Definition of and evidence for the holocaust

[A_Nony_Mouse]

I thought reference to Dresden was conceding 57,000 civilians were murdered during WWII. If that was not clear. Yes WE AGREE that 57,000 civilians were murdered and that that is properly described as mass murder.

What is your problem?

LOL, still deflecting?

Do you accept the definition of "holocaust" as I gave it or not???
.

Yad Vashem would never agree with your definition of the Shoah. Why do not you take the best you can get from me regarding your definition? I am sure you can google Yad Vashem. They would laugh in your face for that definition. Consider me just humoring you.

[catfish]

LOL, still deflecting?

Do you accept the definition of "holocaust" as I gave it or not???
.

Yad Vashem would never agree with your definition of the Shoah. Why do not you take the best you can get from me regarding your definition? I am sure you can google Yad Vashem. They would laugh in your face for that definition. Consider me just humoring you.

Consider me humored by you.
You gave me nothing except an agreement for "mass murder". Predictable Bob will never agree to a definition of holocaust, will he?
.

[A_Nony_Mouse]

Yad Vashem would never agree with your definition of the Shoah. Why do not you take the best you can get from me regarding your definition? I am sure you can google Yad Vashem. They would laugh in your face for that definition. Consider me just humoring you.

Consider me humored by you.
You gave me nothing except an agreement for "mass murder". Predictable Bob will never agree to a definition of holocaust, will he?
.

Did you not know the people in Dresden were non-combatants and it was during the war? Both are true.

You said
"The attempted or realised mass murder of non-combatants during a time of war"

I have agreed with mass murder, non-combatants and during time of war. What do you imagine I have not agreed to? Attempted?

I agreed with you. Yad Vashem will still laugh in your face.

[catfish]

Your tactics are transparent as Hades man.

Holocaust = "The attempted or realised mass murder of non-combatants during a time of war"

You have your definition as you refuse to deny that definition I supplied. Whatever Yad Vashem thinks is irrelevant as the question I asked was directed at you.

This is your last chance to deny that definition before the nazi hunters find you... lol
.

[cratehorus]

...and who are these swell looking chums?

[A_Nony_Mouse]

Your tactics are transparent as Hades man.

Holocaust = "The attempted or realised mass murder of non-combatants during a time of war"

You have your definition as you refuse to deny that definition I supplied. Whatever Yad Vashem thinks is irrelevant as the question I asked was directed at you.

This is your last chance to deny that definition before the nazi hunters find you... lol
.

Nazi hunters. Like the Mossad and the IDF they come with their own PR team to look good.

I agreed at first and you did not like it. Now I agree with Yad Vashem and note WE disagree with you. Are you happier? Is it your fondest desire to have me use the word deny? Denial is a river in Egypt. I do not choose to use that word because it is semantically loaded for silly holohuggers. Pardon, that is redundant.

[Darkstar]

...and who are these swell looking chums?

Well, they look swell compared to these guys:

---

---

[catfish]

Nazi hunters. Like the Mossad and the IDF they come with their own PR team to look good.

I agreed at first and you did not like it. Now I agree with Yad Vashem and note WE disagree with you. Are you happier? Is it your fondest desire to have me use the word deny? Denial is a river in Egypt. I do not choose to use that word because it is semantically loaded for silly holohuggers. Pardon, that is redundant.

You're extremely predictable Bob. Must I point out the obvious mistakes you make? Do you really need me to provide links to your own posted words? If you had agreed with the definition, I wouldn't be pressing the issue, now would I? Show me where you ever agreed with my definition for holocaust.

So now I'll just ask you to supply a definition for "holocaust" since you wish to play the goal moving game.

---

Remember Bob, acceptable by US court standards. I want you to spell out your requirements and definitions...
.

[A_Nony_Mouse]

...and who are these swell looking chums?

Damned if I know. Might be from the Gulags or from Japanese prisoner camps from the Pacific if it traces to war time. No indications of religion unless they pull up the tunics. Care to produce traceable evidence as to who they are?

---

Your tactics are transparent as Hades man.

Holocaust = "The attempted or realised mass murder of non-combatants during a time of war"

You have your definition as you refuse to deny that definition I supplied. Whatever Yad Vashem thinks is irrelevant as the question I asked was directed at you.

This is your last chance to deny that definition before the nazi hunters find you... lol
.

I will hold you to your word that will now shut up.

---

...and who are these swell looking chums?

Well, they look swell compared to these guys:

---

---

I do not recognize the one on the left. The one on the right is attributed to Bergen-Belsen showing a mass burial of those who died of typhoid some ten days after liberation. I do not see a religion or cause of death in either of them.

During the Nuremberg trials an atrocity film was shown of Nazi officials burning hundreds of bodies. The accused broke out laughing. How could they!!! Turns out it was the cremation of those who died in the Dresden bombing. It was not usual to accuse the Germans of Allied atrocities.

Any rational person is skeptical of implications without evidence.

[catfish]

Your tactics are transparent as Hades man.

Holocaust = "The attempted or realised mass murder of non-combatants during a time of war"

You have your definition as you refuse to deny that definition I supplied. Whatever Yad Vashem thinks is irrelevant as the question I asked was directed at you.

This is your last chance to deny that definition before the nazi hunters find you... lol
.

I will hold you to your word that will now shut up.

What is it that you think is my "word" there? (btw, is English your native tongue?)
Are you saying that my word will now shut up? Sometimes you make sense in the most abstract weird way, but this isn't one of them...