(May 6, 2016 at 12:04 am)SteelCurtain Wrote: Wasserman-Schultz would be the worst choice she could make, there is no way she picks her.Hillary already said that she's going to load up on women (the lesbian thing) so there's no way she will ever pick a black guy (the Arkansas red neck thing).
Boxer maybe, although if she's going for the all-female ticket, she should pick Elizabeth Warren to nab some of the less idiotic Bernie Bros.
Cory Booker for the diversity, likeability, and shore up the the moderate vote.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 12, 2024, 12:15 pm
Thread Rating:
|
Bernie Sanders for VP!
|
 
Not everyone's a racist homophobe like you are, WoG. She's a politician and clearly miles ahead of you in intelligence, and there are politics to be played here.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---  RE: Bernie Sanders for VP!
May 6, 2016 at 12:37 am
(This post was last modified: May 6, 2016 at 12:42 am by Sterben.)
(May 6, 2016 at 12:07 am)SteelCurtain Wrote:It would not bother me in anyway to have all female ticket, I'm talking about the masses here. We have come a long way in progression of American society, transgenders and gays have rights that have been long deserved. Woman have assumed powerful positions that were once only held men (CEO'S, congress, senators, mayors and other positions).(May 6, 2016 at 12:03 am)Sterben Wrote: I'm not being sexist ... To answer your question, it would be too soon for a all female ticket. Point One: there is still a lot of people who would view A all female ticket would be threatening to them. Point two: Hillery would need a male VP for the percentage of voters who are still somewhat traditional. Point Three: Dealing with non-progressive male world leaders, there is a lot of them out there that even female leaders like Angela Merkel has issues dealing with based on the fact there woman. The prospect of a all female ticket be great if the candidates were qualified. I did like your thoughts on Warren has a potential choice. This is a game of political chess, let's get a female president in office first so that way society can progress further, to the point to where a all female ticket would have a higher chance to succeed.
You still have not shown how two females on a ticket is any different than one female. You do realize we're talking liberals and moderates here, right? Why would an all female ticket be any more threatening than a female President? Those people who wouldn't vote for an all female ticket wouldn't vote for a female President in the first place. Those people are all squarely in the Trump camp. Point one and two are moot. The VP doesn't travel and do diplomacy, and Hillary was already Secretary of State, the nation's top diplomat, so that puts to rest point three.
The only downside with the liberal demographic and an all female ticket with the top candidates for Hillary's running mate is the lack of diversity. That's why Cory Booker would be perfect.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---  (May 6, 2016 at 12:47 am)SteelCurtain Wrote: You still have not shown how two females on a ticket is any different than one female. You do realize we're talking liberals and moderates here, right? Why would an all female ticket be any more threatening than a female President? Those people who wouldn't vote for an all female ticket wouldn't vote for a female President in the first place. Those people are all squarely in the Trump camp. Point one and two are moot. The VP doesn't travel and do diplomacy, and Hillary was already Secretary of State, the nation's top diplomat, so that puts to rest point three. Franklin's ghost murders a kitten every time someone refers to a Hillary fan as a liberal. 
Hmm. As long as it's not a kittencorn.
Hammy 
If it comes down to hillary and trump fuck it i'm not voting for shit head 1 or shit head 2.
Fuck it.
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today.
Code: <iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_comments=true&show_user=true&show_reposts=false&visual=true"></iframe> (May 6, 2016 at 1:06 pm)dyresand Wrote: If it comes down to hillary and trump fuck it i'm not voting for shit head 1 or shit head 2. From Pharyngula, PZ Myers's blog, today ![[Image: batmancommands.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=freethoughtblogs.com%2Fpharyngula%2Ffiles%2F2016%2F05%2Fbatmancommands.jpg)
How will we know, when the morning comes, we are still human? - 2D
Don't worry, my friend. If this be the end, then so shall it be. 
Yeah, I suppose the Supreme Court Justices TRUMP any other arguments. Pun intended.
I am not happy about it. I feel I will be forced to vote for Hilary, even though she is a horrible person, just because she will be more likely to nominate liberal, or at least centrist, judges. I don't even want to think about what the Supreme Court would look like after Trump finished with it. Scary thought.
“Eternity is a terrible thought. I mean, where's it going to end?”
― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
