Is Accepting Christian Evidence Special Pleading?

[Huggy Bear]

You mean the one where I included Carl Sagan explaining how interaction with a being from another dimension would work? Which in turn vindicates the Audio recording?

But you don't care about facts, LFC you never do...
https://atheistforums.org/thread-41513-p...pid1213780

Accept it does not . And it's you that does not

[Amarok]

You mean the one where I included Carl Sagan explaining how interaction with a being from another dimension would work? Which in turn vindicates the Audio recording?

But you don't care about facts, LFC you never do...
https://atheistforums.org/thread-41513-p...pid1213780


Your bias is clear...

 
Yep.  And the difference between me and you is that I have, and will continue to admit my errors on the spot. That's not even the first thing I was wrong about in that thread.   I have been wrong, and admitted as such, many times over the course of two years here, debating atheists and theists alike.  I can admit to my prior biases.  I've been wrong about science, I've been wrong about history, and I've been wrong about logic.  I've committed logical fallacies, and accused others of committing them when they hadn't.  How else do you suppose one learns anything, Huggy?  Not you though.  You will go down with your self-respect, and take everyone along for the ride, rather than admit you fucked up.

 But you definitely were not wrong about the photo . Claims by Sagan or not.

[Huggy Bear]

 
Yep.  And the difference between me and you is that I have, and will continue to admit my errors on the spot. That's not even the first thing I was wrong about in that thread.   I have been wrong, and admitted as such, many times over the course of two years here, debating atheists and theists alike.  I can admit to my prior biases.  I've been wrong about science, I've been wrong about history, and I've been wrong about logic.  I've committed logical fallacies, and accused others of committing them when they hadn't.  How else do you suppose one learns anything, Huggy?  Not you though.  You will go down with your self-respect, and take everyone along for the ride, rather than admit you fucked up.

 But you definitely were not wrong about the photo . Claims by Sagan or not.

She's married dude.

[downbeatplumb]

Harry Nevis

Your opinion really doesn't matter, that IS how the word God is defined.


http://www.dictionary.com/browse/object

So the dictionary decides religious questions now?  You're a moron with thinking skills at all.

The dictionary defines words, that's kind of it's job...

---

Pretty much.

Do you just believe anything without evidence.....oh that's right , your a Christian.

Your pea-brian doesn't decide what is or isn't truth. Your 5 senses limit you to what they can physically detect. Just because your 5 sense can't detect something doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

If you were born blind would light not exist because you haven't seen evidence of it?

Did radio wave not exist in the times past, before they were detectable?

Did people believe in radio waves before there was evidence for the existence of radio waves?
I would say that they probably didn't.

What people did was adjust their beliefs on the basis of new information.

And I would be willing to adjust my view about the existence of or god or gods if there was sufficient evidence for it, why not, I don't actually care one way or the other.

But what I've seen so far are rather childlike ideas of gods that I find laughably stupid.

Not that laughably stupid things can't be reality, I mean you have Trump as president.

But I'm gonna need a whole lot of very convincing evidence in order to change my mind.

Until then.

There is no god.

Fair enough?

[Amarok]

Accept it does not . And it's you that does not

---

 But you definitely were not wrong about the photo . Claims by Sagan or not.

She's married dude.

Yes because the only reason a man can agree with a woman is if they want to have sex with them ......

That says more about you then I cared to know

[Huggy Bear]

You mean the one where I included Carl Sagan explaining how interaction with a being from another dimension would work? Which in turn vindicates the Audio recording?

But you don't care about facts, LFC you never do...
https://atheistforums.org/thread-41513-p...pid1213780


Your bias is clear...

 
Yep.  And the difference between me and you is that I have, and will continue to admit my errors on the spot. That's not even the first thing I was wrong about in that thread.   I have been wrong, and admitted as such, many times over the course of two years here, debating atheists and theists alike.  I can admit to my prior biases.  I've been wrong about science, I've been wrong about history, and I've been wrong about logic.  I've committed logical fallacies, and accused others of committing them when they hadn't.  How else do you suppose one learns anything, Huggy?  Not you though.  You will go down with your self-respect, and take everyone along for the ride, rather than admit you fucked up.

I said you make a fool of yourself.  I didn't say you're always wrong and I'm always right.

Also, kind of creepy that you right where to find that, considering it was from two years ago.  Do you keep a spread sheet?

 *emphasis mine*

Lent is predominantly a Catholic practice, it definitely is only practiced by denominational  Churches.

Patently untrue. I grew up in a Non-denominational church. That practiced lent.

Then I stand corrected.

See? I can admit when I'm wrong.

BTW, how is using the search function "creepy"?

[LadyForCamus]

Sure.  Hey!  Remember that time you tried to say that a picture of light was Jesus-magic?  😏

You mean the one where I included Carl Sagan explaining how interaction with a being from another dimension would work? Which in turn vindicates the Audio recording?

You mean the one where you invoked Carl Sagan in support of your little theory about the Holy Spirit, but then admitted that he would not accept your supernatural claim based on the available evidence?  Yeah, I remember. That's called, colloquially, talking out of both sides of your mouth.

[Harry Nevis]

Sure.  Hey!  Remember that time you tried to say that a picture of light was Jesus-magic?  😏

You mean the one where I included Carl Sagan explaining how interaction with a being from another dimension would work? Which in turn vindicates the Audio recording?

But you don't care about facts, LFC you never do...
https://atheistforums.org/thread-41513-p...pid1213780

Holy ad hominem, or tu quoque, or both, Huggy.  Why don't you try staying on track and addressing abaris's point to you?  

Your bias is clear...

Vindicates?  Don't use words you don't know the meaning of.

[LadyForCamus]

 
Yep.  And the difference between me and you is that I have, and will continue to admit my errors on the spot. That's not even the first thing I was wrong about in that thread.   I have been wrong, and admitted as such, many times over the course of two years here, debating atheists and theists alike.  I can admit to my prior biases.  I've been wrong about science, I've been wrong about history, and I've been wrong about logic.  I've committed logical fallacies, and accused others of committing them when they hadn't.  How else do you suppose one learns anything, Huggy?  Not you though.  You will go down with your self-respect, and take everyone along for the ride, rather than admit you fucked up.

I said you make a fool of yourself.  I didn't say you're always wrong and I'm always right.

Also, kind of creepy that you right where to find that, considering it was from two years ago.  Do you keep a spread sheet?

 *emphasis mine*

Lent is predominantly a Catholic practice, it definitely is only practiced by denominational  Churches.

See? I can admit when I'm wrong.

BTW, how is using the search function "creepy"?

Well, good for you then.  Nice to see you doing so.  

And, maybe I just enjoy a little snark now and then, is that so wrong? 😎

[Amarok]

See? I can admit when I'm wrong.

BTW, how is using the search function "creepy"?

That's not humbly admitting your wrong . That covering your ass when you have been called out. And pulling damage control .