meaningless sex, or loving affection?

[Thumpalumpacus]

[ErGingerbreadMandude]

I could never have sex with someone I know absolutely nothing of. That would be like screwing a sex doll or something. You always need something, at the very least a 45 mins spent together, you need to get to know the person, get a feel of their boundaries, you know?

Second off, I'm not a huge fan of hugs and cuddles but I can manage. Although if my interaction with someone that I actually love (unlikely) consists entirely of hugs and cuddles, it sound would still be meaningless because sex is important for me.

[CapnAwesome]

So I have to think about it quite a bit. I mean it seems like the easy answer is 'go for love' but I'm also a pretty horny guy. You don't have a strong male libido. A lifetime of not getting laid is a pretty fucking horrid thought. A lifetime of no affection also sounds very lonely. It's sort of an awful choice. Good thing I don't have to choose as I like to cuddle after sex and I don't have sex with strangers or people I don't like. I sometimes have sex with my friends too, sometimes with a girlfriend, sometimes with someone who is a fleeting, yet special part of my life. I don't think I could have meaningless sex.

Edit: I picked the love and cuddling thing, just because I am an expert level masturbater.

[Tonus]

I chose genuine affection. I can always have meaningless sex with my hand.

[Edwardo Piet]

I'm very sexual and very affectionate. At a push I chose affection. But I'd simply get my sex elsewhere

[Athene]

The question's a no-brainer, in my view; I'd keep the genuine affection.
The gratification that "meaningless" sex provides can be readily duplicated with one hand. And a little imagination.

That lovin' feeling? Not so much.

[Edwardo Piet]

I crave affection so very much.