Libertarian Fuckballs Expose Themselves

[Jackalope]

six thousand dollars here in this small town in Arizona wouldn't pay for a years rent in a small, wimpy trailer, gas (or buses), food or second hand clothing. With 6 grand you can get a six months rent in a house, not including food, gas, etc. Just the rent. Just six months. People need to eat. Don't forget the cost of living depending where you're at.

---

Where are you from?

If I recall correctly, he lives with his girlfriend, in her van. Apologies if my recollection is mistaken.

[Darth]

I don't get it, how can Charles Koch himself be a Kochsucker? Is that even anatomically possible? (perhaps it is for him, if so what a lucky bastard, rich and has a huge Koch, we should take his gold and force him to get a size reduction right?)

And what's your point? From what you've given us, your quotes, all we have is a (reasonable sounding) statistic: $34,000 puts you in the 1% (if we look at the world population), and then a countering statistic that basically points out that the first statistic might not be taking cost of living/purchasing power parity into consideration.

You've not told us anything about what Charles/his foundation said after, or what his broader point is. Just gone on about slavery like a numpty. Perhaps their point is that you should be wary of internationalist leftists who want to soak the 1%, you might not think they mean you, but they do. Perhaps they are just pointing out the hypocrisy or the lack of wisdom of some of the occupiers. Who knows, all I have is your nonsense about slavery. So I had to read the Huffington post article and watch the add to see what their point was (not that I'd trust your claims about what the add was about anyway). The add states that if you earn over 34k, you're in the 1% worldwide, you're relatively wealthy, which they claim is due to the economic freedom the U.S enjoys (when compared to other nations), though it's ranking/freedom is slipping. The article is about as information poor as your post, only adding that the advert aims to undermine protections for low and middle income americans and later that Charles is against the federal minimum wage law. Then right at the bottom of the article we see the hat tip to 'thinkprogress', which has all the 'information' (in more depth) that the HP article has, so no other research seems to have been done, the information has simply been taken from thinkprogress, then pruned. Below that is a slideshow of CEO's who look like villains. Apparently the Goldman Sachs CEO looks like Dr. Evil from Austin Powers.

Some conservatives might be obsessed with their money true, but leftists are obsessed with your money.

Put some more effort into your attacks please, this one seemed particularly lazy.

[Minimalist]

how can Charles Koch himself be a Kochsucker?

He's got a fucking libertard brother who is as big a kochsucker as he is.


And if you read the rest of the article you would see that this this rich cunt wants to abolish the minimum wage so big business criminal assholes can make even more money.

Get it now?

[Darth]

He's got a fucking libertard brother who is as big a kochsucker as he is.

I see what you did thar, hur hur hur.

[Isun]

He also wants to eliminate regulations.

Essentially he wants us to become another Bangladesh with people living in hovels and scraping by rooting through their garbage for food.

[Jackalope]

how can Charles Koch himself be a Kochsucker?

He's got a fucking libertard brother who is as big a kochsucker as he is.

I so want to insert SNL's 'cork soaking' sketch here.

"I soaka his cork, anna he soaka my cork - we soak each other's corks."

[DeistPaladin]

This is about greedy fucks that already have way more than enough money to live on but think they have the right to bleed everyone else dry just to get little bit more.

It's kind of a mental illness, that way. Here are people who have so much money, they and their children and their grand children will all want for nothing. They could do so much good for the world and yet they use all their power to crush everyone else around them to squeeze just a little more for themselves. Too much is never enough. There is no point I can see where they'll be happy with what they have. It's like hoarding or some similar compulsion.

[Isun]

It's called greed and like most CEO's I suspect a sociiopath. Simply has no conscience.

[A Theist]

It boggles my mind when you liberals are so obsessed with money.

Right, and conservatives are never obsessed with money.

Besides, this isn't really about money. This is about greedy fucks that already have way more than enough money to live on but think they have the right to bleed everyone else dry just to get little bit more.

Right, and conservatives are never obsessed with money.

No, it's more about liberals who are overly obsessed with people who have money.

[Isun]

Lols, more likely about people who care about all people. The reason I am a "liberal" is because I have a conscience. The reason I am not rich (though definitely in the top 10%) is because I have seen the kind of person one has to become to be rich and I have no wish to be like them. As I said, you pretty much have to be a sociopath as they take particular joy in destroying their competition. They aren't all sociopaths of course as some are compassionate and caring people. But unfortunately they are not in the norm.

Greed is unbecoming regardless of what it is for. Money, food, sex, or whatever it is that one has an obsession with beyond what they need.