What are your educational qualifications to ask such questions?
Christian apologetics is the art of rolling a dog turd in sugar and selling it as a donut.
Mutations disprove the theory of upward evolution
|
What are your educational qualifications to ask such questions?
Christian apologetics is the art of rolling a dog turd in sugar and selling it as a donut.
RE: Mutations disprove the theory of upward evolution
October 4, 2013 at 4:35 pm
(This post was last modified: October 4, 2013 at 4:43 pm by Crossless2.0.)
(October 4, 2013 at 4:20 pm)Rationalman Wrote:(October 4, 2013 at 4:11 pm)Crossless1 Wrote: Whatever happens, please don't ban this one. My children -- each of whom understands evolution better than Grace -- are getting quite a kick out this embarrassment. Stupidity left to its own devices sometimes results in humility and a determination to actually learn. That's hard to do once you've drunk the Kool-Aid and think you have all the answers. Grace's particular brand of stupid is a direct result of his/her idolatry of the Bible. RE: Mutations disprove the theory of upward evolution
October 4, 2013 at 4:42 pm
(This post was last modified: October 4, 2013 at 4:46 pm by Zazzy.)
(October 4, 2013 at 4:23 pm)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote:Every question here demonstrates a fundamental misunderstanding of evolutionary theory and genetic mechanism. If I address those misunderstandings, are you going to listen, or are you going to ignore me and keep repeating them?(October 4, 2013 at 4:20 pm)Simon Moon Wrote: Reposted just for emphasis. Edit- Because unless you tell me you know how to listen, trying to educate you is going to be a waste of my time.
Ignore and repeat is his well established modus operandi. The chances of change are small.
Save a life. Adopt a greyhound.
(October 4, 2013 at 4:22 pm)Doubting Thomas Wrote: I posted that same picture a while back in this thread, so I wish you'd done the retarded fish frog. Oops! But can one ever have too much crockoduck in a thread such as this? OP, are you familiar with this model: 1. Unconsciously incompetent (don't know what you don't know) 2. Consciously incompetent (knowing of gaps in knowledge) 3. Consciously competent (You are aware of your skill/knowledge) 4. Unconsciously competent (Mastery, skill/knowledge is ingrained) Everyone and their respective knowledge falls somewhere on this model. Where do you suppose you fall viz knowledge of evolution?
This is a paradigmatic example of what religion does to a persons mind...
(October 4, 2013 at 4:25 pm)Esquilax Wrote:(October 4, 2013 at 4:23 pm)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: So you have observed abiogenesis in the lab? Miller-Yurey experiment produced a few amino acids. They are not living things. No one claims that. Also the experiment was controlled by an intelligent scientist. No abiogenesis there.
Christian apologetics is the art of rolling a dog turd in sugar and selling it as a donut.
RE: Mutations disprove the theory of upward evolution
October 4, 2013 at 5:04 pm
(This post was last modified: October 4, 2013 at 5:09 pm by Mister Agenda.)
(October 4, 2013 at 4:23 pm)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote:(October 4, 2013 at 4:20 pm)Simon Moon Wrote: Reposted just for emphasis. This is something that listening isn't. BTW, if one 'kind' had offspring of another 'kind' without human intervention like implanting an embryo of another species, it would disprove evolution in one fell swoop. You misunderstand evolution so badly that you think something that would disprove it would prove it. You're demanding a crocoduck, thinking it's clever to demand something atheist scientists can't deliver, but its existence would prove they are wrong.
Stupidity of this magnitude is criminal. Fuck me, believe whatever horse shit you want, Gracie, but telling experts in their respective fields they're wrong on the strength of a goat fucker's novel is insane!
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|