Why is there no mention of dinosaurs in the great book?

[bennyboy]

You do realize my comment was a snide jab at philosophy right?

Comments with regard to the value of philosophy are themselves philosophical. I therefore welcome your snide jab.

Bullshit about Bibles and science should go in the religion sections.

[Belac Enrobso]

You know since everyone/everything existed when Adam and Eve walked among the earth, dinosaurs would have probably eaten Adam, Eve, Cane and Abel. Not that Eve wouldn't have been ok with that, I mean she was the only female at the time of only Cain and Abel and Adam, so that being said, I'm pretty sure beastly with dinosaurs would have been a walk in the park compared to incest.

[Minimalist]

Must be a teeny Brontosaurus, huh?

Why the fuck do people even...no, never mind. Let these fucktards continue to believe there's such a dinosaur as the brontosaurus. They believe in sillier shit to begin with anyway.

They did used to call the apatosaurus "brontosaurus." This is the crowd that believes in talking snakes, world covering floods and dead jews coming back to life. You've got to let some of the small stuff slide.

[Jackalope]

Why the fuck do people even...no, never mind. Let these fucktards continue to believe there's such a dinosaur as the brontosaurus. They believe in sillier shit to begin with anyway.

They did used to call the apatosaurus "brontosaurus." This is the crowd that believes in talking snakes, world covering floods and dead jews coming back to life. You've got to let some of the small stuff slide.

It's just symptomatic of how far behind the curve some are in scientific matters.

[bennyboy]

Not. . .
fucking. . .
philosophy!