Evolution

[Amarok]

That's ok, it would be rare for someone to know the answer about magnetism.

Lol and i'm almost certain your among them 

The point would have been that there is a cause to it, which isn't self organising or even self existent.

Assertion assertion assertions

[Gawdzilla Sama]

Which is another way of saying there is no reason to believe it's there .Because the universe looks the same without him .

That's correct.
The universe is separated enough to make God seem obsolete. And yes, you can choose what to think about it.
It's called freedom.

Take the Universe.
Take away  God.
Nothing changes.

[Amarok]

That's correct.
The universe is separated enough to make God seem obsolete. And yes, you can choose what to think about it.
It's called freedom.

We'll isn't that convenient 

And no i call it a good reason to believe in nonesene religion . But we have been over this already . And your failure does not need to be repeated here .

[Banned]

Self-organising processes find the path of least resistance by settling into the nearest stable state.

No intelligent direction or design required.

The playground for matter to exist and have paths of least resistence is highly sophisticated and beyond comprehension.

[Amarok]

That's correct.
The universe is separated enough to make God seem obsolete. And yes, you can choose what to think about it.
It's called freedom.

Take the Universe.
Take away  God.
Nothing changes.

Never has a better reason to doubt the existence of god come . Then from theists themselves .

[He lives]

Wouldn't that be intelligent design?

No. Unless you are suggesting that every snowflake in a snowstorm has been intelligently designed, in which case there's probably no helping you.

I wouldn't say that snowflakes are self designed. 

No such thing.

You sure about that?

---

---

[Banned]

Yes, I am very ignorant about evolution.

You don't have to be, you just chose to be.

So what has been "repeatedly testable" about evolution?

Nothing.

[Amarok]

The playground for matter to exist and have paths of least resistence is highly sophisticated and beyond comprehension.

Yup it's very complex this demonstrates nothing 

But no it's merely not yet understood not incomprehensible.

---

So what has been "repeatedly testable" about evolution?

Nothing.

Ignorance 

[Banned]

Nope it's a fact not a point of view it's a fact . I was not repeating myself but i appears to need to be repeated to the dense . And there's nothing that needs to be added that statement more then covers your drivel.

Then you are obviously wasting your time here, or do you have a need to call people names?

[Gawdzilla Sama]

You don't have to be, you just chose to be.

So what has been "repeatedly testable" about evolution?

Nothing.

We can predict what kind of critter we'll get when we cross-breed two other kinds of critters. Dog breeders and pigeon fanciers have been doing this for centuries but now we know why it works.