|
math tard, Help
|
Where is the flaw in this? Think it is division by 0 but not sure.
x=y x squared = xy x squared-y squared = xy-y squared (x+y) (x-y)=y(x-y) (x+y) (x-y)/(x-y)=y(x-y)/(x-y) (x+y)=y
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental.
Take it one step further.
x+y-y=y-y x=0
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<--- 
One of your terms = 0, and then you attempt to divide by it.
Even without numbers and just using symbols, of something =0 and then you divvy by it, things go kerfloouy. The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it.
Yeah, the y(x-y) = yx-y² = y²-y² = 0
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
The problem is if x and y = 1. I'm guessing any other integer also. Help the math tard. Thanks.
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental.
It doesn't matter what the value of x and y are. In step three, you have 0=0 every time.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<--- RE: math tard, Help
June 27, 2015 at 11:34 pm
(This post was last modified: June 28, 2015 at 12:15 am by brewer.)
(June 27, 2015 at 11:17 pm)SteelCurtain Wrote: It doesn't matter what the value of x and y are. In step three, you have 0=0 every time. Thanks to you all, may be not as stupid as I thought. Sorry, not PC, not as mentally challenged.
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental.
Hehe yeah, it's a neat trick. Dividing by zero is the maths equivalent of a logical fallacy.
Here's the maths equivalent of presuppositional apologetics: x=1 Therefor x=1 Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists. Index of useful threads and discussions Index of my best videos Quickstart guide to the forum 
In my experience with math, if you hit your head on the wall a sufficient amount times, the problem will solve itself
RE: math tard, Help
June 28, 2015 at 2:50 am
(This post was last modified: June 28, 2015 at 2:51 am by robvalue.)
Do it enough times and it solves all your problems, mathematical or otherwise!
I love maths. I used to be a maths teacher. Going back even further, I used to ask for maths homework when I was very young. I've got great satisfaction from helping people who really believed they "can't do maths" to reach a new understanding of it 
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists. Index of useful threads and discussions Index of my best videos Quickstart guide to the forum |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
