one should pray in an abnormal situation.

Quran and Hadith has covered all possible circumstances, which a person may face at the time of prayer.

1. To perform AsSalat (one of five daily prayers) first condition is ablution i.e. to wash certain parts of body with water according to the instructions given in Quran and Hadith.

You do not need to be in space to face a deficiency of water. There are plentiful situations on earth when people may not have access to water or they cannot use water due to some health issues. In such situations, people can perform Tayammum.

“O ye who believe! Approach not prayers with a mind befogged, until ye can understand all that ye say,- nor in a state of ceremonial impurity (Except when travelling on the road), until after washing your whole body. If ye are ill, or on a journey, or one of you cometh from offices of nature, or ye have been in contact with women, and ye find no water, then take for yourselves clean sand or earth, and rub therewith your faces and hands. For Allah doth blot out sins and forgive again and again.”
An Nisaa (4)
-Verse 43-

Tayammum can be performed on uncontaminated piece of earth like:

• Earth (fine or compacted)
• Sand
• Lump of dry clay
• Pebbles or stone not mineral or precious stones

2. Second condition of the prayer is to face Kaaba in Mecca. God commanded in Quran:

“From whencesoever Thou startest forth, turn Thy face in the direction of the sacred Mosque; that is indeed the truth from the Lord. And Allah is not unmindful of what ye do.”
Al Baqarah (2)
-Verse 149-

Again, there are many circumstances when people may not find right direction of Kaaba. This situation implies mostly to those who are in a travel or arrived at some unfamiliar place.

In case, a person unintentionally turns his face in a direction other than the Kaaba and prays then his prayer is valid. If a person cannot face Kaaba because he is travelling in a train, aeroplane, or spacecraft then he should face in the direction of Kaaba according to his best estimations and physical possibilities.

“To Allah belong the east and the West: Whithersoever ye turn, there is the presence of Allah. For Allah is all-Pervading, all-Knowing.”
Al Baqarah (2)
-Verse 115-

3. Third obligation is to follow right time of prayers, which people can judge by looking at different positions of the sun. However, many places in the world are such where people cannot orient right time of the prayer. For example, people living near the poles are similar to people who are in space, as both of them cannot fix time of their prayers.

Muslim community have a common consensus on the ruling of prayer times pertinent to such situations. In the polar region, a Muslim can synchronize his prayer time with the prayer time in the nearest region where proper sunrise and sunset happens on daily basis or he can synchronize his prayer time with the prayer time in Mecca.

This rules is equally viable for people who wants to pray in space.

4. Fourth obligation is to perform prayer in a way that Prophet Mohammad had shown:

Prophet Mohammad said:
“Pray as you have seen me praying.”
Hadith No.604
Sahih Al-Bukhari Vol.1

A single prayer has many cycles of bowing down and prostrations. However, many people due to old age or due to some health issues are not able to perform these physical actions or a person may maybe in a situation where it is impossible for him to bowing down or prostrate. For example, a person cannot prostrate in zero gravity. In such situations, people can pray while standing, sitting and even lying by signs and gestures.

“Men who celebrate the praises of Allah, standing, sitting, and lying down on their sides, and contemplate the (wonders of) creation in the heavens and the earth, (With the thought): "Our Lord! not for naught Hast Thou created (all) this! Glory to Thee! Give us salvation from the penalty of the Fire.”
Ali Imran (3)
-Verse 191-

God has no intention to put human into a hardship.

“On no soul doth Allah Place a burden greater than it can bear…”
Al Baqarah (2)
-Verse 286-

One of the purpose of prayer is to bring people to righteousness and to a modest way of living.

“It is not righteousness that ye turn your faces Towards east or West; but it is righteousness- to believe in Allah and the Last Day, and the Angels, and the Book, and the Messengers; to spend of your substance, out of love for Him, for your kin, for orphans, for the needy, for the wayfarer, for those who ask, and for the ransom of slaves; to be steadfast in prayer, and practice regular charity; to fulfil the contracts which ye have made; and to be firm and patient, in pain (or suffering) and adversity, and throughout all periods of panic. Such are the people of truth, the Allah-fearing.”
Al Baqarah (2)
-Verse 177-

If someone prays for showing himself as a pious person and through it to seek some material benefit then that person is an infidel hypocrite who is living for the quest of his desires.

“The Hypocrites - they think they are over-reaching Allah, but He will over- reach them: When they stand up to prayer, they stand without earnestness, to be seen of men, but little do they hold Allah in remembrance;”
An Nisaa (4)
-Verse 142-

• Also, the embryo does not cling to anything, in floats in the womb.

WRONG! This statement alone is more than sufficient to expose you as a lair or the one who literally have no knowledge about embryology.

http://study.com/academy/lesson/the-plac...ction.html

• An embryo does not look like "chewed flesh". This is an insult to the intelligence.
• Does not look like a clot either.

Better, you watch what top scientists in the field of Embryology have to say about Embryology in Quran. Their work on Embryology is highly acknowledged throughout the world, translated in several languages, and many universities and colleges have adopted their work as textbooks for their students. Please pay attention to every single word of these highly acclaimed scientists.

Unfortunately, video quality is poor.

https://vimeo.com/65748594

P. Z. Myers may speculate few deceiving ideas by twisting and distorting realities. That is his maximum limit because practicality, he has no evidences to support his claims.

Show this video to P. Z. Myers and ask him to negate the facts, which these eminent embryologists have shown to the world.

All verse translations below are Abullah Yusuf Ali.

I have another problem with the Quran and this is historical, not scientific. The Quran claims that Mecca is thousands of years old, the first settlement on Earth even:

3:96 Lo! the first Sanctuary appointed for mankind was that at Becca, a blessed place, a guidance to the peoples;

2:127 And when Abraham and Ishmael were raising the foundations of the House, (Abraham prayed): Our Lord! Accept from us (this duty). Lo! Thou, only Thou, art the Hearer, the Knower.

How can this be demonstrated archeologically?

You would need to prove that Abraham existed and show that people have been visiting Mecca from the time of Abraham all the way to the time of Muhammad. We would expect to see lots of evidence for human activity around the site of the Masjid al-Haram since ancient times, but we do not.

There are many sites on the internet, which are claiming,

“The Archaeological Evidence for the Bible is Non-Existent”
“There is no Archaeological Evidence for the Exodus”
“How Archaeology Disproves Biblical History”
“There is NO Archaeological Evidence for the Book of Mormon”
Etc.

And now:

“There is No Archaeological Evidence that Abraham had built Kaaba” or
“There is No Archaeological Evidence that Abraham had ever existed.”

Each site is giving such a long-winded justifications that may easily swirl the head of a first time reader.

Age of TIMAEUS is around 2500 years and the age of GOSPEL is about 2000 years. People like you are fighting and proving that Bible is a fictitious literature because there is no archaeological evidences for its existence whereas the same people respect and give honour to TIMAEUS, which is much older than Gospel and has no archaeological evidences as well. So why double standards.  

Well, let me add my version to this list by saying:

“THERE IS NO ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVIDENCE FOR THE EXISTENCE OF ARISTOTLE, PLATO, AND SOCRATES THEREFORE, THEY ARE FICTITIOUS CHARACTERS”

Does all that make sense to you? If yes, then go ahead, prove that Aristotle, Plato, and Socrates are not fictitious characters, and bring your ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVIDENCES to support this idea.

You are not playing with a full deck.

Next, there are verses that appears to contradict Tawheed. The Holy Spirit isn't something expect from Allah as the Quran is a rejection of Christianity and people have all sort of wonderful arguments against the Trinity. They say the Christian god isn't one and yet Allah has a Holy Spirit too:

97:4 Therein come down the angels and the Spirit by Allah's permission, on every errand:
If we look at the Tafsir for 97:4 we see Al-Jalalayn agrees with my analysis.

12:87 "O my sons! go ye and enquire about Joseph and his brother, and never give up hope of Allah's Soothing Mercy: truly no one despairs of Allah's Soothing Mercy, except those who have no faith."

It's not clear in the Yusuf Ali translation but Al-Jalalayn agrees that Iyah 12:87 is referring to the Spirit of Allah:
http://www.quranx.com/Tafsirs/12.87

Read following translations of (12:87) which are sufficient to give a clear perception to this verse and eliminate the need of additional commentaries:

Sahih International
O my sons, go and find out about Joseph and his brother and despair not of relief from Allah. Indeed, no one despairs of relief from Allah except the disbelieving people."

Muhsin Khan
"O my sons! Go you and enquire about Yusuf (Joseph) and his brother, and never give up hope of Allah's Mercy. Certainly no one despairs of Allah's Mercy, except the people who disbelieve."  

Shakir
O my sons! Go and inquire respecting Yusuf and his brother, and despair not of Allah's mercy; surely none despairs of Allah's mercy except the unbelieving people.

Dr. Ghali
O my sons, go and inquire (Literally: grope, probe) about Yusuf and his brother, and do not despair of relief from Allah; surely none despairs of relief from Allah except the disbelieving people."

As you can see, this verse is not talking about Holy Spirit but about not losing Hope in God. Hope and Spirit are different concepts.

Quran 25:53 is also scientifically inaccurate:

It is He Who has let free the two bodies of flowing water: One palatable and sweet, and the other salt and bitter; yet has He made a barrier between them, a partition that is forbidden to be passed.

Stopspamming addresses the dishonesty surrounding this Iyaht beautifully and mixes fresh and salt water together, something anybody can try out at home.

Oh, WOW! I did not know you are Richard Dawkins.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q2IEvykdCpQ

"miracles" what things that happen 1 in a million times? it might happen 7000 times today.

record all the seriously sick people in a hospital for five years. Assign a proper probability function that describes the likely hood of said events. The following year make a prediction on how many you might see in the next two years. It's a bell curve thong.

We deploy statistics sometimes to describe repeating events that we are not sure what the mechanism is causing the event we see.
Anti-logical Fallacies of Ambiguity

You cannot give any rational reason on how modern scientific facts become part of 7th century Quran and this is a miracle of Quran.

I never made any statements about general people in todays world.  You were asking a question about what I personally know about stars, I don't know any advanced calculations or techniques involving stars.

You asked if I agree with the statement that there are things obvious to me that aren't obvious to ancient people, Ok I agree with that.

You then said I know what stars are but to ancient people it was not obvious what they were looking at.

I told you I don't actually know that much about stars, I have been told within my lifetime exactly what stars are made from and what they are but I'm not an astronomer or anything like that so I don't use information about stars enough in my life to be able to have taken the information on board.

I probably know more about the distance stars are from earth than ancient people, and that they are bigger than the earth.

I know they aren't missiles used to launch at devils like the Quran describes.

But as far as constellations and the different stars of the night sky an ancient Egyptian or sailor probably knew how to use the stars for navigation more than me.

I'm not trying to be awkward when answering this question I'm just simply saying there are somethings they knew that I don't know about stars and some things I know they didn't know.

I don't see how any of this involves the Quran stating that stars are used to launch against devils.

Al Mulk (67) -Verse 5-
There is not much to add, just that the scientific nature of what God is referring to may be something which is not yet known to man - a number of the scientific miracles in the Quran were not known or understood until recently, so think of how many more facts people would realize with time.

No I'm simply saying that the quran doesn't mention which part of the body is responsible for the actual punishment of pain, what actually senses the punishment of pain is the brain.

Brain is an interpreter, which interprets sensory data into some kind of mind language. Without skin, it cannot generate sensory data on its own. Therefore, skin is responsible for the burning sensation not the brain.

The verse of the quran still makes sense if the heart is responsible for sensing pain.  The quran verse does nothing to contradict any ancient idea of pain reception.

You can associate any presumption with this verse for the sake of enhancing your understanding but that would not affect the literal meaning until you literally change the wording of the verse. The literal meaning is complete and there is no loophole in this verse.

The quran doesn't exclude the heart being a central organ responsible for the sensation of pain, it doesn't say the heart doesn't sense that the skin is burned, it doesn't say the brain does sense the skin is burned, it simply says the skin is burned and it will cause pain.

If the heart WAS responsible for the sensation of pain the quran verse would still be totally 100% correct wouldn't it?

Your “IF” does not mean, that is the case. The verse give full augmentation to the word SKIN by the use of words like “roasted through,” “change,” and “new” and is not mistaken in showing that sense of burning is in the skin itself.

Ok because of this response of yours I think you don't understand what it means that ancient people thought the heart was responsible for the sensation of pain.  I don't think you're fully aware, you show a total lack of understanding.  

I could be wrong, to clarify if you do or don't understand what it means can you -please go more in depth about what you think it means?  What does it mean that ancient people thought the heart was responsible for the sensation of pain?  How exactly did they think it worked?

If you want to elaborate on why you think I did not understand then please proceed. Otherwise, I am not fond of riddles.

Any of the verses that include the phrase sent down, take your pick from any of them.  There are some that are talking about quails, books, prophets.

Well, Sorry! Here I will not cooperate with you because initial query is yours.

[ReptilianPeon]

Ignoring that bigot accusation...

Muslim community have a common consensus on the ruling of prayer times pertinent to such situations. In the polar region, a Muslim can synchronize his prayer time with the prayer time in the nearest region where proper sunrise and sunset happens on daily basis or he can synchronize his prayer time with the prayer time in Mecca.

You claim there is consensus, but there is not. According to Abdur Raheem Green, a well known Fascist and Da'i, people who claim that you can use Meccan prayer times (if you do not live in Mecca) "should not be taken seriously" and "there is no basis for this claim":
At 44:40 in the video, during the question and answer portion.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ANG6q50OvoA

So, in the words of one of the best known Da'i, Harris talking rubbish... See, nobody can agree on how to interpret the Quran and Hadith, hence we have different Jurisprudence and denominations. Allah did not tell humans whose Quran interpretation is the right one.

In regard to embryology, Keith Moore is a loon. Nothing more to add. He is an opportunist and he has been given lots of fake awards and titles by Dawah sites in order to make him appear like a more important scientist than he actually is.

Anyhow you can find videos in this handy playlist I have linked, where most of the scientists who attended the conference at King Abdulaziz University inform watchers that they were deceived and quote mined. None of the scientists who attended the Shiekh's conference actually believe the Quran is miraculous. Keith Moor is absent because he is a noob.

Top scientists comment on the Quran YouTube Playlist
Featuring:
William Hay
Alfred Kroner
Tom Armstrong
Pete Palmer
Who explain how they were deceived by the Saudis.

Well, let me add my version to this list by saying:


“THERE IS NO ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVIDENCE FOR THE EXISTENCE OF ARISTOTLE, PLATO, AND SOCRATES THEREFORE, THEY ARE FICTITIOUS CHARACTERS”

Does all that make sense to you? If yes, then go ahead, prove that Aristotle, Plato, and Socrates are not fictitious characters, and bring your ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVIDENCES to support this idea.

I don't base my world view around these people so doesn't matter to me if I can't prove the existence of the people you listed. However, if we're going to play that game, there is more evidence for them than there is for a Mecca that is several thousand years old, as the Quran claims. We would expect a wealth of evidence supporting the Quran given that it's the truth. Yet Mecca was empty only a couple of hundred years before Muhammad came along.

The Quran is making a claim that Mecca is really old and we'd expect that if people have been going on pilgrimage there for thousands of years, like the Quran claims, we'd see evidence, such as human belongings or bodies (e.g. a burial site). I'm not asking for evidence for individual people, but of a trend of going for pilgrimage to Mecca between the time of Abraham and the time of Muhammad.

I can go further. The Quran also claims "waves the size of mountains" in relation to Noah's flood, suggesting it was global:
11:42
"So the Ark floated with them on the waves (towering) like mountains, and Noah called out to his son, who had separated himself (from the rest): "O my son! embark with us, and be not with the unbelievers!"

Yet civilizations in Arabia at the time of the supposed flood continue as normal, as if the flood had never happened. Some claim it was a local flood described in the Quran, but just how local is "local"? Local is a purely subjective term which means different things to different people. If it was local then people could simply avoid the flood.

But wasn't the intention of the flood Allah being upset at flawed creation? So Allah took away the free will of the flood victims and then after the flood let the world return to its flawed state. What a waste of human life! Speaking of Allah hating people, Allah must really hate all the starving Africans:
39:52 "Know they not that Allah enlarges the provision or restricts it, for any He pleases? Verily, in this are Signs for those who believe!"

Why doesn't Allah give everyone the food they require instead of hurting them? But of course, it doesn't actually matter if people are starving because we will hopefully seem them in Jannah. Life is just a temporary state before Jannah, so it doesn't matter if there are wars or hunger.

In regard to Spirit of Allah, how did you determine that the translators you listed had a better understanding than that Abdullah Yusuf Ali? We can both play this game. I could list Quran translators that suit my argument at the time, but I chose to remain consistent and always use Abdullah Yusuf Ali.

Regardless, there is no way am I using Sahih International. It's really dishonest translation, as I showed, here, in the topic titled "Newer Quran translations". It's a post science in the Quran narrative translation, hence the Saudis have translated it with certain biases. I'm not going to take a translation that forces the word "sperm" into the text of the Quran seriously.

And the others are just obscure translations. And Muhsin Khan translation was sponsored by the Saudi establishment, who obviously have and agenda and want to continue what Abdul Waahab started. Abdul Waahab was such a noob. He went around Arabia destroying historical sites.

In regard to fresh water and salt water not mixing:

The Quran is not saying "in this specific example fresh water and salt water do not mix". The Quran claims fresh and salt water NEVER mix because it says Allah "created a barrier between fresh and salt water" not "in this particular place in the Arctic you will find a place where fresh and salt water do not mix because Allah put a barrier there". Whenever it rains on an ocean fresh and salt water mix.

[bennyboy]

Sure, if a law book gives reference to some scientific fact then the purpose of that reference is to augment the meaning of “LAW.” That reference do not serve to provide in depth understanding on that scientific reference, for that there are science books.

Except the things you quoted are references to observation, and to poor interpretations of them. . . there's no evidence that they are references to real science, or that God was requried in order for those interpretations to be made.

Regarding clay, think about the food that all living beings are consuming. This food whether in form of herbs or flesh is the product of soil and water. Look at the chemistry of human body and you will realise that all the elements of human body in fact are similar to the elements found in soil and water. We are not getting something unusual from the heavens that is nurturing our bodies rather we are consuming soil and water in different organic forms and when we die we go back to that same soil and turn out to be soil after sometime.

To say that clay turns into semen isn't science. At best, it shows an awareness that the body is sustained with materials from the Earth-- another easily-observable phenomenon.

I do not know any mythology, which points to some present world scientific fact that was not known only 200 years back in time. In case you know such a mythology then I would really appreciate if you share this valuable knowledge with everyone.

No, but they can all be INTERPRETED and spun to represent scientific fact if one is as willing to do so as you are.

As for logic, is there any better logic than:

• There is nothing called “Nothingness”
• There is nothing called “Chance”
• There is nothing without a “Cause”

Perhaps, it is time for you to recheck your logic.

"I don't know therefore Allah" is not a logical improvement.

Yes, anyone can see the difference between two patches of colour. However, for such observation you have to have two patches of colour.

Dude, seriously. Buy a couple bus tickets, go to the sea at the mouth of a river, and tell me what you see.

Have you any idea how big Arabian Desert is? Do you know Saudi Arabia is 15th largest country in the world by area, which is part of Arabian Desert? Do you know there is no river in the whole of Arabian Desert that may fall into some sea and cause Halocline?

Do you know that thousands of years before Muhammed was born, the Romans and Greeks had established links with Europe, Africa and Asia, and collected libraries full of information about the world? Do you know that people had the ability to travel? Do you know that Muhammed had language, and therefore had plenty of access to all kinds of knowledge outside the Arabian Desert?

“Do not the Unbelievers see that the heavens and the earth were joined together (as one unit of creation), before we clove them asunder? … ”
Al Anbiyaa' (21)
-Verse 30-

It's their way of saying that everything was made by God. This is not a surprising position for monotheists to take. It's also hopelessly imprecise and lacking any detail that could confirm that it represents a knowledge of the Big Bang or anything else that is scientific.

Why only Quran is mentioning about that darkness and about deep ocean currents? Why not anyone else?

Hmmm. . . maybe because millions of texts were burned in Alexandria and other places? Maybe because it's so obvious to anyone familiar with oceans that nobody bothered to make a point of it?

A lack of evidence that people knew about the obvious and easily-observable isn't really good support for the miraculous nature of the Quran. It is much better support for the nature of Time.

Alright then, give your version of commentary to the following verse.

“With power and skill did We construct the Firmament: for it is We Who create the vastness of pace.”
Adz-Dzaariya (51)
-Verse 47-PM Find

"God made everything, cuz he's the shizzit." Not science. Not a miracle.

[IATIA]

• There is nothing without a “Cause”

Your god had no cause, therefore, there your god does not exist.

[paulpablo]

“Burning skin causes pain” is sufficient information for a rational person to avoid fire at any price. Clever person is the one who saves himself from the hellfire.

Are you ignoring what I'm telling you and then just typing random words?  I said you're wrong, the quran does not mention anything is necessary in order to feel pain. And you're replying with this, which has nothing to do with what I just said.

If you say 2+2 = 5 and I correct you by saying it's 4, you can't just avoid the issue of you being wrong by saying "Well 4 is a pretty good number aswell."

[paulpablo]

In simple words Quran is saying when people’s skin would be roasted in hellfire, God will give them new skins so they continue feeling the punishment.

Why there would be a need to replace skin because burnt skin does not feel the pain. In this short verse, God has encompassed complete science of skin.

Avoiding the question again, for the 3rd time, do you think people in ancient times experienced the symptoms of 3rd degree burns?  And why is it taking you so long to answer a simple question?