Your lack of imagination is your defeat

[chimp3]

A little logic goes a little way.

[robvalue]

I just told you what proper science is. Peer review. Not making stuff up on your own.

Have you submitted anything for peer review Rik, ever?

If you're going to try and count posting on here as peer review, you've utterly failed in every possible way. There aren't even any results to look at, for a start.

[SofaKingHigh]

Rik seems to think you can establish facts just by making up your own definitions for words, or using informal meanings in a scientific context.

One day everyone has to bite the bullet and leave their bedroom. Check if all their imaginary explorations have any correlation with reality. The way you do that would be science. Proper science. Not the kind where you are your own peer review.

What is proper science Roberto?
I really wish you knew son.  

You still float in the fantasy idea that physical science is able to understand what is not physical.
You see a rock but you can not see the pulsating energy.
But don't worry too much mate.  

Most probably in the next few reincarnations you too will start to understand that energy and consciousness are the two sides of the same sheet and that nobody ever really died because
energy-consciousness can not be destroyed.
Believe me Rob.
That will be a very good news for people like you that thought that with the physical death is
all over.  

   

[Little Rik]

Actually this planet was very nice before some idiots screwed it up.
You never thought about that son, did you.  

"Imbecile"
I guess that's what you use as a header for your replies to make it seem like you're smarter than everybody else.

When is before? And what do you mean by nice? How was the state of this planet before it being screwed up? Who are the idiots who supposedly screwed up this planet? 

It certainly wasn't nice to humans; everything wanted to kill you to survive, from deadly plagues to ferocious animals. We ARE screwing it up with all the CO2 emissions, but that hasn't affected most people's lives, yet.

The world is full of evil, and it was full of evil before we even stood on this planet. It was never a nice place, we made it a bit nicer using technological advancement.(Building houses to shield us from animals, forming communities of houses to help each other, making food almost trivial to get for most people , making vaccines to protect us against plague...etc.)

That's why our lord  the Flying Spaghetti Moster (Parmesan be upon him) told us that mind-consciousness doesn't exist in this universe, but it exists in the infinite universe of Bool's heat. The place where are spiritual people get their very reliable information.

Confusion upon confusion son.  

Before you come down with all these guessing you should really try to understand what the implications
of free will are.
Free will act in two ways.
One is that you may be able to do good things for yourself and for other.
The next is that you may opt to do the opposite.
Unlike animals that only follow the instinct humans have also the free will.
Hatred, greed and all other bad things are there because of free will.
Nothing to do with God.
If your son once it grows up do bad things you are not responsible.
The same apply to God.
Only idiots believe that God is responsible for all nasty things in the world.  

[Little Rik]

I just told you what proper science is. Peer review. Not making stuff up on your own.

Have you submitted anything for peer review Rik, ever?

If you're going to try and count posting on here as peer review, you've utterly failed in every possible way. There aren't even any results to look at, for a start.

Roberto.  

Gee, I am so excited that an expert in science like you is here.
Look Rob, I always try to understand why the time differ so much among people and
in between good and bad time.
When People are happy the time goes very fast but when people suffer the time goes so slow.
Not only that but the conventional time dictated by our watch doesn't even follow good or bad time.
Please Roberto explain to me how science reconcile all this?  

[Lucanus]

[Little Rik]

---

---

Well done Luc anus.
I am going to nominate your post for the best vandalize attempt ever.  
In the meantime considering that my mate Roberto is unable to answer the question about
how science can reconcile the time differences would you help him in answer such an important question.
With your Uni studies it shouldn't be that difficult to answer.
A Nobel price under consideration son.  

[Alex K]

I just told you what proper science is. Peer review. Not making stuff up on your own.

Have you submitted anything for peer review Rik, ever?

If you're going to try and count posting on here as peer review, you've utterly failed in every possible way. There aren't even any results to look at, for a start.

Roberto.  

Gee, I am so excited that an expert in science like you is here.
Look Rob, I always try to understand why the time differ so much among people and
in between good and bad time.
When People are happy the time goes very fast but when people suffer the time goes so slow.
Not only that but the conventional time dictated by our watch doesn't even follow good or bad time.
Please Roberto explain to me how science reconcile all this?  

While this is an interesting question of psychology, why would you even think that it represents a problem for science in need of reconciliation? It doesn't. The brain is an imperfect "physical time" keeping device. That's neither controversial nor hard to explain.

[robvalue]

What the bloody hell are you even talking about Rik.

The brain perceives things imperfectly. That sentence alone debunks everything you've ever written, by the way.

When you're ready for real life, real science and actual peer review, let me know. Until then you're just another guy in his bedroom making up flowery pseudo-science with no purpose except massaging your own ego.

[Little Rik]

Roberto.  

Gee, I am so excited that an expert in science like you is here.
Look Rob, I always try to understand why the time differ so much among people and
in between good and bad time.
When People are happy the time goes very fast but when people suffer the time goes so slow.
Not only that but the conventional time dictated by our watch doesn't even follow good or bad time.
Please Roberto explain to me how science reconcile all this?  

While this is an interesting question of psychology, why would you even think that it represents a problem for science in need of reconciliation? It doesn't. The brain is an imperfect "physical time" keeping device. That's neither controversial nor hard to explain.

It seems that not just the brain but everything in this finite universe is in search for perfection in a
relentless move.
The time therefore represent this march from imperfect to perfect.
Said this it look like the time is nothing but a temporary effect that may well disappear once the
imperfect merge into the perfect which is not affected by time.
In other words the time is but an illusion that will vanish once the perfection is reached.
That is not an easy deduction to make for someone that believe in the reality of this universe.
Physical science is yet far far away from reconcile how the whole system works
for the simple reason that it never meant to lead to perfection as it is affected by positive and negative
that is why trying to rely on this science to understand what is outside her competency is like going around in circles and getting nowhere.