Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 1, 2024, 8:38 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Charles Barkley
#31
RE: Charles Barkley
Yeah... awesome strides, Heywood. I see that overcoming racism is a HUGE priority. Great job.

/sarcasm
Reply
#32
RE: Charles Barkley
(December 3, 2014 at 1:32 pm)rexbeccarox Wrote: Yeah... awesome strides, Heywood. I see that overcoming racism is a HUGE priority. Great job.

/sarcasm

You let me down rexbeccarox. I was looking forward to you making some critical comment on the actual argument I made instead of just commenting on me as a person.
Reply
#33
RE: Charles Barkley
How about "your argument is trash and your professed personal opinions on the subject are equally trash".

Better?
In every country and every age, the priest had been hostile to Liberty.
- Thomas Jefferson
Reply
#34
RE: Charles Barkley
(December 3, 2014 at 1:36 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote: How about "your argument is trash and your professed personal opinions on the subject are equally trash".

Better?

Negative....that is a derogatory comment....not a critical one.
Reply
#35
RE: Charles Barkley
You're damn straight it is.
In every country and every age, the priest had been hostile to Liberty.
- Thomas Jefferson
Reply
#36
RE: Charles Barkley
(December 3, 2014 at 1:36 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote: How about "your argument is trash and your professed personal opinions on the subject are equally trash".

Better?

Works for me.
Reply
#37
RE: Charles Barkley
(December 3, 2014 at 1:35 pm)Heywood Wrote:
(December 3, 2014 at 1:32 pm)rexbeccarox Wrote: Yeah... awesome strides, Heywood. I see that overcoming racism is a HUGE priority. Great job.

/sarcasm

You let me down rexbeccarox. I was looking forward to you making some critical comment on the actual argument I made instead of just commenting on me as a person.

I let you down? Oh... I'm crushed.
/sarcasm
Reply
#38
RE: Charles Barkley
(December 3, 2014 at 1:04 pm)Heywood Wrote: Most if not all people are racist....they are just too dumb to realize it.

It's interesting that you phrase it that way, because you don't even seem to be able to realize when you're being racist.

I've come to the conclusion that it's not a matter of intelligence when it comes to racism. I think it's more of a lack of self-awareness and an inability to put yourself in someone else's shoes.
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell
Reply
#39
RE: Charles Barkley
(December 3, 2014 at 1:44 pm)Faith No More Wrote:
(December 3, 2014 at 1:04 pm)Heywood Wrote: Most if not all people are racist....they are just too dumb to realize it.

It's interesting that you phrase it that way, because you don't even seem to be able to realize when you're being racist.

I've come to the conclusion that it's not a matter of intelligence when it comes to racism. I think it's more of a lack of self-awareness and an inability to put yourself in someone else's shoes.

I find it interesting that so many don't understand the basic elements of racism...but I guess that is the way the world is. Anyways I think I have argued my position in good faith. The conversation seems be turning toward derogatory remarks against people instead of critical analysis of arguments. Unless someone brings up a new and interesting point I don't see any reason to contribute to this thread any further.
Reply
#40
RE: Charles Barkley
The term "oreo", as I understand it, implies that a dark-skinned individual "acts like" someone lighter complexioned. Put another way, it's implying that a black person is "acting like a white person".

...as if the manner in which people act is dictated by thier skin color. As if there's a correct way for people of one skin color to act, and another way for those of a different color.

There aren't - there are, in fact, (sometimes damaging) stereotypes that such derogatory terms are a reflection of. Such derogatory terms are rooted in the very idea that there are ways for people of one color to act, and ways in which people of another color act, and never the twain shall they meet.

I find the term wholly racist and offensive in nature, and it ought to be offensive to all people, regardless of the color of thier skin. It's as offensive to me as "nigger", "cracker", or "gook".

It's a free country, Heywood. You're free to disagree, and you're likewise free to be wrong.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Charles Jenkins has died Sterben 0 518 December 13, 2017 at 10:26 pm
Last Post: Sterben
  Charles Manson dies c172 21 2519 February 1, 2017 at 6:42 pm
Last Post: abaris
  Charles Manson taken out of prison, rushed to hospital... c172 28 5525 January 4, 2017 at 4:16 pm
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  Charles Darwin the Origin of Species voted most influential academic book in history Heat 28 3612 November 16, 2015 at 3:25 am
Last Post: Alex K
  Prince Charles 'compared Russian actions to Nazis' sixchins 7 2185 May 25, 2014 at 8:17 pm
Last Post: kılıç_mehmet



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)