Posts: 67292
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
162
RE: Objective morality as a proper basic belief
July 7, 2017 at 1:50 pm
(This post was last modified: July 7, 2017 at 1:55 pm by The Grand Nudger.)
(July 7, 2017 at 1:42 pm)SteveII Wrote: (June 30, 2017 at 8:45 am)Jörmungandr Wrote: "Is God's nature good because it is God's, or is God's nature good because it is morally good (i.e. it conforms to an independent standard of good)?" You see, playing the ontology card has gained you nothing. Just as the Euthyphro dilemma applies to Divine Command Theory, it also applies to the argument that morality is derived from God's nature. Either God's nature is arbitrarily good simply because it is God's, which results in an arbitrary set of morals which by definition is not moral. Or God's nature is good in that it conforms to a standard of goodness that is independent of God, making God's nature superfluous to the question of morals. You have accomplished nothing by your detour into ontology except to confuse the issue. God is still an unsatisfactory source of morality, and you're left empty handed, claiming the existence of objective morals that you can't explain.
See bold.
You have just gutted the dilemma. The unwanted conclusion of the original dilemma was that God could change his mind and good could be redefined. The bold above simply points out in so many words that morality is based on God's nature. Natures don't change. No unwanted conclusion.
Regarding the arbitrary characterization, how much more objective could the nature of an eternal God be? Objective enough to say anything objective about it, for starters..but I digress.
If god can't do this or that, being constrained by it's nature...that nature being good...then one wonders how another squares that away with calls to genocide. They must have been good, I guess? I mean, either that or the writers of magic book were bullshitting us. In any case, if god can;t do bad because gods nature is good it;s still "the good" to which we are referring. A standard wholly external to and immutable -by- a god...as you've just told us. God being some other thing, which he can't be, wouldn't make those things good - would it?
Suppose god really did do and say all the shit in magic book..which obviously he couldn't have, would they then, by virtue of being in gods nature, be good? This is what Jorg is referring to when noting the arbitrary pointlessness of grounding morality in "god's nature". I doubt that you think so, but it's important to understand.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Posts: 29843
Threads: 116
Joined: February 22, 2011
Reputation:
159
RE: Objective morality as a proper basic belief
July 7, 2017 at 2:06 pm
(July 7, 2017 at 1:42 pm)SteveII Wrote: (June 30, 2017 at 8:45 am)Jörmungandr Wrote: "Is God's nature good because it is God's, or is God's nature good because it is morally good (i.e. it conforms to an independent standard of good)?" You see, playing the ontology card has gained you nothing. Just as the Euthyphro dilemma applies to Divine Command Theory, it also applies to the argument that morality is derived from God's nature. Either God's nature is arbitrarily good simply because it is God's, which results in an arbitrary set of morals which by definition is not moral. Or God's nature is good in that it conforms to a standard of goodness that is independent of God, making God's nature superfluous to the question of morals. You have accomplished nothing by your detour into ontology except to confuse the issue. God is still an unsatisfactory source of morality, and you're left empty handed, claiming the existence of objective morals that you can't explain.
See bold.
You have just gutted the dilemma. The unwanted conclusion of the original dilemma was that God could change his mind and good could be redefined. The bold above simply points out in so many words that morality is based on God's nature. Natures don't change. No unwanted conclusion.
Regarding the arbitrary characterization, how much more objective could the nature of an eternal God be?
It being objective does not prevent it from being arbitrary. If it is based on the fact of God's nature being good, and that nature is considered good without respect toward anything beyond the mere fact of it being God's nature, then it could be anything and it would still be considered good. That robs it of any real moral significance.
I don't think you understand the dilemma, nor what it means for something to be arbitrary.
Posts: 3045
Threads: 14
Joined: July 7, 2014
Reputation:
14
RE: Objective morality as a proper basic belief
July 7, 2017 at 3:57 pm
(July 7, 2017 at 2:06 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote: (July 7, 2017 at 1:42 pm)SteveII Wrote: See bold.
You have just gutted the dilemma. The unwanted conclusion of the original dilemma was that God could change his mind and good could be redefined. The bold above simply points out in so many words that morality is based on God's nature. Natures don't change. No unwanted conclusion.
Regarding the arbitrary characterization, how much more objective could the nature of an eternal God be?
It being objective does not prevent it from being arbitrary. If it is based on the fact of God's nature being good, and that nature is considered good without respect toward anything beyond the mere fact of it being God's nature, then it could be anything and it would still be considered good. That robs it of any real moral significance.
I don't think you understand the dilemma, nor what it means for something to be arbitrary.
Are God's eternal unchanging moral properties arbitrary? Could they have been any other way? Perhaps, perhaps not--I don't think that is clear. I don't think it matters however, because you need God's nature to be arbitrary not in the sense that if could have been different, but that it still can be different.
The first horn "is something good because the gods will it" or
The second horn "do the gods will it because it is good?” but now
The third option (that has no unwanted conclusion): it is not God's will that defines the good but his unchanging nature that governs his will and his commands to us.
With a third option, there is no dilemma.
Regarding moral significance, that is relative judgment. I think the eternal moral properties of an unchanging God is a good place to anchor your morality. Certainly more objective than any other system.
Posts: 67292
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
162
RE: Objective morality as a proper basic belief
July 7, 2017 at 4:05 pm
(This post was last modified: July 7, 2017 at 4:09 pm by The Grand Nudger.)
(July 7, 2017 at 3:57 pm)SteveII Wrote: Are God's eternal unchanging moral properties arbitrary? If they're "moral" properties simply by being the nature of god..yeah...that;s the definition of arbitrary. Whatever those properties happened to be..they;d have been the "unchanging moral properties". Gut a child or not gut a child...whichever one god did would be "moral".
Quote:Could they have been any other way? Perhaps, perhaps not--I don't think that is clear. I don't think it matters however, because you need God's nature to be arbitrary not in the sense that if could have been different, but that it still can be different.
.............................
Quote:The first horn "is something good because the gods will it" or
The second horn "do the gods will it because it is good?” but now
The third option (that has no unwanted conclusion): it is not God's will that defines the good but his unchanging nature that governs his will and his commands to us.
With a third option, there is no dilemma.
Regarding moral significance, that is relative judgment. I think the eternal moral properties of an unchanging God is a good place to anchor your morality. Certainly more objective than any other system.
Well, I mean except for the parts about god being an ever changing thing if you guys are to be believeed...and not being able to objectively comment upon that god in any way, or being able to cogently answer a moral dilemma...sure.
Meanwhile.....what's wrong with harm? Since you're so big on suspicion of others moral foundations...I suspect that you are using harm..and not gods nature, as the foundation for your own morality. Could a god order the rape of a child and still be moral? If so, how so, if not, why not?
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Posts: 33251
Threads: 1416
Joined: March 15, 2013
Reputation:
152
RE: Objective morality as a proper basic belief
July 7, 2017 at 4:12 pm
Interestingly, god himself mentions in the bible that he is never changing.
I can understand why those who created this god character would choose to go that route. After all, it is more comforting to believe in a deity that remains true to itself no matter what, over the centuries of conflict that may arise throughout human evolution.
When theists begin to use apologists arguments to alter how followers view god, then that is merely in order to ensure they continue to believe during modern times of higher literacy and the knowledge available via the internet.
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter
Posts: 882
Threads: 6
Joined: November 14, 2014
Reputation:
26
RE: Objective morality as a proper basic belief
July 7, 2017 at 4:15 pm
All cool if one can evidence an unchanging god. God's morals seem to have changed even within the available testaments.
Posts: 11697
Threads: 117
Joined: November 5, 2016
Reputation:
43
RE: Objective morality as a proper basic belief
July 7, 2017 at 4:27 pm
And another theist who fails to solve to escape
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
Inuit Proverb
Posts: 42
Threads: 6
Joined: May 30, 2016
Reputation:
0
RE: Objective morality as a proper basic belief
July 7, 2017 at 10:34 pm
(This post was last modified: July 7, 2017 at 10:34 pm by Incognito.)
^^^
@Tizheruk
There's always Little Rik if you can bother to decipher the shit he's spewing out.
"I am against religion because it teaches you to be satisfied with not understanding the world" - Richard Dawkins
BIBLE - Blatant Intellectually Bankrupt Lies and Evil
Posts: 11697
Threads: 117
Joined: November 5, 2016
Reputation:
43
RE: Objective morality as a proper basic belief
July 7, 2017 at 10:37 pm
(This post was last modified: July 7, 2017 at 10:38 pm by Amarok.)
(July 7, 2017 at 10:34 pm)Incognito Wrote: ^^^
@Tizheruk
There's always Little Rik if you can bother to decipher the shit he's spewing out.
True True
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
Inuit Proverb
Posts: 2013
Threads: 28
Joined: January 1, 2017
Reputation:
15
RE: Objective morality as a proper basic belief
July 9, 2017 at 12:02 pm
(July 7, 2017 at 10:37 pm)Tizheruk Wrote: (July 7, 2017 at 10:34 pm)Incognito Wrote: ^^^
@Tizheruk
There's always Little Rik if you can bother to decipher the shit he's spewing out.
True True
Well to be fair, that insufferable little troll has already gone the route of dodging by merely arguing for a deistic creator god with no regard to its character beyond that. Once I cornered his unthinking ass there, he planted his flag and is rending his brain trying to figure out why he can't understand the infinite regress dilemma.
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
|