Yup. "Murrica Has No Shortage of Deplorable Motherfuckers

[Amarok]

Sigh they did not lie

Lying implies dubious intent it was a clarification of the issue and the photo as they have already pointed out .

You understand they said the girl was "Carried away screaming by US Border Patrol Agents" in the original article, right?
That was completely made up.  How does one mistakenly think the child was "carried away screaming by border patrol agents?"  The photographer saw what they had written, and corrected them.  
It was a piece of fiction that advanced the already phony narrative that goes with this photo.  That this girl is the 'face of Trumps immigration policy."  Even though everybody has said this incident has nothing to do with the change in policy.  But you get the picture going viral without the context, and a bunch of dopey people will draw the conclusions they want them to draw.
The 'clarification' is that the picture is bullshit.  The correction, is that they just made up part of the story.

---

Remember back when you found that snopes article, and you thought you got me good!?  Those were good times.

Now you're like "I don't think they intended to say "She was taken away screaming by border patrol agents." instead of the truth for any dubious reasons.  

Just so you know, "Yeah, Times fucked up on this one.  They need to be better."  is still on the table as an acceptable response.

I repeat they did not lie your the one inferring a nefarious intent  .And my original post had nothing to do with "getting you "  And at no point has my opinion shifted thus one more nefarious narrative on intent from you.

[henryp]

You understand they said the girl was "Carried away screaming by US Border Patrol Agents" in the original article, right?
That was completely made up.  How does one mistakenly think the child was "carried away screaming by border patrol agents?"  The photographer saw what they had written, and corrected them.  
It was a piece of fiction that advanced the already phony narrative that goes with this photo.  That this girl is the 'face of Trumps immigration policy."  Even though everybody has said this incident has nothing to do with the change in policy.  But you get the picture going viral without the context, and a bunch of dopey people will draw the conclusions they want them to draw.
The 'clarification' is that the picture is bullshit.  The correction, is that they just made up part of the story.

---

Remember back when you found that snopes article, and you thought you got me good!?  Those were good times.

Now you're like "I don't think they intended to say "She was taken away screaming by border patrol agents." instead of the truth for any dubious reasons.  

Just so you know, "Yeah, Times fucked up on this one.  They need to be better."  is still on the table as an acceptable response.

I repeat they did not lie your the one inferring a nefarious intent  .And my original post had nothing to do with "getting you "  And at no point has my opinion shifted thus one more nefarious narrative on intent from you.

You're doing great!  Remember when you said they didn't issue a correction, because there was nothing to correct.  But then I showed you the correction they issued!?  And you were like Nope! Even though Time itself called it a correction.  That was fun.

[Amarok]

I repeat they did not lie your the one inferring a nefarious intent  .And my original post had nothing to do with "getting you "  And at no point has my opinion shifted thus one more nefarious narrative on intent from you.

You're doing great!  Remember when you said they didn't issue a correction, because there was nothing to correct.  But then I showed you the correction they issued!?  And you were like Nope! Even though Time itself called it a correction.  That was fun.

I never said that .I said they did not need to because they did nothing wrong as in they didn't lie and no it's not a correction it's a clarification  .Then you showed what you showed and i rightly showed it was a clarification while you were weaving dubious narratives .And what Time calls it is irrelevant i say it's a clarification as they did not lie . I imagine you find you bad recollection of the events quite fun too bad i don't .

[henryp]

You're doing great!  Remember when you said they didn't issue a correction, because there was nothing to correct.  But then I showed you the correction they issued!?  And you were like Nope! Even though Time itself called it a correction.  That was fun.

I never said that .I said they did not need to because they did nothing wrong as in they didn't lie and no it's not a correction it's a clarification  .Then you showed what you showed and i rightly showed it was a clarification while you were weaving dubious narratives .And what Time calls it is irrelevant i say it's a clarification as they did not lie . I imagine you find you bad recollection of the events quite fun too bad i don't .

One of those tricky things where everybody in the world is calling it a correction except you, but you know better?  

"Um, just to clarify, when we said the kid was carried off screaming by a border patrol agent, that clearly meant the mother picked her up.  Hope that clarifies things." 

Can you imagine thinking that's what clarify means?  You're a silly goose.

[Amarok]

I never said that .I said they did not need to because they did nothing wrong as in they didn't lie and no it's not a correction it's a clarification  .Then you showed what you showed and i rightly showed it was a clarification while you were weaving dubious narratives .And what Time calls it is irrelevant i say it's a clarification as they did not lie . I imagine you find you bad recollection of the events quite fun too bad i don't .

One of those tricky things where everybody in the world is calling it a correction except you, but you know better?  

"Um, just to clarify, when we said the kid was carried off screaming by a border patrol agent, that clearly meant the mother picked her up.  Hope that clarifies things." 

Can you imagine thinking that's what clarify means?  You're a silly goose.

1. I don't care what "everyone else" calls it 

2. I already explained why it's a clarification . In face of your narrative at saying they lied . Which they did not .

3. Seriously you do love you narratives don't you ?

One wonders if my position is so wrong and unreasonable why you would continue to converse with me . After i'm crazy and stupid right

[henryp]

One of those tricky things where everybody in the world is calling it a correction except you, but you know better?  

"Um, just to clarify, when we said the kid was carried off screaming by a border patrol agent, that clearly meant the mother picked her up.  Hope that clarifies things." 

Can you imagine thinking that's what clarify means?  You're a silly goose.

1. I don't care what "everyone else" calls it 

2. I already explained why it's a clarification . In face of your narrative at saying they lied . Which they did not .

3. Seriously you do love you narratives don't you ?

One wonders if my position is so wrong and unreasonable why you would continue to converse with me . After i'm crazy and stupid right

I just think it's funny you can't not reply.  So I can basically force you to defend this really dumb position for as long as I like.  Who could pass up an opportunity like that?  

I do like that you dont worry what words mean to everyone else in the world.  That's potatoes.

[Amarok]

I just think it's funny you can't not reply. 

I already have over and over and over .

So I can basically force you to defend this really dumb position for as long as I like.  

I could make the same statement . Oh and i could end this anytime .So your not forcing anything i'm afraid . 

Who could pass up an opportunity like that?  

Clearly not you .Too bad you don't realize the opposite is happening 

I do like that you dont worry what words mean to everyone else in the world.  That's potatoes.

Only when their wrong or it does not work

[henryp]

I just think it's funny you can't not reply. 

I already have over and over and over .

So I can basically force you to defend this really dumb position for as long as I like.  

I could make the statement . Oh and i could end this anytime .So your not forcing anything i'm afraid . 

Who could pass up an opportunity like that?  

Clearly not you .Too bad you don't realize the opposite is happening 

I do like that you dont worry what words mean to everyone else in the world.  That's potatoes.

Only when their wrong or it does not work

No, it's very reasonable you should be the authority on whether Time magazine issued a correction rather than Time magazine.  That's the take of a reasonable person.  I look forward to your reply.

[Amarok]

I already have over and over and over .


I could make the statement . Oh and i could end this anytime .So your not forcing anything i'm afraid . 


Clearly not you .Too bad you don't realize the opposite is happening 


Only when their wrong or it does not work

No, it's very reasonable you should be the authority on whether Time magazine issued a correction rather than Time magazine.  That's the take of a reasonable person.  I look forward to your reply.

I'm allowed to disagree with them and i do .

[henryp]

No, it's very reasonable you should be the authority on whether Time magazine issued a correction rather than Time magazine.  That's the take of a reasonable person.  I look forward to your reply.

I'm allowed to disagree with them and i do .

You sound like trump.  He doesn't like, he just needs more clarification.