Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 30, 2024, 12:23 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Mutations disprove the theory of upward evolution
#91
RE: Mutations disprove the theory of upward evolution
(October 4, 2013 at 2:23 pm)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: But you have no proof that fish became amphibians or that reptiles became Mammals. That is just you assumption.

Oh yes we do. For both claims.

So it turns out, the only assumption was yours.

How much research did you do before you decided there was no proof?

Quote:Please show that occurring now. We have fish. We have reptiles. But fish give birth to fish, and reptiles give birth to reptiles.

And showing your inability to understand evolution isn't increasing your credibility. Just, maybe your brain damage.

If you ignore my links and just keep trundling on, I'll consider it an admission that you've lost, too.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee

Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Reply
#92
RE: Mutations disprove the theory of upward evolution
I remember once telling my dad that I would find boxing more exciting if they put a blind and drunken retard in a robotic body up against somebody Floyd Mayweather or Manny Pacquiao, so you'd have a thrashing of a comically-inept opponent that was too stupid to ever fall. Thanks for providing the forum equivalent of this vision for everybody.
Reply
#93
RE: Mutations disprove the theory of upward evolution
(October 4, 2013 at 1:53 pm)Minimalist Wrote:
Quote:That show really was a good metaphor to remind society that compassion was better than greed.

A message lost on modern republicunts. Must have been because the characters were black.

If the modern republican party were like the Republican Teddy Roosevelt, I would have no problem with them. Teddy was anti monopoly and anti exploitation. Unfortunately he was ahead of his time and despite all the good he did, the great depression still happened.
Reply
#94
RE: Mutations disprove the theory of upward evolution
(October 4, 2013 at 2:36 pm)Brian37 Wrote:
(October 4, 2013 at 1:53 pm)Minimalist Wrote: A message lost on modern republicunts. Must have been because the characters were black.

If the modern republican party were like the Republican Teddy Roosevelt, I would have no problem with them. Teddy was anti monopoly and anti exploitation. Unfortunately he was ahead of his time and despite all the good he did, the great depression still happened.

Obama 'walking softly and carrying a big stick' would get results, too...and that would be getting shot by Capitol police for suspicion of burglary.
Reply
#95
RE: Mutations disprove the theory of upward evolution
(October 4, 2013 at 2:23 pm)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: We have fish. We have reptiles. But fish give birth to fish, and reptiles give birth to reptiles.

Evolution does not claim fish give birth to reptiles. Rather that fish slowly changed into amphibians one small step at a time over a long time period. Then amphibians did the same to eventually give us reptiles.

Here is the mud skipper. A modern species already well on the way to evolving into an amphibian. It is a living transitional form between fish and amphibians.

[Image: GambianMudskippers.jpg]
Save a life. Adopt a greyhound.
[Image: JUkLw58.gif]
Reply
#96
RE: Mutations disprove the theory of upward evolution
(October 4, 2013 at 3:30 pm)popeyespappy Wrote:
(October 4, 2013 at 2:23 pm)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: We have fish. We have reptiles. But fish give birth to fish, and reptiles give birth to reptiles.

Evolution does not claim fish give birth to reptiles. Rather that fish slowly changed into amphibians one small step at a time over a long time period. Then amphibians did the same to eventually give us reptiles.

Here is the mud skipper. A modern species already well on the way to evolving into an amphibian. It is a living transitional form between fish and amphibians.

[Image: GambianMudskippers.jpg]

If the picture is your evidence them you have no evidence.

It gives birth to mud skippers.
Reply
#97
RE: Mutations disprove the theory of upward evolution
Facepalm

You are aware that fish do not give birth, yes?

Oh wait, of course you aren't.
Reply
#98
RE: Mutations disprove the theory of upward evolution
(October 4, 2013 at 2:23 pm)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: But fish give birth to fish, and reptiles give birth to reptiles.

Not even. Both fish and reptiles lay eggs. Get your standard biology straight.

And how do you explain the presence of nylon-eating bacteria after 1930 if evolution is false?
Christian apologetics is the art of rolling a dog turd in sugar and selling it as a donut.
Reply
#99
RE: Mutations disprove the theory of upward evolution
(October 4, 2013 at 3:33 pm)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: If the picture is your evidence them you have no evidence.

It gives birth to mud skippers.

Great, now that you are suddenly concerned about evidence, please provide your evidence for Yahweh. We've been waiting.
Reply
RE: Mutations disprove the theory of upward evolution
"It gives birth to mud skippers."

Fail number X. (I've lost count completely now so X is a number between 5 and 10^50).

In case Grace doesn't know why its a fail - we are talking about evolution - not magic. Evolution doesn't happen generation to generation but over thousands of generations.

The mud-skipper is an example of an in-between species, between fish and amphibian. It is exactly what you requested.

Now I know that you want to see it change further and we can solve that issue too.

Evolution takes time - so if you leave the forum for a while and come back a bit later I am sure the mud-skipper will by then have further evolved into a whole new species of flying wombat.

Shall we arrange to meet back at this thread in 100 million years time. If I am wrong I will let you tell me so.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  a theory about modern xtian deconversion drfuzzy 14 3263 April 29, 2016 at 1:12 am
Last Post: Godscreated
  You Can't Disprove a Miracle Rhondazvous 155 20326 March 18, 2016 at 11:05 am
Last Post: Cyberman
  Hi, I'm a Christian. Help Me Disprove My Religion! WishfulThinking 265 67481 October 11, 2015 at 9:20 am
Last Post: Cyberman
  Planet Bieber update: Justin debunks the big bang theory TubbyTubby 32 6946 October 1, 2015 at 5:52 pm
Last Post: Crossless2.0
  Debunking the "Dying and Rising Gods" Theory Randy Carson 55 17426 September 22, 2015 at 3:24 pm
Last Post: abaris
  Christians to die out by diminished gene pool theory (sub-species) TubbyTubby 20 3835 August 20, 2015 at 5:18 pm
Last Post: brewer
  DEBUNKING THE CONSPIRACY THEORY Randy Carson 230 49699 August 19, 2015 at 3:14 am
Last Post: robvalue
  Let's say the multiverse theory is true, how would a Christian insert God...? Mr. Moncrieff 21 7765 March 1, 2014 at 7:15 am
Last Post: Alex K
  The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely SavedByGraceThruFaith 216 67121 October 14, 2013 at 6:05 am
Last Post: Zen Badger
  Do you believe in the mythist theory ? viocjit 14 5433 June 4, 2013 at 2:51 am
Last Post: FifthElement



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)