Women's Rights

[Thumpalumpacus]

I see you like to practice love and acceptance for people that like to throw around the n-word, not to mention the questionable things you've said about black people, miss me with the bs. (I wish you would ask me for the receipts)

I'll take tu quoque for a True Huggy Experience™.

[Huggy Bear]

Since you're a fan of definitions, to which of the thousands of N-words would you be referring?

So you ARE dumb enough to ask ole huggy for reciepts...

https://atheistforums.org/thread-58859-p...pid1901987

After Angrboda was crying reverse racism for being disciplined for her repeated use of the n-word, you were there with open arms, and nudger had the nerve to bring up intersectionality.

[arewethereyet]

Since you're a fan of definitions, to which of the thousands of N-words would you be referring?

So you ARE dumb enough to ask ole huggy for reciepts...

https://atheistforums.org/thread-58859-p...pid1901987

That's it.  

This is a thread about women's rights that is mostly about trans women and women's bathrooms.

Let's get back to that.

I'll help since asking repeatedly didn't work.

[The Architect Of Fate]

You created a strawman and then criticize then argue against your own strawman,  who the dummy? What I actually said was that women that can't have children are still women for the simple fact that we acknowledge that is an exception, not the rule, trans women aren't in that same category.  YOU brought up menopause which speaks to BIOLOGY fool and isn't even an exception. How can something that biological women experience natural make them less of a woman? Trans women do not experience menopause (again, YOUR OWN ARGUMENT) making them NOT THE SAME.

I thought you turned over a new leaf Thumpalumpacus, but it seems you're still the clown you always were,  don't make me have to go post up some of your old arguments in the hall of shame.

 Exceptions are still relevant and defeater to your definition. Simply dismissing it as an exception isn't a counterargument. As for menopause, there is a woman who doesn't even experience that yet they are still women. So neither of those things makes women. Thus the absence in transwomen is not a disqualifier for womanhood and no Huggy you are the only clown in this thread and your to stupid to see it. 

The simple fact is it makes no sense to define women by biology and women aren't defined by biology thus transwomen are no less women than CIS ones and thus the dictionary definition is incomplete at best and wrong at worst.

[The Architect Of Fate]

Not sure what I said that's disparaging.. if I said an apple isn't the same as an orange am I disparaging the apple?

Denial of Trans Identities is nothing like comparing apples and oranges but nice try trying to make bigotry seem benign

[Angrboda]

Since you're a fan of definitions, to which of the thousands of N-words would you be referring?

So you ARE dumb enough to ask ole huggy for reciepts...

https://atheistforums.org/thread-58859-p...pid1901987

After Angrboda was crying reverse racism for being disciplined for her repeated use of the n-word, you were there with open arms, and nudger had the nerve to bring up intersectionality.

Your missives would be a lot more compelling if you had your facts straight. I was never disciplined for repeated use of the n-word. All you've shown is that you're a fact-challenged moron. Nobody gives a shit about your grievances, real or imaginary, aside from them showing you to be a petty douchebag who needs to move on.

[The Architect Of Fate]

So more typical of Huggy whining and using tu quoque fallacies to dodge his own failings. Sorry, drudging up old drama isn't a defense for your epic fail in this thread.

[arewethereyet]

Let's get back to the topic. The topic is not Huggy.

[The Architect Of Fate]

Oh, look. @Huggy Bear found another thread to disparage trans people in. Yay.

Of course he's trying to push the "Facts and Logic " angle for his bigotry. But no ones falling for it 

[LadyForCamus]

Oh, look. @Huggy Bear found another thread to disparage trans people in. Yay.

Not sure what I said that's disparaging.. if I said an apple isn't the same as an orange am I disparaging the apple?

Comparing gender to fruit is a false comparison. *yawn*

Get more original talking points.