DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[CDF47]

No, I provided the definitions and you don't like them.  Not my problem.  The definitions are what they are, like any other word is defined.

No, you provided the definitions and I pointed out how they didn't fulfill the claims you had made, giving detailed reasons why they did not.  It had nothing to do with my liking or not liking them.  I'm not even sure I know what it would mean to not like a definition other than to say that a definition is wrong, and that I did not do.  So, in addition to proving once again that you can't back up your claims about specified complexity, you're showing that you're a terrible and transparent liar, a fact which I'd already indicated.

Put up or shut up.  This whining and lying is unbecoming, even for you.

I'm not whining about anything.  Just stating facts as they are.

[Everena]

Ok well I guess I misunderstood what you meant by that then. Yes, an animal that is in the final stage of evolution, when turning into an entirely different animal would occur. With 7.8 million different species of animals, you would think we could find at least one that was at the stage of evolution.

You can claim all the education and good grades you want, but this statement shows you know absolutely fuck-all about what evolution is or how it works. No clue at all!!

Everena: I understand what it is and how it works. I just don't accept it as fact. A couple pieces more of the puzzle would convince me. For instance that would OR new findings from genetics would (OR thousands more fossils)

---

I have read both sides of this.

Your understanding of the subject gives lie to this statement.

Everena: Why? Because I am not completely brainwashed by it like you apparently are? Healthy skepticism is a good thing.

[Anomalocaris]

You can claim all the education and good grades you want, but this statement shows you know absolutely fuck-all about what evolution is or how it works. No clue at all!!

Everena: I understand what it is and how it works. I just don't accept it as fact. A couple pieces more of the puzzle would convince me. For instance that would OR new findings from genetics would (OR thousands more fossils)

---

Your understanding of the subject gives lie to this statement.

Everena: Why? Because I am not completely brainwashed by it like you apparently are? Healthy skepticism is a good thing.

 

Says one who “knows” with absolute certainty.


Has it ever occur to you that your combination of towering conceit, abysmal ignorance, obliviousness to irony and propensity for mining quotes and articles you don’t understand makes you a quite a desirable central attraction for a morbid psychiatric cabinet or curiosities?

[Ravenshire]

You can claim all the education and good grades you want, but this statement shows you know absolutely fuck-all about what evolution is or how it works. No clue at all!!

Everena: I understand what it is and how it works. I just don't accept it as fact. A couple pieces more of the puzzle would convince me. For instance that would OR new findings from genetics would (OR thousands more fossils)

It's glaringly obvious you understand fuck-all about evolution every time you post about it.

Your understanding of the subject gives lie to this statement.

Everena: Why? Because I am not completely brainwashed by it like you apparently are? Healthy skepticism is a good thing.

No, because you demonstrate a fundamental lack of understanding of the subject with every single post.

Healthy skepticism is a good thing when it leads people to learn. What you have is not healthy skepticism where it concerns gawds or evolution. You accept made up bullshit woo in the absence of actual evidence yet deny science despite the tons of evidence. I don't know whether to pity you or just point a laugh.

[downbeatplumb]

Including the creator?

No, the Creator exists on a throne outside this universe.  He is also in this universe and knows all there is to know.

Prove it.

[CDF47]

No, the Creator exists on a throne outside this universe.  He is also in this universe and knows all there is to know.

Prove it.

Its based on faith but not blind faith.  After realizing the universe and living systems are designed, it is time to jump to theology for answers.

[downbeatplumb]

Prove it.

Its based on faith but not blind faith.  After realizing the universe and living systems are designed, it is time to jump to theology for answers.

But the universe and living systems weren't designed. 

And theology answers nothing by the way.

"God did it" is not an answer n itself, I would want a detailed description of "how" with evidence to support it. 
The same thing that we demand for every other claim.

[CDF47]

Its based on faith but not blind faith.  After realizing the universe and living systems are designed, it is time to jump to theology for answers.

But the universe and living systems weren't designed. 

And theology answers nothing by the way.

"God did it" is not an answer n itself, I would want a detailed description of "how" with evidence to support it. 
The same thing that we demand for every other claim.

Science explains many things well.

[downbeatplumb]

But the universe and living systems weren't designed. 

And theology answers nothing by the way.

"God did it" is not an answer n itself, I would want a detailed description of "how" with evidence to support it. 
The same thing that we demand for every other claim.

Science explains many things well.

Yes it does.

But of gods it has found no trace.

[Amarok]

it is time to jump to theology for answers

Theology has no answers it's as vapid as tea leaf reading