RE: Criticizing Islam is racist?
November 3, 2015 at 6:42 pm
(This post was last modified: November 3, 2015 at 6:53 pm by MTL.)
(November 3, 2015 at 5:52 pm)Rhondazvous Wrote: I would not be the fool who tries to tell you who to trust and who not to trust. But for me I will not give credibility to people who follow a book that permits them to lie. People will lie anyway, but to worship a god that sanctions lying takes it to a whole nother level.
There is even a word for lying about one's faith: Taqiyya.. Of course individual Muslims are left to interpret what it means to be compelled But it is clear lying is permitted.
yes, Rhonda, I agree.
I dislike Islam and Christianity equally, but I must admit that nowhere in Christianity are you given "permission" to lie, under any circumstances. Christians would be cast to the lions rather than lie about their devotion to Christ just to save their own skins, because their trust in God to save them, either in this life or in the next, should be demonstrated.
But Taqiyya tacitly permits deceit in Islam....and that opens up a whole nother can of worms.
I get tired of repeating that I believe there are decent, moderate people in every religion.
What I am saying is that those decent, moderate people are basically cherry-picking their way through a religion that is actually quite violent and oppressive, and a religion that screams "RACIST!" if you dare point it out.
Cherry-picking is not okay.
I would never belong to a religion,
but if I was going to convert to Islam,
I'd be an extremist...because that's the only version of Islam that I really think honestly reflects what Islam is.
I grew up around "moderate" Christians...and when push came to shove,
many of them where not so very moderate, at all.
I despise Wesboro Baptist Church...but I give them credit for at least being consistent
in their criticism of Kim Davis' hypocrisy.
Same with Al Qaeda, who recently distanced themselves from ISIL:
Al Qaeda might be extremist nutjobs...but their extreme take on Islam seems at least more sincere
than the flagrantly-hypocritical, blatant thuggery of ISIL, who abduct and sell girls into sexual slavery.
If you are a god-fearing person and you are also a decent person,
then what I am saying is shit or get off the pot:
Either become a Deist or pick a religion that is at least more peaceful at its core, if you must pick one at all.
to me, moderate muslims and christians might be nice people, but they are kidding themselves.
and the unconscionable part is that they belong to religions that seek (unlike Judaism) to recruit...
...and pass off their unsubstantiated theories about god as if they are undisputed truths, to do so
...and then call me a bigot because I won't refrain for condemning their choice to be part of that religion,
as if their cherry-picking is actually laudable behavior.
I'm not calling them terrorists.
I have no issue with their race.
I am saying: shit or get off the pot. Own the fact that you want to belong to an evil religion, but not be associated with that evil
...and only for the not-very-good reason that you cherry-picked your way through the holy writ.
Own the fact that if your devotion to God was really sincere,
you'd question how legitimate that holy writ must be,
if it is so open to misinterpretation and abuse.
A truly Divine book would be impossible to misinterpret.
I would personally look in the mirror and ask myself if I can, in all honesty, believe this religion really serves God
...and do I owe it to my God to abandon this evil religion;
...or, if this religion DOES serve God...is this God worth serving?
I would ask myself if it is possible that perhaps I am merely adhering to this religion for the sake of my own comfort level?
Do I belong to the religion, for the purpose of serving God? or for the purpose of serving the Religion? (Or more truly, my own interests?)
And god-fearing people who think they can have the penny and the bun should not be able to duck out of the responsibility that goes with consenting to be part of a religion that does that.