DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[Bucky Ball]

Nothing in Everena's crackpot "theory" has been *partially proven*. There is NOTHING AT ALL in any of the links to consciousness being "received".
Quantum reactions in micro tubules proves NOTHING.
There are micro tubules in all eukariotic cells, and micro tubules in brains are absolutely no different that the ones in her ass, therefor the physical brain location MUST be the primary mediator.

Any idiot with an IQ of 50 knows that a "receiver" implies a "sender", and NO ONE even hypothesizes what this "sender" is, or could be.
It's *not even* a "theory". Until a sender is identified and proven, it's nothing but hocus-pocus.
It's a piece of shit woo-woo.

BTW, putting up a list of Universities with NO REFERENCES to reasearchers, AND the credentials, and what they are working on EXACTLY is worth nothing. Zero. Zip
Try harder, Woo Princess.
Everyone can see you got nothing.

---

God being the creator of everything in the observable universe and having the highest intelligence to the point of being all-knowing, is capable of doing things that you with your limited human brain cannot possibly even fathom.

Isn't that special.
You're quite special ... you and your special knowledge.
You forgot one thing ... the evidence.
Post it (and NOT your "logic" *argument*) now or STFU.

---

To answer your last question first, the same way the rest of the sane world does. We just know.

[Everena]

Everena: You never took him seriously to begin with. He still has a partially proven theory with 20 testable predictions, 6 of which that are now confirmed and none that are refuted. It is proven and corroborated science no matter what someone like you pretends to think. Deepak is only in the picture because he has studied consciousness extensively too, but from a different perspective.
[/quote]

I took it seriously enough to look it up and think about it. I even gave you predictions of my own. Explain to me how magnets don't sheer your soul away.
How can you survive an MRI?

Why would you assume that would even happen anyway?

Why does consciousness always focus on the here and now if it's being received from elsewhere?

Because we are here to experience this life's challenges with no memory of life before this.

Why do we not observe intricate arrangements of microtubules in computational arrays?

Because we are human beings, conscious intelligent life, not computers.

Deepak Chopra hasn't studied consciousness from any perspective. He's a woomeister peddling deepities to suckers.

Deepak Chopra is a doctor and was the Chief of Staff at New England Memorial Hospital. He gave up his very successful career to study and teach eastern philosophies and he has spent years researching and studying consciousness, long before science even became interested.

[Anomalocaris]

Everena is special in one way, though, no one else, not even the most annoying and disingenuous theist, who ever inflicted themselves on this forum, has ever manage to go 600 posts without a rep.

Not one rep out of sympathy

Not one rep out out of pity

Not one rep out solidarity amongst the confused and the overreaching

Not one even out of sardonic irony!


Come on, some one rep her!

[Everena]

I've already stated it in my own words several times. The theory is that the brain is a receiver of our consciousness and is receiving quantum vibrations through the microtubules in our brain, much like a radio receives a signal or a cell phone or a computer with wifi receives a signal.

How do microtubules receive anything? You have no capacity to produce or maintain entangled particles.

Everena: Oh really? Prove it.

---

God can do anything. I am not saying that I can beat light speed, but God certainly can.

Can God create a contradiction?

God did not create any contradiction. Einstein was not God.

---

Everena is special in one way, though, no one else, not even the most annoying and disingenuous theist, who ever inflicted themselves on this forum, has ever manage to go 600 posts without a rep.

Not one rep out of sympathy

Not one rep out out of pity

Not one rep out solidarity amongst the confused and the overarching

Not one even out of sardonic irony!


Come on, some one rep her!

No thanks. I would rather have a bad reputation with the atheist community.

[Peebothuhlu]

God did not create any contradiction. Einstein was not God.

---

*Nods* Yup, righty-o. Moving along now.

Agreeing with your assertion that your Overmind can do anything it wants to. Litterally anything at all its whims desire.

Next respons, please.

Not at work.

[Everena]

[quote='Bucky Ball' pid='1857590' dateline='1543088615']
Nothing in Everena's crackpot "theory" has been *partially proven*. There is NOTHING AT ALL in any of the links to consciousness being "received".
Quantum reactions in micro tubules proves NOTHING.
There are micro tubules in all eukariotic cells, and micro tubules in brains are absolutely no different that the ones in her ass, therefor the physical brain location MUST be the primary mediator.

Any idiot with an IQ of 50 knows that a "receiver" implies a "sender", and NO ONE even hypothesizes what this "sender" is, or could be.
It's *not even* a "theory". Until a sender is identified and proven, it's nothing but hocus-pocus.
It's a piece of shit woo-woo.

BTW, putting up a list of Universities with NO REFERENCES to reasearchers, AND the credentials, and what they are working on EXACTLY is worth nothing. Zero. Zip

Everena: The researchers are listed in the links I sent you and in the portions of the articles that I posted. If you bothered to read anything instead of just running your mouth like an ignorant uneducated idiot, you would understand all of it by now. 


Try harder, Woo Princess.
Everyone can see you got nothing.

Everena: They only proved that is was possible. They did not prove that it was what was actually happening. I think you are misunderstanding. The important part about all of it was that they have proven that it is possible. And everyone with a brain got that already.


[quote]
God being the creator of everything in the observable universe and having the highest intelligence to the point of being all-knowing, is capable of doing things that you with your limited human brain cannot possibly even fathom.
[/quote]

Isn't that special.
You're quite special ... you and your special knowledge.
You forgot one thing ... the evidence.
Post it (and NOT your "logic" *argument*) now or STFU.

Everena: Oh why? Because my logic argument is a complete and utter fail for atheism?

[Bucky Ball]

No thanks. I would rather have a bad reputation with the atheist community.

Liar. How many hours have you spent here promoting your woo ? 
You clearly care a VERY GREAT deal about what is thought of you.
Your actions reveal your words are lies.

[Paleophyte]

I took it seriously enough to look it up and think about it. I even gave you predictions of my own. Explain to me how magnets don't sheer your soul away.
How can you survive an MRI?

Why would you assume that would even happen anyway?

Because magnetic fields affect electron spin. If Orch-OR was correct then an MRI should kill you.

Why does consciousness always focus on the here and now if it's being received from elsewhere?

Because we are here to experience this life's challenges with no memory of life before this.

That has no explanatory power. It just states what I said above. Why does consciousness behave that way?

Why do we not observe intricate arrangements of microtubules in computational arrays?

Because we are human beings, conscious intelligent life, not computers.

Then why do both the brain and DNA look like intricate information storage and processing arrays? Sorry, but you really are a computer, just a messy, organic, biological one.

Deepak Chopra hasn't studied consciousness from any perspective. He's a woomeister peddling deepities to suckers.

Deepak Chopra is a doctor and was the Chief of Staff at New England Memorial Hospital. He gave up his very successful career to study and teach eastern philosophies and he has spent years researching and studying consciousness, long before science even became interested.

Chopra is a faith healer and a quack who is not doing anything good for your credibility.

[Bucky Ball]

Oh why? Because my logic argument is a complete and utter fail for atheism?

LMAO ... you ? Logical ? You can't be serious. Miss Fallacy.
Not if they don't buy it. 
It's as much a pile of shit as your woo-woo *theory* (LOL) is. 
BTW, you forgot to tell us who the "SENDER" is, and where in the links the sender is discussed.
And you conveniently forgot to address the fact that all micro tubules in Eukaryots are the same.

[Everena]

No thanks. I would rather have a bad reputation with the atheist community.

Liar. How many hours have you spent here promoting your woo ? 
You clearly care a VERY GREAT deal about what is thought of you.
Your actions reveal your words are lies.

You wish that were true. I care only what God thinks of me and I do wish the best for all of you and hope you gain a better understanding of our purpose here, but I do not care what you think of me. Get over yourself.