Posts: 33126
Threads: 1412
Joined: March 15, 2013
Reputation:
152
RE: Instead of asking
July 16, 2016 at 2:43 am
(This post was last modified: July 16, 2016 at 2:45 am by Silver.)
(July 16, 2016 at 2:40 am)robvalue Wrote: Does bending the rules of credulity and evidence to permit one huge set of beliefs make you more likely to do the same thing in other cases?
Interestingly enough, I find that those who bend the rules of credulity in relation to religion, especially when they are doctors or scientists, still abide by the secular rules of their stated profession.
I believe the exception takes place in extreme circumstances.
Crazy religious woman who drowns her kids because she heard god tell her to do so. She obviously had psychological problems.
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter
Posts: 29107
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
155
RE: Instead of asking
July 16, 2016 at 3:52 am
Fair enough, thanks. I admit I have very limited data to go on.
Posts: 46270
Threads: 540
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
109
RE: Instead of asking
July 16, 2016 at 4:20 am
Theists are gullible because people are gullible. I know atheists who play the lotto on the scientifically sound principle that 'Someone's gotta win', and people indifferent to religion who fall for the latest pseudo-scientific 'miracle cures' for everything from slight fatigue to jungle rot. Gullibility is a human problem, not an exclusively theistic one. If you haven't done so, I suggest reading 'Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds'. 175 years on, it's still an exemplary look at why people believe in the unrealistic.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax