Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 18, 2024, 3:08 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Why not deism?
RE: Why not deism?
(October 1, 2019 at 9:42 pm)Jackalope Wrote: To answer the OP's question, at the risk of sounding flippant...

A man that wears fear is as usefull in war as a pregnant woman. Big Grin
Reply
RE: Why not deism?
(October 4, 2019 at 9:23 am)Mister Agenda Wrote: The alternative to existence is absolute nothingness (no energy, no matter, no space, no time). Absolute nothingness seems to be an incoherent concepts (how long could that state of affairs last w/o time, for instance). There's absolute simplicity for you: existence exists because it has to.

Yes.

What is the alternative to existence, not existing? Absolute nonbeing?

If existence didn't always exist, how do theists even make the statement, 'god exists'?

You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.
Reply
RE: Why not deism?
Deism has no empirical evidence!
Reply
RE: Why not deism?
(October 7, 2019 at 5:23 pm)Ricardo Wrote: Deism has no empirical evidence!

If it did, it wouldn't be deism.

Tell the truth - you get lost on escalators, don't you?

Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Reply
RE: Why not deism?
Not sure how evidence that deism is true would stop it from being deism....
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.
Reply
RE: Why not deism?
(October 8, 2019 at 9:09 am)Mister Agenda Wrote: Not sure how evidence that deism is true would stop it from being deism....

Because a deistic creator is, by definition, one that would leave no evidence.  If you had evidence of a creator, it wouldn't be a deistic one.

Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Reply
RE: Why not deism?
Ah, I didn't read the part about deism where it requires that there be no evidence that it is the case, just that the creator of the universe not intervene in the universe it has created.
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.
Reply
RE: Why not deism?
(October 9, 2019 at 8:51 am)Mister Agenda Wrote: Ah, I didn't read the part about deism where it requires that there be no evidence that it is the case, just that the creator of the universe not intervene in the universe it has created.

In order for such a creator to leave evidence, it would have to intervene, don't you think?

Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Reply
RE: Why not deism?
Creation is not intervention?

If we accept that creation is like a mechanism capable of independent operation (ie it's more like a clock than a march box car), then there is no requirement for continuous intervention.   In such a case, it seems to me a deist god is just a god that let his creation that runs by itself for a longer stretch of time than other ideas of god.

A Diest is just a theist who doesn't think it is right to cry for mommy whenever the light is turned out, but is still comforted by the notion of a mommy.
Reply
RE: Why not deism?
(October 9, 2019 at 1:58 pm)Anomalocaris Wrote: Creation is not intervention?

If we accept that creation is like a mechanism capable of independent operation (ie it's more like a clock than a march box car), then there is no requirement for continuous intervention.   In such a case, it seems to me a deist god is just a god that let his creation that runs by itself for a longer stretch of time than other ideas of god.

A Diest is just a theist who doesn't think it is right to cry for mommy whenever the light is turned out, but is still comforted by the notion of a mommy.

The Abrahamic god routinely intervenes in the Cosmos (at least according to the manuals).  In theory, then, it should be at least possible to find some evidence that this meddling has taken place.  One would not expect to find such evidence if the Cosmos was created by a god who stopped at creation and then went its merry way.

And no, creation is not intervention.

Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Is Atheism a Religion? Why or why not? Nishant Xavier 91 7474 August 6, 2023 at 1:38 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Deism: I don't get it robvalue 114 17010 February 16, 2015 at 5:55 pm
Last Post: emilynghiem
  Whats the point of deism? tor 21 6831 March 19, 2014 at 11:05 pm
Last Post: MindForgedManacle
  Religion, Atheism, and Deism -and the middle ground. Mystic 6 3567 March 9, 2014 at 2:41 am
Last Post: rsb
  Why, Why,Why! Lemonvariable72 14 4041 October 2, 2013 at 1:21 pm
Last Post: Doubting Thomas
  Refute a first cause which most people would call G-d AKA Deism xdrgnh 63 22234 May 12, 2013 at 6:26 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  WHY WHY WHY??!?!? JUST STOP...... Xyster 18 5765 March 18, 2011 at 12:27 pm
Last Post: Zenith



Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)