Still don't think we need a wall?

[abaris]

Try thinking more. It does less damage than the crap you currently spew.

That's hard, I guess. The more I read from this guy, the more I get the impression, he's just your usual extremist scum. Subscribing to extreme rightwing sources for information and only defining himself by hating the ones who he thinks are beneath him.

I'm sorry, but my tolerance ends when I encounter a mindset that cost the majority of my extended family their lives. Scum, that's the only word I have for people like that. And yes, they are the ones I consider to be beneath me.

[I_am_not_mafia]

Why does that make a difference?

You spoke of crime in your home. Your home has nothing to do with this thread.

No I was pointing out that if there is someone with an AK47 breaking into your home then you won't care if they are an illegal immigrant or not. As you well know, Merkins can own assault rifles too.

Nowhere did I say that I was referring to another country. You are arguing that my post is irrelevant because you have no way of legitimately countering it.

[Chad32]

I think stricter gun laws will help better than a wall. Unless you want to put a wall around every house in America because people shoot each other all the time around here.

We don't need any help with it from illegals.

This problem has less to do with illegal immigration, and more to do with how easy it is to get a firearm in this country.

[abaris]

Once again, folks, you're debating a Breitbart story. Who knows if it really happened without a source that isn't pure propaganda. I've checked my share of Breitbart stories, the ones with a European connection, and they all turned out to be false or blown out of proportion. Most of them, mainly anti muslim agitation, came word for word from European extremist websites.

So, no. Breitbart isn't a media network. It's agitation at it's purest.

[brewer]

You really want a land border with Mexico similar to the border between N and S Korea? Only larger and more deadly? Cuz that is what it would take. Anything less would be a waste of time. Even that may be an exercise in futility.

[Divinity]

A wall is nothing more than a costly distraction to make people feel they've done something.

Mexico won't pay for the wall. Taxpayers will. And it'll do fuck all to stop people from being here illegally. It'll do fuck all to stop drug trade. And the wall isn't even fucking feasible in the first place.

[downbeatplumb]

All you non-wallers would change your mind if an illegal visited you with an AK.

You act as though there aren't any americans that have guns. I've heard there are one or two there already.

[Jackalope]

All you non-wallers would change your mind if an illegal visited you with an AK.

No, I wouldn't, because I understand that "anecdote" is not plural for data, and anecdotes make for shitty public policy.

P.S. Breitbart is pure agitprop.

[The Valkyrie]

I'm beginning to agree with KUSA on this one.

But I feel a wall isn't going far enough to deal with illegals.

I think pre-emptive airstrikes should be considered.  Possibly even a full scale military intervention.

[Jackalope]

Personally, I favor a moat, preferably one filled with crocodiles. Or sharks - sharks with frickin' laser beams attached to their heads.

Yeah, that would be awesome.