The Problem of Imperfect Revelation: Your Thoughts?

[genkaus]

Because in Christianity God is logical.

Not really. This forum is littered with threads proving the illogicality of your god.

[fr0d0]

No. This forum is filled with attempts at proving that. And that matters not. What matters is that this is the proposed idea.

After all, you would have nothing to argue against if that wasn't proposed.

[genkaus]

No. This forum is filled with attempts at proving that.

Really? Because when I look through the forum all I see are sound proofs met with sloppy rationalizations and half-assed evasions.

[fr0d0]

Likewise. But that's a matter of perspective.

The point remains: this is our claim.

[genkaus]

Likewise. But that's a matter of perspective.

Not really.

The point remains: this is our claim.

I know. Just curious why you wouldn't trade it in for a more defensible one.

[LastPoet]

No. This forum is filled with attempts at proving that. And that matters not. What matters is that this is the proposed idea.

After all, you would have nothing to argue against if that wasn't proposed.

Consideration given and well undeserving towards your kind of deity fr0ds. We all have ideas and if you have many ideas then you are an idiot. Yet you stick to that particular fairy tale.

There would be nothing to argue against christianity if it wasn't proof enough to be the corrupt ideal it is. And bending over backwards doesn't strengthen your belief either, it rather confirms what is already known.

[fr0d0]

Showing your confirmation bias there genkaus.

In my view, my position is rational and your position is generally wildly irrational. This I reason to be so, and I can argue for it. I've been here a few years and I've yet to feel successfully challenged on my belief. I'm open to discussion and believe very strongly in questioning myself and my beliefs as thoroughly as possible. You say that you see clear refutations but I clearly see none.

[LastPoet]

Showing your confirmation bias there genkaus.

In my view, my position is rational and your position is generally wildly irrational. This I reason to be so, and I can argue for it. I've been here a few years and I've yet to feel successfully challenged on my belief. I'm open to discussion and believe very strongly in questioning myself and my beliefs as thoroughly as possible. You say that you see clear refutations but I clearly see none.

I have a bridge in brooklyn that I could sell it as cheap as you are selling that fish fr0ds

[fr0d0]

Consideration given and well undeserving towards your kind of deity fr0ds. We all have ideas and if you have many ideas then you are an idiot. Yet you stick to that particular fairy tale.

There would be nothing to argue against christianity if it wasn't proof enough to be the corrupt ideal it is. And bending over backwards doesn't strengthen your belief either, it rather confirms what is already known.

You badly misunderstand my deity poet. And we constantly correct you on that. What proof do you have of that? Answer: that the bible says the opposite to what is written. You're arguing with people who live and breathe the bible that they're wrong and you're right. Confronted with a myriad of logical justifications you stubbornly cling to your misinformation and parade it around like a fool with see through trousers.

Many times here I've seen atheists argue that black is white so afraid are they of losing a point. That doesn't make them right. Neither does it make a theist right that does the same thing. Does that confirm anything? Answer: that people are capable of bias.

I have a bridge in brooklyn that I could sell it as cheap as you are selling that fish fr0ds

I'll take it!

:p

[genkaus]

Showing your confirmation bias there genkaus.

In my view, my position is rational and your position is generally wildly irrational. This I reason to be so, and I can argue for it. I've been here a few years and I've yet to feel successfully challenged on my belief. I'm open to discussion and believe very strongly in questioning myself and my beliefs as thoroughly as possible. You say that you see clear refutations but I clearly see none.

That's because you have blinded yourself to rational arguments. All your mistaken beliefs here are easily explained by that.