Evolution

[DLJ]

...
Of course if these individual evolve more they may end up in a more evolved planet or dimension while individual who fail is most likely that they will end up as apes or animals or plants.

This of course is my understanding of how evolution works because it make sense.
...

On which planet or in which dimension does it make sense?

---

...
English is not my mother language that is why my English is not that good.

In other words your assumption is incorrect.  
If you also put me down on the bases that what I did write is wrong without coming with a counter claim that make sense then you fail twice.  

I wondered whether that might be the case. I went with probability.

Does this mean that you have attempted the research into evolution but the explanatory texts have not been translated into your native tongue?

[Little Rik]

All scientists did so far was to scratch the surface and that only involve the physical aspect.
Nothing about the non physical one.
Scientists so far never bother to see whether changes are due to a desire to evolve or just random changes.  

If how we evolve was indeed down to desire, why don't all men have a ten inch willy like mine?

Simple Cod.

Because other men are smarter than you.
They understand that the gland that control the sex is much much lower on the spinal cord than the one that control mind and spirit.
If the lower glands are able to give few seconds of pleasure the higher glands must obviously give much much more pleasure.

You chose to get one egg today rather that the whole chicken tomorrow.
If you think you are very smart Cod better think again.  

[Cod]

If how we evolve was indeed down to desire, why don't all men have a ten inch willy like mine?

Simple Cod.

Because other men are smarter than you.
They understand that the gland that control the sex is much much lower on the spinal cord than the one that control mind and spirit.
If the lower glands are able to give few seconds of pleasure the higher glands must obviously give much much more pleasure.

You chose to get one egg today rather that the whole chicken tomorrow.
If you think you are very smart Cod better think again.  

I don't like chicken.

[Little Rik]

...
Of course if these individual evolve more they may end up in a more evolved planet or dimension while individual who fail is most likely that they will end up as apes or animals or plants.

This of course is my understanding of how evolution works because it make sense.
...

On which planet or in which dimension does it make sense?

---

...
English is not my mother language that is why my English is not that good.

In other words your assumption is incorrect.  
If you also put me down on the bases that what I did write is wrong without coming with a counter claim that make sense then you fail twice.  

I wondered whether that might be the case.  I went with probability.

Does this mean that you have attempted the research into evolution but the explanatory texts have not been translated into your native tongue?

One more wrong assumption DLJ.
You have a dogma (false belief turned into a truth).
Your dogma is that you are convinced that knowledge must come from a text.

An old saying..........IF YOU WANT TO KNOW ALL YOU MUST FIRST KNOW YOURSELF.

It is by searching within that all knowledge come to the surface into your outer mind but I guess you never though about that, did you?  

[The Grand Nudger]

1) Evolution is directionless.

Correct, evolution is organic chemistry.  Chemistry doesn't have a direction.

2) Individual who are not able to survive are lost for ever.

Of course. You asked for an accurate description. The question itself is irrelevant outside of wish-thinking because even within that context; the dead don't fuck..so they're out of the evolutionary loop regardless.

3) Evolution has no goal.

OFC not, how would it?  An interested individual might. I like to breed flowers. I have goals, but evolution is just a process.

4) Evolution has no set speed.

Organisms have variable rates of reproduction.  The reason we use flies in experiments is because of their generation time.  It would be more difficult to experiment on crocodiles. Mendel used peas to work out the basics of the rules of heredity.

5) Plant stay plant animal stay animal human stay human.

Have you ever seen a human child climb up out of a head of cabbage?  Do you ever expect to?

6) Evolution is based on organic chemistry.

What did you think it was based on?

7) Evolution is driven by inherited genetic material, mutation, and relative rates of reproduction both between and within a species.

How did you think it was achieved?

8) You are an animal, no further evolution required.

Animalia is the biological kingdom to which we belong.  

All I did was to try to engage in a conversation that may better understand how evolution works.

-and hows that coming along?

[Little Rik]

Simple Cod.

Because other men are smarter than you.
They understand that the gland that control the sex is much much lower on the spinal cord than the one that control mind and spirit.
If the lower glands are able to give few seconds of pleasure the higher glands must obviously give much much more pleasure.

You chose to get one egg today rather that the whole chicken tomorrow.
If you think you are very smart Cod better think again.  

I don't like chicken.

You already said that mate.
By saying that you are satisfied with sex you automatically said that you are not interested in chicken.

I guess you never thought about that Cod, did you?  

[rskovride]

That is quite bizarre.

Atheists are very quick to say..........THE BURDEN Of PROOF IS WITH THE ONE WHO MAKE THE CLAIM.........blah, blah, blah...........
yet I have to read claims after claims from atheists that come without a drop of evidence as these below.

1) Evolution is directionless.
2) Individual who are not able to survive are lost for ever.
3) Evolution has no goal.
4) Evolution has no set speed.
5) Plant stay plant animal stay animal human stay human.
6) Evolution is based on organic chemistry.
7) Evolution is driven by inherited genetic material, mutation, and relative rates of reproduction both between and within a species.
8) You are an animal, no further evolution required.


These are atheists claims that turn into dogmas as no evidence back such a claims.  

I on the other hand did not claimed anything so I do not require to back up any claim or prove anything.  
All I did was to try to engage in a conversation that may better understand how evolution works.

One of you stupidly said that scientists already know everything about evolution so that's it.
End of the story.

What a BS guys.
All scientists did so far was to scratch the surface and that only involve the physical aspect.
Nothing about the non physical one.
Scientists so far never bother to see whether changes are due to a desire to evolve or just random changes.  

All you guys did was to make a fool of yourself by making unproven claims and believing that what has got to be found has already been found.  

All I did was to try to engage in a conversation that may better understand how evolution works.

 
This is not ALL you did.  The above quote leads me to believe your sole motivation was for everyone to better understand evolution. In that case, your questions might have been better suited for evolutionforums . org or biologyforums . org.  However, if you had motivation beyond better understanding of evolution you might post a thread in atheistforums . org .  Why don't you tell me your additional motivation? To do otherwise is dishonest.

[The Grand Nudger]

His main interest is a kneejerk inability to either comprehend or accept the reality death, lol. It shouldn;t get in the way of an understanding of evolution..because it doesn't have to...but this is LR, he has to make everything more difficult for himself.

[Cyberman]

Batshit knows no language barriers. Just sayin'.

[DLJ]

...
One more wrong assumption DLJ.
You have a dogma (false belief turned into a truth).
Your dogma is that you are convinced that knowledge must come from a text.

An old saying..........IF YOU WANT TO KNOW ALL YOU MUST FIRST KNOW YOURSELF.

It is by searching within that all knowledge come to the surface into your outer mind but I guess you never though about that, did you?  

Nothing wrong with assumptions when they are articulated and challenged. I will resist the temptations to point out your false assumption above because it does not further the conversation.

Where I live, children are taught that all knowledge comes from their god.

So there's that.

So, I am still left wondering whether the information that so many others (including me) have found and verified/validated is not available to you.

Are you claiming that knowledge only comes from an internal source?