Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 12, 2024, 1:28 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Christian "faith" vs. plain "faith"
#11
RE: Christian "faith" vs. plain "faith"
(March 25, 2015 at 8:40 pm)Pyrrho Wrote:

I'm surprised that the dictionary definitions in your quote all suggest that faith is either 0% or 100%. It would be very common to say "I don't have too much faith in political promises", or "how much faith do you have in Social Security?" Those statement imply that faith can range between 0% and 100%. Maybe I'm weird, but I would use "faith" in those sentences commonly.
Reply
#12
RE: Christian "faith" vs. plain "faith"
(March 25, 2015 at 8:58 pm)Pandæmonium Wrote:
(March 25, 2015 at 8:54 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: A man's word used to mean something. There was a time where you would take the word of a "gentleman" without second thought.

Your cynicism is more a reflection of the times you live in.

ROFLOL

Again, you've got a given illness and some guy comes up to you and offers you a miracle panacea that will cure your illness if you just give him some money.

just to confirm that you'd take him at his word right? Just open up your wallet and give him everything you've got.

Skepticism =/= cynicism

The times I live in huggy are about 1000 years ahead of the times you live in, apparently.

Shit, just when you think you've read the stupidest things people believe. Wow.
Where did I indicate specifically what I believe? Do I choose to take God at his word? Yes.

"Let God be true, but every man a liar;" - Romans 3:4

There is a difference between believing God and some random man off the street. I would even go as far as saying it is no longer faith in my case, I have SEEN the evidence, there isn't the slightest doubt in my mind that God exists.
Whether you believe that or not makes no difference to me.

(March 25, 2015 at 9:00 pm)Faith No More Wrote: Huggy's crossing into Poe territory...
How exactly?
Reply
#13
RE: Christian "faith" vs. plain "faith"
Another question for Christians: faith is obviously not a binary value (0% or 100%). Christians might say that a certain saint "had great faith". The parable of the mustard seed suggests that faith grows.

So how can faith in Christian theology determine a person's fate after death (heaven or hell)? Nobody has 0% faith and nobody has 100% faith IMO. Everybody is inbetween somewhere. What do you suppose the cut-off level is for faith? How fair would it be to send one person to hell for having 49.9% faith and the other person to heaven for having 50% faith?
Reply
#14
RE: Christian "faith" vs. plain "faith"
[Image: 1275389857_naked-gun-facepalm.gif]
Love atheistforums.org? Consider becoming a patreon and helping towards our server costs.

[Image: 146748944129044_zpsomrzyn3d.gif]
Reply
#15
RE: Christian "faith" vs. plain "faith"
(March 25, 2015 at 8:17 pm)watchamadoodle Wrote: Any opinions? I'm especially curious if Christians agree that "faith" means "confidence" and that "confidence" must have a cause - whether the cause is seeing Moses split the Red Sea or simply being indoctrinated as a child.
The Bible can be interpreted to imply that the term "faith" is used in the traditional sense of trust or confidence. In the OT god is an active person who constantly intervenes directly in the affairs of humanity in order to show that he is capable of exercising great power. So when he says that he will do something, those who had seen his power had faith that he would accomplish it and no one could stop him. In the NT Jesus is a bit more circumspect but still performs powerful acts and shows the ability to read thoughts and intent. So his promises would also seem more trustworthy.

He turns it all around by telling the doubting Thomas that 'blessed are those who do not see, yet believe.' But even that could imply that after having seen some of Jesus' miracles or hearing of them from people he trusted, he should have known that Jesus could rise from the dead and should have been willing to accept the word of his contemporaries.

But there is no way to extend that to the current day, since we don't really know who wrote the books of the Bible. And it's an underwhelming piece of work, not the sort of thing you'd expect from a magnificent intellect, but very similar to so many other ancient myths and legends. Faith in the Bible or the beings it references is not based on a reasonable trust or confidence, which is why that kind of faith is often referred to as blind faith. There is no basis on which to trust what it says, so it's effectively taken at face value. Which is why there have been --and still are-- so many different gods and religions throughout human history.
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."

-Stephen Jay Gould
Reply
#16
RE: Christian "faith" vs. plain "faith"
(March 25, 2015 at 9:17 pm)watchamadoodle Wrote: Another question for Christians: faith is obviously not a binary value (0% or 100%). Christians might say that a certain saint "had great faith". The parable of the mustard seed suggests that faith grows.

So how can faith in Christian theology determine a person's fate after death (heaven or hell)? Nobody has 0% faith and nobody has 100% faith IMO. Everybody is inbetween somewhere. What do you suppose the cut-off level is for faith? How fair would it be to send one person to hell for having 49.9% faith and the other person to heaven for having 50% faith?
There are degrees of faith. A biblical example would be Jesus being persuaded to go to someone house in order to heal them. Meanwhile a Roman centurion who realized the concept of authority, knew Jesus could Just "order" the healing to be done, no need to actually go to the house. Hence why his faith was greater.
Reply
#17
RE: Christian "faith" vs. plain "faith"
An atheist's "faith" is really just a verbal shorthand for the confidence in something based on a combination of factors: past results in similar situations, the inherent qualities of the thing/event itself, probability, and perhaps even the character of the people involved. It's incompatible with the idea of blind faith, which is why it's so tiring when theists try the "your faith in science or whatever is just like my faith in god!" thing. No, it's not. Not even close.
"I was thirsty for everything, but blood wasn't my style" - Live, "Voodoo Lady"
Reply
#18
RE: Christian "faith" vs. plain "faith"
(March 25, 2015 at 9:11 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: There is a difference between believing God and some random man off the street. I would even go as far as saying it is no longer faith in my case, I have SEEN the evidence, there isn't the slightest doubt in my mind that God exists.
Whether you believe that or not makes no difference to me.

Really, you've seen it. Then you should easily be able to convey that evidence to us, right?
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.
Reply
#19
RE: Christian "faith" vs. plain "faith"
(March 25, 2015 at 9:33 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: An atheist's "faith" is really just a verbal shorthand for the confidence in something based on a combination of factors: past results in similar situations, the inherent qualities of the thing/event itself, probability, and perhaps even the character of the people involved. It's incompatible with the idea of blind faith, which is why it's so tiring when theists try the "your faith in science or whatever is just like my faith in god!" thing. No, it's not. Not even close.
Is blind faith actually possible? IMO, Christians have faith for bad reasons, but they do not have blind faith. Nobody can simply choose to have blind faith as many Christians claim.

However there is a difference with Christian faith. When I was little, my father told me that if I could put salt on a bird's tail then he couldn't fly away and I could keep him as a pet. I remember being very incredulous, but I believed my father and tried hunting birds with a salt shaker. Smile That was just as silly as believing in Christianity, but there was one difference - if I had ever successfully salted a bird's tail and he flew away, then I would have falsified the claim. It is much harder to falsify many Christian claims, because the Lord works in mysterious ways.
Reply
#20
RE: Christian "faith" vs. plain "faith"
(March 25, 2015 at 9:11 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: There is a difference between believing God and some random man off the street.

So you wouldn't just take the random man off the street at his word? Even if he seems appropriately gentlemanly? Then why on earth are you castigating science for doing the same?

Not that I believe for a second that it's possible to please you, on this subject; if science really did start taking people randomly at their word and not testing things, I have no doubt you'd turn that into an "aha!" moment too and accuse the scientific community of just making things up based on the last thing they were told. Let's not pretend that this is some consistent position you've taken up.

What's particularly infuriating is that evolution deniers like you are the ones most likely to leap on all the supposed evolution "frauds" whenever you need to, yet you'll take the rigorous testing needed to root out any such frauds and turn that into a weakness too. But if the scientific tests started yielding positive evidence for your god, I bet you'd be trumpeting the repeatability and consistency of those results from the rooftops.

Quote: I would even go as far as saying it is no longer faith in my case, I have SEEN the evidence, there isn't the slightest doubt in my mind that God exists.
Whether you believe that or not makes no difference to me.

Didn't you just get through saying that needing evidence for a thing bespeaks a lack of confidence? Thinking
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee

Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  How can a Christian reject part of the Bible and still call themselves a Christian? KUSA 371 100858 May 3, 2020 at 1:04 am
Last Post: Paleophyte
  In Christianity, blind faith is good faith Rwandrall 43 17028 May 16, 2015 at 1:39 pm
Last Post: Nope
  Why i'm not a Christian and why i left the faith as a child. dyresand 20 6379 November 8, 2014 at 10:01 am
Last Post: dyresand
  Yet more christian logic: christian sues for not being given a job she refuses to do. Esquilax 21 8007 July 20, 2014 at 2:48 pm
Last Post: ThomM
  Christian Faith Requires Accepting Evolution Whateverist 70 23606 July 29, 2013 at 10:03 am
Last Post: Bad Writer
  Relationships - Christian and non-Christian way Ciel_Rouge 6 6683 August 21, 2012 at 12:57 pm
Last Post: frankiej
  Do You Think Christians Are Crazy and Delusional Or Just Plain Thick? Xavier 43 18809 February 3, 2012 at 7:31 am
Last Post: Zen Badger



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)