Posts: 11342
Threads: 29
Joined: December 8, 2019
Reputation:
14
RE: Did guns or vaccines save more lives in 2021?
January 25, 2023 at 8:09 am
(This post was last modified: January 25, 2023 at 8:17 am by The Architect Of Fate.)
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Posts: 11342
Threads: 29
Joined: December 8, 2019
Reputation:
14
RE: Did guns or vaccines save more lives in 2021?
January 25, 2023 at 8:10 am
Quote:Why would it be "falsely claimed"? It's based on an actual study. Unlike you who keep insisting without evidence that guns kill so many more people than they save that banning them is justified.
A crank study and he's right and you're wrong...
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Posts: 28424
Threads: 524
Joined: June 16, 2015
Reputation:
90
RE: Did guns or vaccines save more lives in 2021?
January 25, 2023 at 11:57 am
(January 25, 2023 at 7:09 am)FlatAssembler Wrote: (January 24, 2023 at 7:55 pm)brewer Wrote:
What does that mean?
It's a gun-vaccine. Both saving lives in the best way.
I hate it when I have to explain, ruins the joke.
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental.
Posts: 46417
Threads: 540
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
109
RE: Did guns or vaccines save more lives in 2021?
January 25, 2023 at 1:17 pm
(January 25, 2023 at 7:11 am)FlatAssembler Wrote: (January 24, 2023 at 4:43 pm)Anomalocaris Wrote: guns are only claimed falsely to save 300,000 because a large section of the people would want the idiot joy of owning a gun and don’t really care how many people a system that allow them to own it actually kills. they will claim guns save 10 trillion people a day if they think idiots like you would repeat the claim.
Why would it be "falsely claimed"? It's based on an actual study. Unlike you who keep insisting without evidence that guns kill so many more people than they save that banning them is justified.
A claim can be based on an actually study and still be wrong.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Posts: 67292
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
162
RE: Did guns or vaccines save more lives in 2021?
January 25, 2023 at 1:29 pm
As, for example, any claims based on his study of croatian toponyms would be, according to the linguist he consulted.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Posts: 2020
Threads: 133
Joined: July 26, 2017
Reputation:
5
RE: Did guns or vaccines save more lives in 2021?
January 26, 2023 at 11:23 am
(January 25, 2023 at 1:17 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: (January 25, 2023 at 7:11 am)FlatAssembler Wrote: Why would it be "falsely claimed"? It's based on an actual study. Unlike you who keep insisting without evidence that guns kill so many more people than they save that banning them is justified.
A claim can be based on an actually study and still be wrong.
Boru
Sure, but there are different levels of wrongness. Claims that aren't based on a study are way more wrong than claims that are based on a flawed study.
Posts: 2020
Threads: 133
Joined: July 26, 2017
Reputation:
5
RE: Did guns or vaccines save more lives in 2021?
January 26, 2023 at 11:27 am
Posts: 46417
Threads: 540
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
109
RE: Did guns or vaccines save more lives in 2021?
January 26, 2023 at 11:29 am
(January 26, 2023 at 11:23 am)FlatAssembler Wrote: (January 25, 2023 at 1:17 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: A claim can be based on an actually study and still be wrong.
Boru
Sure, but there are different levels of wrongness. Claims that aren't based on a study are way more wrong than claims that are based on a flawed study.
Not necessarily. Suppose I make the claim, without a study, that trees are made of wood. Someone conducts a flawed study which concludes that trees are made of pickled beets.
Which claim is ‘way more wrong’?
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Posts: 2020
Threads: 133
Joined: July 26, 2017
Reputation:
5
RE: Did guns or vaccines save more lives in 2021?
January 26, 2023 at 11:30 am
(January 25, 2023 at 8:10 am)Helios Wrote: Quote:Why would it be "falsely claimed"? It's based on an actual study. Unlike you who keep insisting without evidence that guns kill so many more people than they save that banning them is justified.
A crank study and he's right and you're wrong...
Gary Kleck's study is, until you point to a better study, the best data we have. And I see no reason to think that almost everybody who thinks a gun saved their life is somehow mistaken, which seems to be the only way Gary Kleck's study could be wildly wrong.
Posts: 11342
Threads: 29
Joined: December 8, 2019
Reputation:
14
RE: Did guns or vaccines save more lives in 2021?
January 26, 2023 at 1:48 pm
Nope, bad science is not a substitute for no science and credulity isn't an argument.
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
|