RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
April 4, 2015 at 6:54 am
Are the staff gray-outs a late April Fool's joke or a glitch in the system?
Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
|
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
April 4, 2015 at 6:54 am
Are the staff gray-outs a late April Fool's joke or a glitch in the system?
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
April 4, 2015 at 7:37 am
(This post was last modified: April 4, 2015 at 7:43 am by robvalue.)
They are on strike. Check out the last few pages of this thread for more info.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists. Index of useful threads and discussions Index of my best videos Quickstart guide to the forum RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
April 4, 2015 at 7:43 am
(April 4, 2015 at 6:54 am)alpha male Wrote: Are the staff gray-outs a late April Fool's joke or a glitch in the system? It's strike. We are tired of all the bitching and moaning we get from users, just because we are doing what we are supposed to do. Warn a theist = biased staff. Warn an atheist= biased staff. What we demand is very simple: that the community we serve, at least have the decency to make reasonable criticism to offer to our actions. Not just smear our work because of a warning or a thread lock. Or at least ask us the reason of our action, instead of jumping to conclusions. RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
April 4, 2015 at 7:53 am
There's been a lot of bummage around here as of late, so waking up to JennyA and whateverist being back is some really exciting good news!! So glad to have you guys back.
I can't remember where this verse is from, I think it got removed from canon:
"I don't hang around with mostly men because I'm gay. It's because men are better than women. Better trained, better equipped...better. Just better! I'm not gay." For context, this is the previous verse: "Hi Jesus" -robvalue RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
April 4, 2015 at 7:54 am
(This post was last modified: April 4, 2015 at 7:55 am by John V.)
(April 4, 2015 at 7:43 am)LastPoet Wrote:It's apparently bullshit, as you're still able to post.(April 4, 2015 at 6:54 am)alpha male Wrote: Are the staff gray-outs a late April Fool's joke or a glitch in the system? Quote:We are tired of all the bitching and moaning we get from users, just because we are doing what we are supposed to do. Warn a theist = biased staff. Warn an atheist= biased staff.But who decides what's reasonable criticism and what's a smear? Oh yeah, the staff. RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
April 4, 2015 at 8:26 am
When someone is going for decent criticism, they use a proper thread on this same subforum with a reasonable argument. Certainly not what's been happening.
Perhaps its time for a change. It can be the case for me. Strike means I am not doing anything regarding staff duties ATM. The best way I could find was to use a striked out group. Also it would be funny to have mods display as banned as a symbol. None of my fellow strikees were forced into it, but the idea did turn viral amongst my colleages. It turns out that we the staff are human, capable of feeling and bound to error. What is asked is: can people please ask before making assumptions? Please? RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
April 4, 2015 at 9:14 am
Yes, we can still post. That's because we're not banned. The grey-out in this instance is just the chosen method of indicating our protest.
What we have elected to do, on a purely opt-in basis, is to suspend our moderation duties for the most part.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
April 4, 2015 at 9:17 am
(April 4, 2015 at 9:14 am)Stimbo Wrote: Yes, we can still post. That's because we're not banned. The grey-out in this instance is just the chosen method of indicating our protest. Oh noes! hock: We'll have human sacrifice...dogs and cats living together...mass hysteria! Or not. RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
April 4, 2015 at 9:21 am
Well, we'll see what happens when we're swimming in a cesspool of spam.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
April 4, 2015 at 9:26 am
(April 4, 2015 at 7:43 am)LastPoet Wrote: What we demand is very simple: that the community we serve, at least have the decency to make reasonable criticism to offer to our actions. Not just smear our work because of a warning or a thread lock. Or at least ask us the reason of our action, instead of jumping to conclusions.But the community is not a monolith. And the people most likely to get action taken against them are usually going to be the types who gripe and complain the most. The community as a whole won't be able to enter into any sort of agreement with the staff (aside from the Rules), which means that those of us who play nice (the majority IMO) are at the mercy of those who realize that it's easy to rock the boat with only mild repercussions. Because your system is pretty good --requiring staff discussion and votes before action is taken-- I think the better approach is to display confidence in the system and shrug off criticism. Otherwise you'll be fighting constant battles with internet lawyers. And you are under no obligation to do that. You have a system that works. Use it and don't worry about the people who will complain. There will always be people who complain.
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."
-Stephen Jay Gould |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|