European Islamic terrorist attacks

[GrandizerII]

Can I just point out:

- Not all people of arabic descent are immigrants
- Not all crimes committed by muslims are terrorist attacks
- Muslim people can suffer from mental illness as much as a non muslim

Just as not all skinheads are neo nazis.

Sent from my ALE-L21 using Tapatalk

It's fairly obvious that not all people of Arabic decent are immigrants, some of them live in Arabia for example.

My point is that you have someone saying we don't know who they are but we know who they aren't.

Then witnesses who were actually there saying yes they spoke in a foreign Arabic sounding way and looked North African/Arabic.

I'm not saying everyone there is an immigrant but why would someone deny they are immigrants while also saying they don't know who they are. While you can make an educated guess there is a fairly high probability of them being immigrants.

Maybe they know they're not immigrants, but they don't know exactly what ethnicity.

[account_inactive]

I don't know why information about these people isn't just given in a straight forward way.

I saw an article before saying this man wasn't a terrorist and he was Norwegian.

Then later you find out he was Norwegian, of Somali origins.  My guess would be also a Muslim.

Same thing with the German sex attacks at the train station.

The first thing that was said is " we don't know who these people are but they aren't immigrants".

Yet the people who were actually there were saying the people were blatantly Arabic.

It is in the interest of the media to report it how it is for the sake of politics. However, the flip side of that is, if it had been an attack on a Somalian, not only the normal public would have spouted "racist", but the media too would say he was a member of the BNP/NF/Britain First etc just because he has a skinhead. Then they find out that he suffers from alopecia, but because of the political stance of the media, they will stick to the original story and claim him to be a nazi. This is how dumb the media really are, I mean, there are skinheads out there who are against racism, however, bet your bottom dollar that any Skinhead against racial prejudice member, who walks into Compton will be beaten or even shot because of the way he looks, thus justifying that all races are prejudice, no matter what the media likes to tell us.

Edit:

I also remember a Slovakian friend of mine who went to the Eiffel Tower at night to see how beautiful Paris looks at night. Some guy from Senegal was hassling her and her friend for a date and she said no. She was called a racist, just because she said no. It is a bit like someone asking you if you want some whisky and you reply no. People are not going to accuse you of being teetotal, perhaps it is because you have had a few too many or you are going to meet friends to have an alcoholic beverage elsewhere.

She should have booted the bastard in the balls.

[GrandizerII]

It is in the interest of the media to report it how it is for the sake of politics. However, the flip side of that is, if it had been an attack on a Somalian, not only the normal public would have spouted "racist", but the media too would say he was a member of the BNP/NF/Britain First etc just because he has a skinhead. Then they find out that he suffers from alopecia, but because of the political stance of the media, they will stick to the original story and claim him to be a nazi. This is how dumb the media really are, I mean, there are skinheads out there who are against racism, however, bet your bottom dollar that any Skinhead against racial prejudice member, who walks into Compton will be beaten or even shot because of the way he looks, thus justifying that all races are prejudice, no matter what the media likes to tell us.

Edit:

I also remember a Slovakian friend of mine who went to the Eiffel Tower at night to see how beautiful Paris looks at night. Some guy from Senegal was hassling her and her friend for a date and she said no. She was called a racist, just because she said no. It is a bit like someone asking you if you want some whisky and you reply no. People are not going to accuse you of being teetotal, perhaps it is because you have had a few too many or you are going to meet friends to have an alcoholic beverage elsewhere.

She should have booted the bastard in the balls.

Yeah, let's believe everything people say.

[account_inactive]

She should have booted the bastard in the balls.

Yeah, let's believe everything people say.

It may or may not have happened. But if it did happen, she should have booted him in the fucking balls.

[abaris]

It may or may not have happened. But if it did happen, she should have booted him in the fucking balls.

Lot of Ifs, isn't it?

Maybe stick with what is fact and treat hearsay as such?

[account_inactive]

It may or may not have happened. But if it did happen, she should have booted him in the fucking balls.

Lot of Ifs, isn't it?

Maybe stick with what is fact and treat hearsay as such?

Okay. I'll be sure to point out more of your bullshit from now on.

[paulpablo]

It's fairly obvious that not all people of Arabic decent are immigrants, some of them live in Arabia for example.

My point is that you have someone saying we don't know who they are but we know who they aren't.

Then witnesses who were actually there saying yes they spoke in a foreign Arabic sounding way and looked North African/Arabic.

I'm not saying everyone there is an immigrant but why would someone deny they are immigrants while also saying they don't know who they are. While you can make an educated guess there is a fairly high probability of them being immigrants.

Maybe they know they're not immigrants, but they don't know exactly what ethnicity.

At the time no particular people were arrested or suspected, there were just descriptions of people who looked Arabic or North African and spoke in foreign accents.
How could you know someone isn't an immigrant purely based in descriptions which suggests they were immigrants.

[abaris]

Okay. I'll be sure to point out more of your bullshit from now on.

You do that. If I do the same it's probably a done game, going by all the one liners you're posting as of late. Aimed only at provoking (trolling) without having the tiniest shred of evidence for what you say or give kudos to. Otherwise you would already have responded to my question what BLM has in common with terrorism.

[account_inactive]

Okay. I'll be sure to point out more of your bullshit from now on.

You do that. If I do the same it's probably a done game, going by all the one liners you're posting as of late. Aimed only at provoking (trolling) without having the tiniest shred of evidence for what you say or give kudos to. Otherwise you would already have responded to my question what BLM has in common with terrorism.

Because certain factions within BLM are encouraging violence towards whites, particularly police officers for political aims. Rioting doesn't exactly help their cause either, however it's a decentralised movement so only certain factions, so to speak, should be classified as such. BLM is definitely a movement that should be monitored as a whole though.

Also, if you think I'm trolling, there's a report button under my posts.

[RobertE]

Yeah, let's believe everything people say.

It may or may not have happened. But if it did happen, she should have booted him in the fucking balls.

Believe me, she is as nice as anything and has perfect manners. At the end of the day, when you are a single woman in Paris at night, it can be dangerous, especially around the Eiffel Tower. Anyway, all they have to do is look up the name Dieudonné M'bala M'bala and there you will not only see a hypocrite, a racist, a friend of the Front National, he is a holocaust denier in the same league as David Irving. Yes guys, you better believe that blacks are just as racist as whites, and vice versa.