Posts: 15755
Threads: 194
Joined: May 15, 2009
Reputation:
145
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 24, 2015 at 12:42 pm
(This post was last modified: January 24, 2015 at 12:44 pm by Violet.)
(January 24, 2015 at 12:38 pm)c172 Wrote: Ooh, Fidel takes a whack in under 2 min! Rex, step up your game.
Think Moros Synackaon hit a couple seconder once. It's only a game so long as we're ignorant of all the players~ 
(January 24, 2015 at 12:42 pm)vorlon13 Wrote: I am an equal opportunity dispenser of blow jobs to hairy, burly, manly men, regards of their sexual (dis)orientation.
Cool cool. So... are you effeminate? 
Please give me a home where cloud buffalo roam
Where the dear and the strangers can play
Where sometimes is heard a discouraging word
But the skies are not stormy all day
Posts: 30129
Threads: 304
Joined: April 18, 2014
Reputation:
92
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 24, 2015 at 12:46 pm
I'm a big strapping guy too.
You'd never mistake me for a twink.
Posts: 15755
Threads: 194
Joined: May 15, 2009
Reputation:
145
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 24, 2015 at 12:48 pm
(January 24, 2015 at 12:46 pm)vorlon13 Wrote: I'm a big strapping guy too.
You'd never mistake me for a twink.
Damn... there goes my prevailing theory. 
All these years later, and I'm still trying to figure out what made me a hot item to supposedly straight men. 'Availability' alone just seems so... sexist. 
Please give me a home where cloud buffalo roam
Where the dear and the strangers can play
Where sometimes is heard a discouraging word
But the skies are not stormy all day
Posts: 6990
Threads: 89
Joined: January 6, 2012
Reputation:
104
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 24, 2015 at 12:53 pm
(January 24, 2015 at 12:38 pm)c172 Wrote: Ooh, Fidel takes a whack in under 2 min! Rex, step up your game.
I was immediately suspicous for various reasons. Dar's warning and the IP match sealed the deal.
Posts: 7140
Threads: 12
Joined: March 14, 2013
Reputation:
72
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 24, 2015 at 1:06 pm
(January 24, 2015 at 8:25 am)downbeatplumb Wrote: If you let a gay guy blow you are you really straight?
Just have him turn his head sideways.
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."
-Stephen Jay Gould
Posts: 349
Threads: 1
Joined: January 7, 2015
Reputation:
5
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 24, 2015 at 5:12 pm
(January 24, 2015 at 8:25 am)downbeatplumb Wrote: (January 24, 2015 at 2:30 am)404NotFound Wrote: I own a bar in real life so I'm fairly immune to drama, but I have to say this thread is almost as entertaining as when a gay bartender was busted giving a blowjob to a straight guy. Unfortunately for the straight guy, his wife busted him. 
If you let a gay guy blow you are you really straight?
Of course not, according to the wife, the fellatee was a victim of being over-served and possibly roofied. Denial anybody? Personally, she may have taken that obscure Christian passage literally: the one about swallowing masculine seed is akin to cannibalism.
“Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?”
Epicurus
Posts: 30129
Threads: 304
Joined: April 18, 2014
Reputation:
92
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 24, 2015 at 5:45 pm
And transubstantiation isn't
Posts: 3117
Threads: 16
Joined: September 17, 2012
Reputation:
35
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 24, 2015 at 5:56 pm
(January 24, 2015 at 5:45 pm)vorlon13 Wrote: And transubstantiation isn't
Well, transubstantiation isn't literal consumption of Jesus's body and blood... except that it is... but it also isn't. Though it is. It both simultaneously is and is not. Seriously though, when I asked a priest (a long time ago) why transubstantiation wasn't considered merely symbolic (even though it clearly isn't literal flesh and blood), he said that it is literal... and also not literal.
P (1) Transubstantiation is literally consumption of flesh and blood.
P (2) Transubstantiation is not literally consumption of flesh and blood.
(3) Therefore, checkmate athesits!
John Adams Wrote:The Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion.
Posts: 30129
Threads: 304
Joined: April 18, 2014
Reputation:
92
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 24, 2015 at 5:59 pm
Medically, a friend of mine still has celiac reaction to the wafer, so at least in his gut it is still flour and not blood, sinew, bone, tooth, fat and muscle.
Course, he might be an apostate of some kind . . .
Posts: 2962
Threads: 44
Joined: March 22, 2013
Reputation:
39
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 24, 2015 at 6:02 pm
Soooo,
If you're a Catholic vegan, can you still chow down on Jesus' body and blood?
|
![[Image: 146748944129044_zpsomrzyn3d.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i629.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fuu13%2FRXM843%2F146748944129044_zpsomrzyn3d.gif)
