Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 22, 2024, 12:09 am

Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Does reading a lot of Wikipedia give people a wrong idea how science works?
RE: Does reading a lot of Wikipedia give people a wrong idea how science works?
(October 23, 2023 at 2:24 pm)FlatAssembler Wrote: While mass shootings are tragic, they are very rare.

Bitch, please. Are you trying to show how fucking pig-ignorant you are?!?
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.
Reply
RE: Does reading a lot of Wikipedia give people a wrong idea how science works?
Quote:While mass shootings are tragic, they are very rare.
In 2023 alone there have been more then 500 mass shooting (defined as any shooter were more then 4 people were killed)

So very rare my ass.
"Change was inevitable"


Nemo sicut deus debet esse!

[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]



 “No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM


      
Reply
RE: Does reading a lot of Wikipedia give people a wrong idea how science works?
Quote:For the vast majority of gun deaths, other weapons would be about as effective as guns 
Bullshit  Dodgy

There is a reason mass killers choose guns and why no other weapon comes close to the effectiveness of a gun for mass killing
"Change was inevitable"


Nemo sicut deus debet esse!

[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]



 “No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM


      
Reply
RE: Does reading a lot of Wikipedia give people a wrong idea how science works?
Quote:Norway and Macedonia have more mass shootings per capita 
Pointing to two exception does not a rule make co,pared to all the countries that have strict gun laws and low mass shootings so your logic fails  Dodgy
"Change was inevitable"


Nemo sicut deus debet esse!

[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]



 “No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM


      
Reply
RE: Does reading a lot of Wikipedia give people a wrong idea how science works?
(October 23, 2023 at 2:24 pm)FlatAssembler Wrote: For the vast majority of gun deaths, other weapons would be about as effective as guns are.

This is quite simply not true. Shooting someone center-mass at fifty feet is far easier than stabbing someone at fifty feet, and more likely to be fatal, because unlike knives, bullet impacts impart shock-waves the in themselves can cause great injuries.. And you real cannot fend off a bullet, while you can certainly have a chance to fend off a knife-wielding assailant.

This is simply you talking out of your ass.

Reply
RE: Does reading a lot of Wikipedia give people a wrong idea how science works?
I guess you could say, all of the arguments assembled by this bozo, fall flat.
Reply
RE: Does reading a lot of Wikipedia give people a wrong idea how science works?
How many mass killings were there in the UK in2023??
The meek shall inherit the Earth, the rest of us will fly to the stars.

Never underestimate the power of very stupid people in large groups

Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling with a pig in mud ..... after a while you realise that the pig likes it!

Reply
RE: Does reading a lot of Wikipedia give people a wrong idea how science works?
(October 25, 2023 at 2:53 pm)zebo-the-fat Wrote: How many mass killings were there in the UK in2023??

We’ve had 9 in New Zealand. Oh, wait…you meant just this year? One.

We’ve had 9 in the last 72 years.

Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Reply
RE: Does reading a lot of Wikipedia give people a wrong idea how science works?
(October 23, 2023 at 2:24 pm)FlatAssembler Wrote:
(October 23, 2023 at 12:09 pm)The Architect Of Fate Wrote: To date the highest casualty mass stabbing was in Kunming in 2014 which  killed 31 and wounded 141 people and that still took 9 people in a crowded railroad station to pull off. While the deadliest mass shooting was the Las Vegas Strip Massacre in 2017 which  killed 58 and wounded 546 and that was carried out by one person.I think the contrast between guns and other weapons is stark.

While mass shootings are tragic, they are very rare. People died in mass shootings represent a tiny fraction (I believe around 2%) of all gun deaths. Even if we take for granted that gun control reduces mass shootings (which is in no way obvious, as Norway and Macedonia have more mass shootings per capita than the US in spite of having much stricter gun laws), it in no way follows that it will do something about the vast majority of gun deaths. For the vast majority of gun deaths, other weapons would be about as effective as guns are.

Three mass shootings in the US today, making 564 this year. How is that ‘very rare’?

Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Reply
RE: Does reading a lot of Wikipedia give people a wrong idea how science works?
(October 29, 2023 at 5:12 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:
(October 23, 2023 at 2:24 pm)FlatAssembler Wrote: While mass shootings are tragic, they are very rare. People died in mass shootings represent a tiny fraction (I believe around 2%) of all gun deaths. Even if we take for granted that gun control reduces mass shootings (which is in no way obvious, as Norway and Macedonia have more mass shootings per capita than the US in spite of having much stricter gun laws), it in no way follows that it will do something about the vast majority of gun deaths. For the vast majority of gun deaths, other weapons would be about as effective as guns are.

Three mass shootings in the US today, making 564 this year. How is that ‘very rare’?

Boru

I wonder, how many would constitute a problem that we should, you know, do something about?
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Google's Mobile-Friendly Test Driving Me Batty: What am I Doing Wrong? Rhondazvous 10 3126 August 14, 2015 at 12:05 pm
Last Post: Longhorn
  Reading redefined! Napoléon 31 3964 April 18, 2014 at 7:15 pm
Last Post: NoraBrimstone
  Please give me link voting english website A-g-n-o-s-t-i-c 4 1735 December 24, 2013 at 2:29 am
Last Post: A-g-n-o-s-t-i-c
  Idea for a service / business. Tiberius 3 1461 April 27, 2012 at 5:17 am
Last Post: frankiej
  Prof. Alan Woodward is Wrong; The Internet is Fine Tiberius 14 5808 March 15, 2012 at 4:49 pm
Last Post: Tiberius



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)