Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 18, 2024, 2:34 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Genesis Creation vs. Darwin's Macroevolution Myth
#91
RE: Genesis Creation vs. Darwin's Macroevolution Myth
The Bible did not mention God poofing microbes into existence only because the people who invented the Genesis myth had no idea that microbes existed. They also thought the earth existed specifically before the sun, because they had no idea how that actually works, either. Which is why you really have to be dense to believe that the Bible explicitly had anything relevant to say about the origins of the universe. Genesis is just one of ten thousand cartoonishly stupid fictional accounts of what ignorant ancients that was responsible for the world around them and has not a single shred more credibility than any other.
Reply
#92
RE: Genesis Creation vs. Darwin's Macroevolution Myth
(May 22, 2013 at 10:07 am)ideologue08 Wrote: Well, the theory of evolution is scientifically valid, there's no question about that, it does make sense. But for Creationists such myself, that is of no concern to me because I believe in the concept of miracles, it is not inconsistent for a person who believes that Moses parted the red sea, or the burning bush or the Christ cures the leper, raises the dead etc. etc. to believe that God created humans directly. So the theory of evolution is the only valid conclusion provided that you reject all scriptural evidences and beliefs. So in the end, it all goes back to religious/non-religious beliefs, it's a theological issue for me first and foremost.

So, to put it a much simpler way: the facts don't matter to you, because magic!

Well, that's tantamount to throwing in the towel. That's admitting defeat: you don't have actual evidence, so you're resorting to unverified claims of fairy dust that you could never possibly hope to demonstrate. You're the equivalent of the kid playing imaginary games on the playground shouting that he has an "everything-proof shield" in whatever battle his friends are imagining.

To be honest, you're starting to sound like a parody of a theist.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee

Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Reply
#93
RE: Genesis Creation vs. Darwin's Macroevolution Myth
(May 22, 2013 at 10:07 am)ideologue08 Wrote: Well, the theory of evolution is scientifically valid, there's no question about that, it does make sense. But for Creationists such myself, that is of no concern to me because I believe in the concept of miracles, it is not inconsistent for a person who believes that Moses parted the red sea, or the burning bush or the Christ cures the leper, raises the dead etc. etc. to believe that God created humans directly. So the theory of evolution is the only valid conclusion provided that you reject all scriptural evidences and beliefs. So in the end, it all goes back to religious/non-religious beliefs, it's a theological issue for me first and foremost.

Then how do you explain so much resistance especially by Christians to Evolution? Is it a question of lack of education ( ignorance)?
Reply
#94
RE: Genesis Creation vs. Darwin's Macroevolution Myth
(May 22, 2013 at 8:54 pm)little_monkey Wrote: Then how do you explain so much resistance especially by Christians to Evolution? Is it a question of lack of education ( ignorance)?

It's precisely what he said in his initial post: evolution is a perfectly valid scientific theory, but to him and the people like him, the actual demonstrable facts don't matter as much as what he would prefer to be the truth, and since reality won't reshape itself around his petulant theological whims, he's taken to just ignoring it. Because magic works as an excuse for anything, and god is nothing but magic, the facts don't matter; what matters is just how much faith you can cram into the areas of ignorance these creatards won't allow themselves to fill with knowledge.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee

Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Reply
#95
RE: Genesis Creation vs. Darwin's Macroevolution Myth
You know, all this talk about a " magic sky-daddy" is closer to Wicca/ Paganism to the point that I am starting to understand that the abrahamic religions are just continuing the mythical "childish wishful thinking" humans have always had.

Much prefer the use of science to understand this world.
"The Universe is run by the complex interweaving of three elements: energy, matter, and enlightened self-interest." G'Kar-B5
Reply
#96
RE: Genesis Creation vs. Darwin's Macroevolution Myth


EARTH -to- ALTER2EGO:

I notice that in your picture you have blank spots where your eyes should be. Are you a zombie created by Voodoo? My mom told me never to fuck the undead.


[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]
Reply
#97
RE: Genesis Creation vs. Darwin's Macroevolution Myth
Well, none so blind and all that...
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply
#98
RE: Genesis Creation vs. Darwin's Macroevolution Myth
(May 22, 2013 at 7:31 pm)Esquilax Wrote:
(May 22, 2013 at 10:07 am)ideologue08 Wrote: Well, the theory of evolution is scientifically valid, there's no question about that, it does make sense. But for Creationists such myself, that is of no concern to me because I believe in the concept of miracles, it is not inconsistent for a person who believes that Moses parted the red sea, or the burning bush or the Christ cures the leper, raises the dead etc. etc. to believe that God created humans directly. So the theory of evolution is the only valid conclusion provided that you reject all scriptural evidences and beliefs. So in the end, it all goes back to religious/non-religious beliefs, it's a theological issue for me first and foremost.

So, to put it a much simpler way: the facts don't matter to you, because magic!

Well, that's tantamount to throwing in the towel. That's admitting defeat: you don't have actual evidence, so you're resorting to unverified claims of fairy dust that you could never possibly hope to demonstrate. You're the equivalent of the kid playing imaginary games on the playground shouting that he has an "everything-proof shield" in whatever battle his friends are imagining.

To be honest, you're starting to sound like a parody of a theist.
Pretty much yeah. Like I said, if I didn't believe in my religion then there's no question I would accept the theory of evolution, it has an astronomical amount of evidence. Nonetheless, for me, I am more convinced that my religion is true than the evidences that back up evolution ergo I'm a Creationist Smile I know I might sound strange, but that's because I'm a stranger (at least on this forum) and I believe in a strange religion...so glad tidings to the strangers!

(May 22, 2013 at 8:54 pm)little_monkey Wrote: Then how do you explain so much resistance especially by Christians to Evolution? Is it a question of lack of education ( ignorance)?
I'm not Christian so I don't know, I'm guessing evolution isn't compatible with the Bible? I don't know what you mean resistance, you can't really resist a particular teaching, Evolution is taught pretty much everywhere. And even if it wasn't, there are an awful lot of websites that discuss it.
Reply
#99
RE: Genesis Creation vs. Darwin's Macroevolution Myth
(May 23, 2013 at 9:43 am)ideologue08 Wrote: Like I said, if I didn't believe in my religion then there's no question I would accept the theory of evolution, it has an astronomical amount of evidence. Nonetheless, for me, I am more convinced that my religion is true than the evidences that back up evolution ergo I'm a Creationist Smile I know I might sound strange, but that's because I'm a stranger (at least on this forum) and I believe in a strange religion...

In essence the creation you believe in is compatible with believing that both the origin of life and its continuing evolution are both entirely natural and at the same time an expression of God's will. It's like attaching intention to that which transpires naturally. Would history have unfolded as it has, would biological forms have developed or the laws of physics be as we find them were it not God's will? That is a thoroughly untestable hypothesis. So you may safely avail yourself of science without fear of coming into conflicts with your religious beliefs. Well played sir!
Reply
RE: Genesis Creation vs. Darwin's Macroevolution Myth
(May 23, 2013 at 9:43 am)ideologue08 Wrote: Pretty much yeah. Like I said, if I didn't believe in my religion then there's no question I would accept the theory of evolution, it has an astronomical amount of evidence. Nonetheless, for me, I am more convinced that my religion is true than the evidences that back up evolution ergo I'm a Creationist Smile I know I might sound strange, but that's because I'm a stranger (at least on this forum) and I believe in a strange religion...so glad tidings to the strangers!

I might disagree with your view, but I can appreciate the honesty behind your expression of it; too often creationists try to cloak their beliefs in pseudoscience and half truths. I'm much more likely to at least respect the theist that'll forgo the illusory reasons and admit to their faith.

... But you're still wrong. Tongue
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee

Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Darwin's Voyage on the Beagle, droll dramatization Alex K 2 972 September 17, 2016 at 9:45 am
Last Post: Alex K
  Scientific Debate: Why I assert that Darwin's theory of evolution is false Rob216 206 46409 November 10, 2014 at 2:02 pm
Last Post: downbeatplumb
  Darwin Proven Wrong? sswhateverlove 165 28944 September 15, 2014 at 2:57 pm
Last Post: Mister Agenda
  My essay on evolution vs creation. Yahweh 11 4373 February 25, 2014 at 11:05 am
Last Post: bennyboy
  Have you ever actually gone to "Answers in Genesis.com?" Boris Karloff 13 3590 February 9, 2014 at 4:41 pm
Last Post: Rampant.A.I.
  Did Darwin get it wrong? Zone 20 5103 September 19, 2013 at 9:58 am
Last Post: Brian37
  Researchers debunk myth of 'right-brain' and 'left-brain' personality traits CleanShavenJesus 11 6244 August 18, 2013 at 7:12 am
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  Darwin Day KichigaiNeko 2 1625 February 8, 2013 at 8:25 am
Last Post: KichigaiNeko
  Evolution V Creation Zen Badger 168 69461 January 20, 2013 at 5:42 pm
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  Need some help refuting this creation argument... DaveSumm 25 10850 January 12, 2013 at 7:16 am
Last Post: Aractus



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)