Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 5, 2024, 9:45 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
To explain why we can define God to affirm his existence!
#71
RE: To explain why we can define God to affirm his existence!
(March 23, 2017 at 12:02 am)Jesster Wrote:
(March 22, 2017 at 11:58 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: If God exists, do you think he would not give you at the very least this essential knowledge of who you are?

I've seen no evidence of anything like that.

Who you are as a person, is it objective or subjective? 

Whether you believe it's your physical brain creating or remain neutral and believe perhaps you have a soul, I am asking you, are you as in who you are, objective or subjective?
Reply
#72
RE: To explain why we can define God to affirm his existence!
(March 22, 2017 at 11:58 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: You don't actually have any evidence of physical form (which is not the measurement of reality), you in fact, only have evidence of your spiritual form which you directly see. 

Everything else you are interpreting to be physical but matter as in non-spiritual existence has no proof and has never been attempted to be proven by any human.

I do have evidence of a physical form. It's right here. I can touch it.

Now please provide evidence of a person's non-physical form without just claiming it exists.

(March 23, 2017 at 12:03 am)MysticKnight Wrote: Who you are as a person, is it objective or subjective? 

We've gone over this. Try to keep up.

(March 23, 2017 at 12:03 am)MysticKnight Wrote: Whether you believe it's your physical brain creating or remain neutral and believe perhaps you have a soul, I am asking you, are you as in who you are, objective or subjective?

I have evidence of my physical brain's existence. I've never seen evidence of a soul. Again, show the evidence. Claims won't convince me.
Reply
#73
RE: To explain why we can define God to affirm his existence!
(March 23, 2017 at 12:03 am)MysticKnight Wrote: Who you are as a person, is it objective or subjective? 

It's both.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply
#74
RE: To explain why we can define God to affirm his existence!
(March 23, 2017 at 12:03 am)Jesster Wrote:
(March 22, 2017 at 11:58 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: You don't actually have any evidence of physical form (which is not the measurement of reality), you in fact, only have evidence of your spiritual form which you directly see. 

Everything else you are interpreting to be physical but matter as in non-spiritual existence has no proof and has never been attempted to be proven by any human.

I do have evidence of a physical form. It's right here. I can touch it.

Now please provide evidence of a person's non-physical form without just claiming it exists.

(March 23, 2017 at 12:03 am)MysticKnight Wrote: Who you are as a person, is it objective or subjective? 

We've gone over this. Try to keep up.

(March 23, 2017 at 12:03 am)MysticKnight Wrote: Whether you believe it's your physical brain creating or remain neutral and believe perhaps you have a soul, I am asking you, are you as in who you are, objective or subjective?

I have evidence of my physical brain's existence. I've never seen evidence of a soul. Again, show the evidence. Claims won't convince me.

I am asking you even if you believe in no soul, the physical brain produces a you in that regard right? Is that you who you are objective or subjective?

(March 23, 2017 at 12:06 am)Stimbo Wrote:
(March 23, 2017 at 12:03 am)MysticKnight Wrote: Who you are as a person, is it objective or subjective? 

It's both.

Explain (I think I agree). But elaboration needed.

Objective to whom?
Subjective to whom?
Reply
#75
RE: To explain why we can define God to affirm his existence!
(March 23, 2017 at 12:07 am)MysticKnight Wrote: I am asking you even if you believe in no soul, the physical brain produces a you in that regard right? Is that you who you are objective or subjective?

I am not repeating myself anymore. Look back at my earlier post for the answer to your question.
Reply
#76
RE: To explain why we can define God to affirm his existence!
(March 23, 2017 at 12:08 am)Jesster Wrote:
(March 23, 2017 at 12:07 am)MysticKnight Wrote: I am asking you even if you believe in no soul, the physical brain produces a you in that regard right? Is that you who you are objective or subjective?

I am not repeating myself anymore. Look back at my earlier post for the answer to your question.
You haven't answered.
Reply
#77
RE: To explain why we can define God to affirm his existence!
Subjective to oneself. Objective to others. This much should be obvious, surely?
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply
#78
RE: To explain why we can define God to affirm his existence!
(March 23, 2017 at 12:09 am)MysticKnight Wrote:
(March 23, 2017 at 12:08 am)Jesster Wrote: I am not repeating myself anymore. Look back at my earlier post for the answer to your question.
You haven't answered.

Look harder
Reply
#79
RE: To explain why we can define God to affirm his existence!
(March 23, 2017 at 12:09 am)Stimbo Wrote: Subjective to oneself. Objective to others. This much should be obvious, surely?

Who you are as a person is objective to others?

(March 23, 2017 at 12:10 am)Jesster Wrote:
(March 23, 2017 at 12:09 am)MysticKnight Wrote: You haven't answered.

Look harder

You avoided it.
Reply
#80
RE: To explain why we can define God to affirm his existence!
(March 23, 2017 at 12:10 am)MysticKnight Wrote: You avoided it.

You missed it.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Proving the Existence of a First Cause Muhammad Rizvi 3 930 June 23, 2023 at 5:50 pm
Last Post: arewethereyet
  The existence of God smithd 314 27788 November 23, 2022 at 10:44 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Veridican Argument for the Existence of God The Veridican 14 2489 January 16, 2022 at 4:48 pm
Last Post: brewer
  A 'proof' of God's existence - free will mrj 54 8453 August 9, 2020 at 10:25 am
Last Post: Sal
  Best arguments for or against God's existence mcc1789 22 3560 May 22, 2019 at 9:16 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  The Argument Against God's Existence From God's Imperfect Choice Edwardo Piet 53 9897 June 4, 2018 at 2:06 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  The Objective Moral Values Argument AGAINST The Existence Of God Edwardo Piet 58 15608 May 2, 2018 at 2:06 pm
Last Post: Amarok
  Berkeley's argument for the existence of God FlatAssembler 130 17080 April 1, 2018 at 12:51 pm
Last Post: Pat Mustard
  Arguments for God's Existence from Contingency datc 386 51704 December 1, 2017 at 2:07 pm
Last Post: Whateverist
  A good argument for God's existence (long but worth it) Mystic 179 37298 October 26, 2017 at 1:51 pm
Last Post: Crossless2.0



Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)