Banned at another atheist forum

[John V]

Er, I meant present the Biblical passages you're basing it on.

[Bucky Ball]

Er, I meant present the Biblical passages you're basing it on.

Er, well that would have the value of Harry Potter claiming what Dumbledore says is reality, wouldn't it.

Look up "circular" please.

[John V]

So if someone tells a blind man to see in the name of god, and he does, that's just a low probability natural event being attributed to god. Gotcha!

[Bucky Ball]

So if someone tells a blind man to see in the name of god, and he does, that's just a low probability natural event being attributed to god. Gotcha!

You go right ahead and actually prove that ever once happened in all of human history, then compare it with your control group, and we'll discuss the methodology, and the results. Meanwhile, thanks for agreeing, the moon really IS made of green cheese.

[John V]

You go right ahead and actually prove that ever once happened in all of human history, then compare it with your control group, and we'll discuss the methodology, and the results. Meanwhile, thanks for agreeing, the moon really IS made of green cheese.

You're dodging. The issue is the Biblical definition of miracles, not the actuality of miracles.

[Angrboda]

Just thought I'd insert in here that TTA's loss is our gain. Nice to see you around, John.

[Rampant.A.I.]

You go right ahead and actually prove that ever once happened in all of human history, then compare it with your control group, and we'll discuss the methodology, and the results. Meanwhile, thanks for agreeing, the moon really IS made of green cheese.

You're dodging. The issue is the Biblical definition of miracles, not the actuality of miracles.

[John V]

Ah, the typical TTA tag-team approach. I guess that's the TTTATTA! Roll your eyes if you like, but the fact is that the issue is definition, not existence. Here's the initial post. See for yourself.
http://atheistforums.org/thread-24729-po...#pid635203

[Bucky Ball]

Ah, the typical TTA tag-team approach. I guess that's the TTTATTA! Roll your eyes if you like, but the fact is that the issue is definition, not existence. Here's the initial post. See for yourself.
http://atheistforums.org/thread-24729-po...#pid635203

Wrong again Zed Male.
YOU asked the question concerning the blind man. All I did was ask you to demonstrate you r question made sense in the context of the discussion.
You failed.

You're also paranoid.
Just because two people in a row find your Findie theist crap to be the bullshit it is, does not mean a tag-team exists. It just means two people in a row find your bullshit to BE bullshit.
But with that sort of logic, I do see why you're so deluded.

[John V]

Wrong again Zed Male.
YOU asked the question concerning the blind man. All I did was ask you to demonstrate you r question made sense in the context of the discussion.

Incorrect. You asked me to "go right ahead and actually prove that ever once happened in all of human history," which is irrelevant in context of the Biblical definition of miracles.