Posts: 6300
Threads: 78
Joined: May 14, 2011
Reputation:
82
RE: Genesis Creation vs. Darwin's Macroevolution Myth
April 7, 2013 at 8:24 am
(April 7, 2013 at 7:30 am)Chuck Wrote: Look at this. If this isn't the second coming of Ego, then I don't what a miracle is!
Yeah, I really thought she was gone forever.. Well, you can't get everything you want 
When I was young, there was a god with infinite power protecting me. Is there anyone else who felt that way? And was sure about it? but the first time I fell in love, I was thrown down - or maybe I broke free - and I bade farewell to God and became human. Now I don't have God's protection, and I walk on the ground without wings, but I don't regret this hardship. I want to live as a person. -Arina Tanemura
Posts: 3117
Threads: 16
Joined: September 17, 2012
Reputation:
35
RE: Genesis Creation vs. Darwin's Macroevolution Myth
April 7, 2013 at 2:35 pm
(April 7, 2013 at 7:57 am)LastPoet Wrote: You know christians like to redefine words and meanings Chuck, perhaps Ego has a different meaning to the word "Forever"
Just like Jesus was coming "soon"...
Posts: 118
Threads: 10
Joined: April 13, 2012
Reputation:
0
RE: Genesis Creation vs. Darwin's Macroevolution Myth
April 8, 2013 at 2:20 am
ALTER2EGO -to- EVERYONE:
As can be seen, several non-believers have shown up with nothing resembling a rebuttal to my OP. They are spouting off about everything--except addressing the points in my OP. Obviously, they cannot deal with the reality that there is no evidence in the fossils record for macroevolution myth.
Posts: 33266
Threads: 1416
Joined: March 15, 2013
Reputation:
152
RE: Genesis Creation vs. Darwin's Macroevolution Myth
April 8, 2013 at 2:26 am
(This post was last modified: April 8, 2013 at 2:27 am by Silver.)
Sorry, Ego, but god did it is the least credible idea anyone ever imagined. Science strives to find the answers, whereas religion is content with remaining in the dark with the simpleminded god did it that explains everything illogically.
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter
Posts: 2911
Threads: 11
Joined: July 20, 2012
Reputation:
16
RE: Genesis Creation vs. Darwin's Macroevolution Myth
April 8, 2013 at 4:25 am
(This post was last modified: April 8, 2013 at 4:26 am by catfish.)
Crystals diddit!
Or aliens, high aliens...
.
Posts: 5389
Threads: 52
Joined: January 3, 2010
Reputation:
48
RE: Genesis Creation vs. Darwin's Macroevolution Myth
April 8, 2013 at 4:44 am
Why are you lot even giving this idiot the time of day?
![[Image: mybannerglitter06eee094.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i118.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fo112%2Fpussinboots_photos%2FBikes%2Fmybannerglitter06eee094.gif)
If you're not supposed to ride faster than your guardian angel can fly then mine had better get a bloody SR-71.
Posts: 7155
Threads: 12
Joined: March 14, 2013
Reputation:
72
RE: Genesis Creation vs. Darwin's Macroevolution Myth
April 8, 2013 at 5:29 am
(April 8, 2013 at 4:44 am)Zen Badger Wrote: Why are you lot even giving this idiot the time of day?
This is my first exposure to it. If I'd known that she was going to handwave any and all objections away...
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."
-Stephen Jay Gould
Posts: 4484
Threads: 185
Joined: October 12, 2012
Reputation:
44
RE: Genesis Creation vs. Darwin's Macroevolution Myth
April 8, 2013 at 6:16 am
(April 8, 2013 at 2:20 am)Alter2Ego Wrote: As can be seen, several non-believers have shown up with nothing resembling a rebuttal to my OP. They are spouting off about everything--except addressing the points in my OP. Obviously, they cannot deal with the reality that there is no evidence in the fossils record for macroevolution myth. I have addressed all of your points, fully and civilly, and you have not responded.
For Religion & Health see:[/b][/size] Williams & Sternthal. (2007). Spirituality, religion and health: Evidence and research directions. Med. J. Aust., 186(10), S47-S50. -LINK
The WIN/Gallup End of Year Survey 2013 found the US was perceived to be the greatest threat to world peace by a huge margin, with 24% of respondents fearful of the US followed by: 8% for Pakistan, and 6% for China. This was followed by 5% each for: Afghanistan, Iran, Israel, North Korea. -LINK
"That's disgusting. There were clean athletes out there that have had their whole careers ruined by people like Lance Armstrong who just bended thoughts to fit their circumstances. He didn't look up cheating because he wanted to stop, he wanted to justify what he was doing and to keep that continuing on." - Nicole Cooke
Posts: 682
Threads: 37
Joined: January 7, 2013
Reputation:
5
RE: Genesis Creation vs. Darwin's Macroevolution Myth
April 8, 2013 at 7:08 am
(April 8, 2013 at 2:20 am)Alter2Ego Wrote: ALTER2EGO -to- EVERYONE:
As can be seen, several non-believers have shown up with nothing resembling a rebuttal to my OP. They are spouting off about everything--except addressing the points in my OP. Obviously, they cannot deal with the reality that there is no evidence in the fossils record for macroevolution myth.
You posted lies about evolution. What is there to rebut? You know you posted lies. You know you are a liar.
What is the point of going further?
Posts: 11260
Threads: 61
Joined: January 5, 2013
Reputation:
123
RE: Genesis Creation vs. Darwin's Macroevolution Myth
April 8, 2013 at 8:51 am
Oh cool! A new one (whom I take from the comments here is actually an old one that predates me) This should be worth watching...
Well, I do happen to like talking evolution, so let's get into this a little bit: you disbelieve evolution, Ego? Macroevolution is kind of an eye rolling word because there's actually no distinction made there, but here, have a list of transitional fossils, that you claim don't exist, that prove species-to-species transitioning.
[url] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tra..._evolution[/url]
I simply cannot wait to watch this slide off of you like water off a duck's back!
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
|
