RE: Un-United Kingdom
September 24, 2014 at 3:25 am
(This post was last modified: September 24, 2014 at 3:26 am by jesus_wept.)
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 29, 2024, 11:48 am
Thread Rating:
Un-United Kingdom
|
RE: Un-United Kingdom
September 24, 2014 at 5:01 am
(This post was last modified: September 24, 2014 at 5:07 am by Aractus.)
(September 22, 2014 at 1:44 am)Stimbo Wrote: Voting is indeed a civic duty and a small price to pay for the people who died to give us that right. However, if it were made compulsory, I think I would much rather spoil the ballot paper than be forced into voting.Pfft, no you wouldn't. Would you also deliberately create a hung jury if forced to serve on one? The USA's system is one of the weakest forms of "democracy". It is a system that generates a winning candidate primarily based on how much money they spend on their campaign. The campaigns are run to "get their supports to the polling booths", not to convert people to their argument or for that matter win the political argument. If you want the public to be represented you need everyone - or as many as possible - to vote. If 45% of people show up to vote that means that public opinion is not represented in the polls - all the polls represent is the number of people who showed up to vote to support their parties or candidates, and as mentioned that number is calculated directly on the money spent by the campaign to get their supporters to the ballot box. It doesn't tell you anything about the actual support for the candidate or the party, ergo it's not a true democracy. Example - if Party A gets 50% of their supporters to vote while Party B gets only 40% of their supporters to vote, which one wins? That question is impossible to answer without knowing how many supporters there are for each party in the first place, so for instance if Party A has 40,000 supporters but Party B has 45,000 supporters then Party A would win the election, regardless of the fact that they didn't have as many supporters. The single factor that is the main determinant of the voter turnout is whether voting is optional or compulsory. On the vote to registration ratio by country for 1945-2001 for parliamentary elections Australia ranked 1st out of 169 countries, the USA ranked 120th behind almost every other first world country there is (source: see pp. 4-5).
For Religion & Health see:[/b][/size] Williams & Sternthal. (2007). Spirituality, religion and health: Evidence and research directions. Med. J. Aust., 186(10), S47-S50. -LINK
The WIN/Gallup End of Year Survey 2013 found the US was perceived to be the greatest threat to world peace by a huge margin, with 24% of respondents fearful of the US followed by: 8% for Pakistan, and 6% for China. This was followed by 5% each for: Afghanistan, Iran, Israel, North Korea. -LINK "That's disgusting. There were clean athletes out there that have had their whole careers ruined by people like Lance Armstrong who just bended thoughts to fit their circumstances. He didn't look up cheating because he wanted to stop, he wanted to justify what he was doing and to keep that continuing on." - Nicole Cooke
Seems almost more like a debate over FPTP and PR.
Love atheistforums.org? Consider becoming a patreon and helping towards our server costs.
(September 23, 2014 at 11:41 pm)Drich Wrote:(September 23, 2014 at 6:36 am)Hoopington Wrote: [quote='Drich' pid='754948' dateline='1411157302'] OK, so...let me just clarify.... in Florida you did have several "third Party " recounts, I know....but, and this is the very important part in relation to your original point, they weren't done by anybodty outside the US were they? Just think about that for a second, now, what was your original point? "Opposed to being under British Rule" - Now, you're starting to sound like Mr Salmond (I'm sure, being the expert in all this, you know who that is), voting for independence in a referendum is quite different from opposing British Rule now isn't it? Come on now Drich, I'm sure you can spot the difference. I'll just point to all those protests after the vote count, that huge mob of people venting their frustration at being under colonial rule... Wait a minute..... there weren't any. Not one. Civil war is on it's way... Incidentally, my screen name is a private joke, "hoop" is another word for the arse hole...and I fail to see how it has any relevance. You ignorance on this subject is astounding.
@Aractus:
Pfft, yes I would. I've spoiled ballot papers in the past when I've disagreed with the choice of candidates and what they represent. It's a legitimate form of protest that doesn't require the surrendering of one's right to vote.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)