Posts: 35277
Threads: 204
Joined: August 13, 2012
Reputation:
146
RE: Suggested Rule
April 29, 2014 at 10:51 pm
(April 29, 2014 at 10:33 pm)Stimbo Wrote: (April 29, 2014 at 3:10 pm)Beccs Wrote: There are several ways.
1. Become an good poster and earn the respect of the membership.
2. Wait until a position becomes available and apply for it, assuming you've achieved 1., above.
3. Blackmail
4. Bribery
The latter two are difficult as their price is high (I've tried) and it's hard to get incriminating/embarrasing pictures of the staff.
You left out assassination. That's how I got in.
I assumed you'd have to wipe out the entire staff to keep knowledge of your actions hidden?
Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni:
"You did WHAT? With WHO? WHERE???"
Posts: 30974
Threads: 204
Joined: July 19, 2011
Reputation:
141
RE: Suggested Rule
April 29, 2014 at 10:54 pm
(April 29, 2014 at 10:47 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: (April 29, 2014 at 8:17 pm)SteelCurtain Wrote: Why not combine the tasks? Argument #2 can be your debate topic with Esq.
Or are you not actually interested in doing anything other than presenting a topic, evading everything substantial, and then declaring yourself the winner?
I do not want to debate Esq. I would like to appeal to the masses. For people to turn to the Lord before it is too late.
Translation: I can't keep up the shuck and jive in a one on one debate.
Do you honestly think there is anyone here who isn't on to your bullshit (besides you, that is)?
Posts: 28389
Threads: 226
Joined: March 24, 2014
Reputation:
185
RE: Suggested Rule
April 29, 2014 at 10:54 pm
(April 29, 2014 at 10:47 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: (April 29, 2014 at 8:17 pm)SteelCurtain Wrote: Why not combine the tasks? Argument #2 can be your debate topic with Esq.
Or are you not actually interested in doing anything other than presenting a topic, evading everything substantial, and then declaring yourself the winner?
I do not want to debate Esq. I would like to appeal to the masses. For people to turn to the Lord before it is too late.
Lol. You're too funny.
(August 21, 2017 at 11:31 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: "I'm not a troll"
Religious Views: He gay
0/10
Hammy Wrote:and we also have a sheep on our bed underneath as well
Posts: 15351
Threads: 118
Joined: January 13, 2014
Reputation:
117
RE: Suggested Rule
April 29, 2014 at 10:58 pm
(April 29, 2014 at 10:47 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: I do not want to debate Esq. I would like to appeal to the masses. For people to turn to the Lord before it is too late.
But the masses have a unified voice saying you are unappealing. Do you not think your message would be more concise and palatable if there were one chain of responses rather than 50?
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
Posts: 25314
Threads: 239
Joined: August 26, 2010
Reputation:
156
RE: Suggested Rule
April 29, 2014 at 11:00 pm
(April 29, 2014 at 10:51 pm)Beccs Wrote: I assumed you'd have to wipe out the entire staff to keep knowledge of your actions hidden?
Oh they know. Well, they do now anyway.
This may not have been the brightest tactical move...
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
Posts: 5690
Threads: 8
Joined: April 3, 2014
Reputation:
68
RE: Suggested Rule
April 30, 2014 at 12:03 am
(April 29, 2014 at 10:47 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: I do not want to debate Esq. I would like to appeal to the masses. For people to turn to the Lord before it is too late.
How nice of you. In the same spirit of nicety I would like to appeal to you and all the religious masses to turn to logic before it is too late and you waste your precious lives completely.
Posts: 11260
Threads: 61
Joined: January 5, 2013
Reputation:
123
RE: Suggested Rule
April 30, 2014 at 12:27 am
(April 29, 2014 at 10:47 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: I do not want to debate Esq. I would like to appeal to the masses. For people to turn to the Lord before it is too late.
Consider something: right now, for a lot of people here you and your threads are little more than amusement. Those guys aren't taking you seriously, but if you and I debated? Suddenly, we're the main event, and I guarantee you that those people would show up to ostensibly watch you embarrass yourself against me.
But.
The advantage there, for you, is that you'd have the ability to clearly state your argument and message without having to deal with any mockery or distractions. You say you want to appeal to the masses? Well, here's a venue completely devoid of distractions and noise for you to get your message out. To be clear, everyone can see the debate threads just as anyone can see the regular threads; the only difference is that you're cutting out the hecklers that might impact the credibility of what you want to say, and having a debate would be noteworthy enough to drag in people that may never go into your threads otherwise.
If you're confident about the content of your arguments, then there's really nothing but advantages to you accepting my challenge.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Posts: 23918
Threads: 300
Joined: June 25, 2011
Reputation:
151
RE: Suggested Rule
April 30, 2014 at 12:54 am
(This post was last modified: April 30, 2014 at 1:08 am by Whateverist.)
(April 29, 2014 at 11:51 am)Kitanetos Wrote: Why does everyone want to become a mod?
Seriously. Those poor bastards have to go on dealing with nutty Matty long after the rest of us. Fortunately they do a damned good job. It could totally happen - having a xtian mod - but it would have to be someone with some perspective and tolerance. In general single-issue obsessed folks don't generally do a good job of oversight.
(April 29, 2014 at 7:54 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: My wife thinks I am spending too much time on this site.
She is probably right. No one here is just waiting for some very sincere person to come along so that we can quit hating on god and rejoin the fold. Really. Ain't happening.
I don't think you appreciate how condescending and pretentious it is to go on advocating for your personal beliefs when you know people don't share them. It isn't as if you have legitimate evidence people need to hear. All you have is your enthusiasm. No one cares. Don't think that wanting what is best for us is an out. Thinking you know better what is best for someone else is the epitome condescension.
But since you have the gall, let me just say that your god is a cock sucking, mother fucker. I encourage him to strike me down now to defend you .. yeah, right.
(April 29, 2014 at 7:54 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: My wife thinks I am spending too much time on this site.
She is probably right. No one here is just waiting for some very sincere person to come along so that we can quit hating on god and rejoin the fold. Really. Ain't happening.
I don't think you appreciate how condescending and pretentious it is to go on advocating for your personal beliefs when you know people don't share them. It isn't as if you have legitimate evidence people need to hear. All you have is your enthusiasm. No one cares. Don't think that wanting what is best for us is an out. Thinking you know better what is best for someone else is the epitome condescension.
But since you have the gall, let me just say that your god is a cock sucking, mother fucker. I encourage him to strike me down now to defend you .. yeah, right.
Posts: 658
Threads: 25
Joined: February 13, 2014
Reputation:
3
RE: Suggested Rule
April 30, 2014 at 10:46 am
(April 30, 2014 at 12:27 am)Esquilax Wrote: (April 29, 2014 at 10:47 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: I do not want to debate Esq. I would like to appeal to the masses. For people to turn to the Lord before it is too late.
Consider something: right now, for a lot of people here you and your threads are little more than amusement. Those guys aren't taking you seriously, but if you and I debated? Suddenly, we're the main event, and I guarantee you that those people would show up to ostensibly watch you embarrass yourself against me.
But.
The advantage there, for you, is that you'd have the ability to clearly state your argument and message without having to deal with any mockery or distractions. You say you want to appeal to the masses? Well, here's a venue completely devoid of distractions and noise for you to get your message out. To be clear, everyone can see the debate threads just as anyone can see the regular threads; the only difference is that you're cutting out the hecklers that might impact the credibility of what you want to say, and having a debate would be noteworthy enough to drag in people that may never go into your threads otherwise.
If you're confident about the content of your arguments, then there's really nothing but advantages to you accepting my challenge.
My goal is to present 7 arguments. After that I'll reconsider your offer.
Posts: 13051
Threads: 66
Joined: February 7, 2011
Reputation:
92
RE: Suggested Rule
April 30, 2014 at 10:48 am
Actions speak louder than words.
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell
|