Creation/evolution3

[Anomalocaris]

I still say evolution is overrated if evolved creatures waste their time with drich.

[Drich]

Also, "artical".

---

And "Neoplean", lmao.

He's dyslexic.

Although you'd think he would at least use spell-check.

You're saying it like it were something to impeed my ablity to think and or reason.
You guys are ignorant if you think dsylexica is anything more than obversion to the rules of literary communication, and a way for bullies to oppress kids who think differently.

Churchhill, Patton, Henry Ford, Tesla, Eddison, Charles Schawb, Enistein, along with many many other who have literally brought light and modern life to the 'literate'.

We think differently, and often times can 'see/picture' things differently which allows for innovations and understanding that others are not privy to.

Without a doubt it is a very difficult road to travel, but once the major obsicals are over come 'we' tend to be very sucessful in whatever we set out to do.

---

He's dyslexic.

Although you'd think he would at least use spell-check.

Exactly. I've heard him complain of dyslexia, but both Firefox and Chrome underline misspelled words. I'm not normally one to point out this sort of thing, but "artical" I will point out every time he misspells it, because that error was pointed out to him and he simply refuses to acknowledge it ... as if the first admission of error will crack the dam.

And let's face it, "Neopleon" is simply funny. I didn't know there was an Emperor Pleon, much less his son Neopleon who went to Egypt.

apple products 'learn' common mispellings and puts them into memory. my PC's run an older Internet explorer to comply with my billing software needs. So no spell check.

Also it give people with weaker arguements something legit to buzz in about when they are failing in every other way.

[Anomalocaris]

He's dyslexic.

Although you'd think he would at least use spell-check.

You're saying it like it were something to impeed my ablity to think and or reason.
You guys are ignorant if you think dsylexica is anything more than obversion to the rules of literary communication, and a way for bullies to oppress kids who think differently.

Churchhill, Patton, Henry Ford, Tesla, Eddison, Charles Schawb, Enistein, along with many many other who have literally brought light and modern life to the 'literate'.

We think differently, and often times can 'see/picture' things differently which allows for innovations and understanding that others are not privy to.

Without a doubt it is a very difficult road to travel, but once the major obsicals are over come 'we' tend to be very sucessful in whatever we set out to do.

We? So you think your "ablity" is in the same class as "churchhill", "Eddison", and "Enistein" now?

Whatever people say about "churchhill", "Eddison", and "Enistein"
no one ever accused "churchhill", "Eddison", and "Enistein" of "obversion" to rules of literary communication, drich.

I don't know, I also think it's not just your "obversion" to rules of literary communication that will stand as "obsicals" to "impeed" your dream of being "very sucessful" in the same way as "churchhill", "Eddison", and "Enistein", drich.

But a howling baboon can't, nor need to, feel any affinity for rules of literary communication, drich. But as a howling baboon, you are already quite "sucessful", drich.

[Drich]

Exactly. I've heard him complain of dyslexia, but both Firefox and Chrome underline misspelled words. I'm not normally one to point out this sort of thing, but "artical" I will point out every time he misspells it, because that error was pointed out to him and he simply refuses to acknowledge it ... as if the first admission of error will crack the dam.

And let's face it, "Neopleon" is simply funny. I didn't know there was an Emperor Pleon, much less his son Neopleon who went to Egypt.

Never attribute to dyslexia what can be attributed to a idiot's pride in idiocy. A dyslexic person can work around the problem. Drich senses any value he could imagine himself to possess rest entirely in the idiocy that prevents him from seeing his own worthlessness, so he abhors working around his idiocy because that would threaten to deflate his delusional perception of his own value.

Actually Drich see, his spelling as a trivial point, a needless formality. A game weaker minds like to play in, when their logic, and reasoning ablity fails them.

Subject matter is king in any conversation, until one looses the upper hand on topic. then spelling becomes an issue, then puncituation, then grammer, then font, then method of quoting, then an endless supply of hoop jumping all in an effort to red herring themselves away from a topic these people can not otherwise pray to have the last word in.

It's real simple.

Those who can do.

Those who can't only teach.

Those who can't teach, grade papers. (Check for spelling)

[The Grand Nudger]

I still say evolution is overrated if evolved creatures waste their time with drich.

LOL, the ignorant monkeys are a liability for the slightly less ignorant monkeys, so there's a compulsion to bring them in line. Thankfully, we've moved away from having our very survival depend upon this -particular- monkey, but the compulsion persists.

You running those numbers Drich? We could use your billing software to do the math.

[h4ym4n]

Dirch here is a question since you believe in creation which came first the chicken or the egg?

That's an easy one.

The egg.

No egg, no chicken.

---

So where did the egg come from? what ever 'bird/lizzard/crap theory' the chicken evolved from.

Do you now see why your peers are so paniced about this theory of mine? I allows a believer access to an unmolested account of creation and whatever science is currently serving up in the realm of '

---

So god said let there be chickens and an egg appears?

Did god also say, don't let chicken remains/fossils be found amongst the dinosaur fossils Drich?

[Anomalocaris]

Never attribute to dyslexia what can be attributed to a idiot's pride in idiocy. A dyslexic person can work around the problem. Drich senses any value he could imagine himself to possess rest entirely in the idiocy that prevents him from seeing his own worthlessness, so he abhors working around his idiocy because that would threaten to deflate his delusional perception of his own value.

Actually Drich see, his spelling as a trivial point, a needless formality. A game weaker minds like to play in, when their logic, and reasoning ablity fails them.

Subject matter is king in any conversation, until one looses the upper hand on topic. then spelling becomes an issue, then puncituation, then grammer, then font, then method of quoting, then an endless supply of hoop jumping all in an effort to red herring themselves away from a topic these people can not otherwise pray to have the last word in.

It's real simple.

Those who can do.

Those who can't only teach.

Those who can't teach, grade papers. (Check for spelling)

Those who can't spell, do flunk out to flip burgers, become biblical christians on the side, and compare themselves to "Enistein", "Eddison" and "Churchhill".

[Drich]

Sooo... What? You think the chicken came first?

No, I think you're a dismissive arsehole with no idea what you're talking about and an ego as wide as your unwillingness to do even the smallest bit of research into the topics you've decided you know about.

As to the chicken and the egg topic, it's a continuum, not a simplistic single generation problem. The realistic answer, given within the context of how evolution actually works, is that the chicken and the egg came first, or rather neither did, over a band of time on the avian reproductive timeline comprising multiple generations, each one more chicken-like than the last.

But, you know, that kind of answer requires a little bit of research into biology, so it's not surprising that you didn't know it. I await your baseless, arrogant roflol emote, though. That won't be predictable at all.

Uhhh. No.

At some point a non-chicken (albeit very close to a chicken) layed an egg that contained the first full on chicken.

I completely get this is a very slow and deliberate process that makes tiny changes over vast periods of time. However like it or not The chicken was a mutation from it's former 'choke-un' counterpart (This is what I'm calling whatever preceeded the chicken in the evolutionary chain) As some point the Choke-un laid an egg, and that egg contained what 'science' in all it's wisdom would identify as a chicken.

I also get that you don't like how flipant I am with your version of God/science. to which I say, so what. How is this any different then what you all say/Do against My God?

If I am wrong, then like I do with you provide BCV via one of your bibles and show me where I am wrong. otherwise pound sand, because theoritical science is barly science at all, and the fact that you all are so quick to marry it to real pratical science should speak volumes to you on it's legitimacy.

[Anomalocaris]

I also get that you don't like how flipant I am with your version of God/science. to which I say, so what. How is this any different then what you all say/Do against My God?

Uh, there is concrete, objective, verifiable evidence for science; there is only support for your god in your chicken shit dyslexic head with its "obversion" to rules of evidence, falsifiability and repeatability. Drich

You flipped for the wrong side, your flippant burger flipper of an “enistein”.

[Faith No More]

I get all tingly inside when Drich uses words like theoritical.