Posts: 14259
Threads: 48
Joined: March 1, 2009
Reputation:
80
RE: new testament, matthew chapter 2
February 4, 2013 at 7:49 pm
(This post was last modified: February 4, 2013 at 7:50 pm by fr0d0.)
(February 4, 2013 at 7:12 pm)catfish Wrote: I reject any and all things that I can identify as pagan in origin. Virgin birth, human sacrifice, triune god, etc. (February 4, 2013 at 7:38 pm)catfish Wrote: Dude, are you telling me that Jesus is my God? Proof that catfish is not an Christian as defined by the Christian Church
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_Church
According to catfish, this is the pagan origin church ™
catfish idetifies himself as a Christian. What kind of christian? The same kind of non Christian as Jehovas Witnesses, Mormons, Jews, etc..
Pick your flavour from here: http://www.religionfacts.com/jesus/religious_views.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_p...s_on_Jesus
These are faiths that venerate Jesus as a prophet, but do not hold to the articles of faith that were established in Nicea, which unites all Christians.
So why does catfish insist on blurring the boundaries? He clearly doesn't want to associate with mainstream Christianity. He considers it to be a heresy. He wants us to thinks that his is the right version, and that the mainstream is wrong.
That doesn't help much, because most people assume that he is coming from a known position, as he calls himself a Christian, and not something other, which would be the truth. From his religious views: "Personal and unique". People get confused at Christians disagreeing with him, when in fact he is pretending to be in their camp.
Yes this behaviour is juvenile.
Posts: 2911
Threads: 11
Joined: July 20, 2012
Reputation:
16
RE: new testament, matthew chapter 2
February 4, 2013 at 7:53 pm
(This post was last modified: February 4, 2013 at 7:56 pm by catfish.)
Show me where Yeshua said he was God, show me where Yeshua said that it was a requirement to believe he was God if he claimed to be God....
You can't, huh? Man does NOT define me, fuck your mainstream Paganism bullshit.
.
Posts: 14259
Threads: 48
Joined: March 1, 2009
Reputation:
80
RE: new testament, matthew chapter 2
February 4, 2013 at 7:55 pm
(This post was last modified: February 4, 2013 at 7:59 pm by fr0d0.)
(February 4, 2013 at 7:53 pm)catfish Wrote: Show me where Yeshua said he was God, show me where Yeshua said that it was a requirement to believe he was God if he claimed to be God....
You can't, huh? Man does NOT define me, fuck your mainstream Paganism bullshit.
. Proof
You're startnig to sound like you think you're God yourself. This is going to end badly 
Posts: 2911
Threads: 11
Joined: July 20, 2012
Reputation:
16
RE: new testament, matthew chapter 2
February 4, 2013 at 7:59 pm
(This post was last modified: February 4, 2013 at 8:00 pm by catfish.)
"It's a personal relationship with God" (that must adhere to mine or it's not a relationship with God...) < fuck that philosophy man, seek honour from God.
The world is deceived, I have no doubt.
(February 4, 2013 at 7:55 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: (February 4, 2013 at 7:53 pm)catfish Wrote: Show me where Yeshua said he was God, show me where Yeshua said that it was a requirement to believe he was God if he claimed to be God....
You can't, huh? Man does NOT define me, fuck your mainstream Paganism bullshit.
. Proof
I asked first, care to deny that and deflect?
Show me...
.
Posts: 14259
Threads: 48
Joined: March 1, 2009
Reputation:
80
RE: new testament, matthew chapter 2
February 4, 2013 at 8:01 pm
(This post was last modified: February 4, 2013 at 8:02 pm by fr0d0.)
I wasn't asking for it. I was highlighting it.
MOMMA I CAUGHT MYSELF A BIG ONE!!!!
Posts: 2911
Threads: 11
Joined: July 20, 2012
Reputation:
16
RE: new testament, matthew chapter 2
February 4, 2013 at 8:03 pm
lol, yeah, uh-huh, sure, like wow, didn't expect that...
Unfinished business dude...
.
Posts: 14259
Threads: 48
Joined: March 1, 2009
Reputation:
80
RE: new testament, matthew chapter 2
February 4, 2013 at 8:05 pm
Unfinished potty business more like. Lemme flush...
Posts: 2911
Threads: 11
Joined: July 20, 2012
Reputation:
16
RE: new testament, matthew chapter 2
February 4, 2013 at 8:09 pm
fr0d0, would you like to have a public debate in which I prove that you have lied and deflected? I'm going to leave "troll" out of it as that's mostly opinion based. However, if I prove that you lied and deflected, being a troll would naturaly be assumed by all witnesses.
Are you ready to face the truth of who and what you are?
.
Posts: 14259
Threads: 48
Joined: March 1, 2009
Reputation:
80
RE: new testament, matthew chapter 2
February 4, 2013 at 8:26 pm
Haha 
So I produce proof that you are not what you claim, what you have been doggedly asking me to do. There it is dude. In more detail and more thoroughly than before. You don't deny this. You are what you are, a bible thumping non Christian as defined precisely above.
So now you want a 'debate' where I am to agree to discuss you calling me a liar? Man that's too funny 
Proposition: "everyone lies to me mummy"
Let me see, what should my counter proposition be? "Why the hell should I be talking to this snot nosed kid."?
Looks like a non starter to me.
I know... how about some proof? Can you be bothered? like you couldn't be bothered to put everyone straight on your beliefs?
Posts: 2911
Threads: 11
Joined: July 20, 2012
Reputation:
16
RE: new testament, matthew chapter 2
February 4, 2013 at 8:33 pm
(February 4, 2013 at 8:26 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: Haha
So I produce proof that you are not what you claim, what you have been doggedly asking me to do. There it is dude. In more detail and more thoroughly than before. You don't deny this. You are what you are, a bible thumping non Christian as defined precisely above.
So now you want a 'debate' where I am to agree to discuss you calling me a liar? Man that's too funny
Proposition: "everyone lies to me mummy"
Let me see, what should my counter proposition be? "Why the hell should I be talking to this snot nosed kid."?
Looks like a non starter to me.
I know... how about some proof? Can you be bothered? like you couldn't be bothered to put everyone straight on your beliefs?
No, you produced a bare assertion without scriptural proof.
So, was the above your fullfillment of my prediction from the other thread? It sure looks like it...
"Patiently awaiting your denial, deflection, outright lie and major ad-hom*"
.
|
