The existence of ETs would mean...

[CristW]

Wait, hold on, are you using the Drake Equation to refute my post? Really?

Hey, chill there little dude. I just thought it of interest to the topic. Nothing more, nothing less.

Thanks for the Drake equation because it is an example of INDUCTIVE reasoning and not DEDUCTIVE reasoning.

[DramaQueen]

The existence of ETs would mean...

that the bible is a piece of shit.


Oh, wait. It's a piece of shit either way.

What about the koran?

[Minimalist]

Same shit.

[CristW]

The first step in quoting sources is to verify them.

From http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/technology/2...-new-data/

“The problem is very simple,” said David Sandwell, a Scripps geophysicist who worked on the project, in an email to ABC News. “When you measure seafloor depth you actually measure the two-way travel time of a sonar echo. The ship sends it, it bounces off the bottom, and returns to the ship. To convert the time to depth you need a velocity. If the velocity used in the conversion is a bit too high, the depth from that cruise will be greater than all the surrounding cruises. The particular cruise that created the ‘Atlantis’ problem was a systematic mow-the-lawn type survey in a regular grid pattern, so the resulting depth errors looked like a regular grid.”

Thanks for the info, please go ahead and refute the NAZI UFO vids. I would love to see the data on this.

Here is the problem:
1. The Atlantis vid was supporting evidence to the main evidence.
2. Even the recent photo concerning the "atlantis" grid seems controversial or rather not a 100% refutation(because you could still see some semblance of unnatural formation)!

[FatAndFaithless]

The first step in quoting sources is to verify them.

From http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/technology/2...-new-data/

“The problem is very simple,” said David Sandwell, a Scripps geophysicist who worked on the project, in an email to ABC News. “When you measure seafloor depth you actually measure the two-way travel time of a sonar echo. The ship sends it, it bounces off the bottom, and returns to the ship. To convert the time to depth you need a velocity. If the velocity used in the conversion is a bit too high, the depth from that cruise will be greater than all the surrounding cruises. The particular cruise that created the ‘Atlantis’ problem was a systematic mow-the-lawn type survey in a regular grid pattern, so the resulting depth errors looked like a regular grid.”

Thanks for the info, please go ahead and refute the NAZI UFO vids. I would love to see the data on this.

Here is the problem:
1. The Atlantis vid was supporting evidence to the main evidence.
2. Even the recent photo concerning the "atlantis" grid seems controversial or rather not a 100% refutation(because you could still see some semblance of unnatural formation)!

If you actually hold these views, you're my favorite poster of all time so far on AF. It's like talking to a star trek fan who thinks it's real.

[DramaQueen]

But star trek is real!

[CristW]

Thanks for the info, please go ahead and refute the NAZI UFO vids. I would love to see the data on this.

Here is the problem:
1. The Atlantis vid was supporting evidence to the main evidence.
2. Even the recent photo concerning the "atlantis" grid seems controversial or rather not a 100% refutation(because you could still see some semblance of unnatural formation)!

If you actually hold these views, you're my favorite poster of all time so far on AF. It's like talking to a star trek fan who thinks it's real.

No, I am not holding on to any views. I would love to see it refuted! I am disappointed by the lack of concrete and reliable refutation by "atheists". Again, we are the party of DOUBT. We should also DOUBT government information feed to us. We must question everything until it is filtered into a Truth-preserving form.

[FatAndFaithless]

If you actually hold these views, you're my favorite poster of all time so far on AF. It's like talking to a star trek fan who thinks it's real.

No, I am not holding on to any views. I would love to see it refuted! I am disappointed by the lack of concrete and reliable refutation by "atheists". Again, we are the party of DOUBT. We should also DOUBT government information feed to us. We must question everything until it is filtered into a Truth-preserving form.

So, were you born in a tinfoil hat? Or full-on burrito foil-wrap?

[CristW]

No, I am not holding on to any views. I would love to see it refuted! I am disappointed by the lack of concrete and reliable refutation by "atheists". Again, we are the party of DOUBT. We should also DOUBT government information feed to us. We must question everything until it is filtered into a Truth-preserving form.

So, were you born in a tinfoil hat? Or full-on burrito foil-wrap?

No, were you?

[FatAndFaithless]

So, were you born in a tinfoil hat? Or full-on burrito foil-wrap?

No, were you?

Yup. I'm actually a Nazi alien. I've been here for about 70 years and I'm just trying to make you look silly because you've figured out our plot.