DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[downbeatplumb]

I think the Bible is inerrant.  I think a good commentary can explain problem texts, like the Matthew Henry commentary and others.

Really!
Have you read it?

I mean Leviticus WTF is that about?

[Amarok]

It's a great prophecy!

No it isn't

[Gwaithmir]

---

References have already been posted here proving you wrong. Groundless assertions and denials on your part do not constitute evidence or rational arguments. You're not very good at this. Get an education, numb nuts.

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Biblical_p...prophecies

There are good commentaries explaining this prophecy (Tyre prophecy).  Matthew Henry,....  Many see this as an amazing prophecy.

"With the hoofs of his horses shall he tread down all thy streets: he shall slay thy people by the sword, and thy strong garrisons shall go down to the ground. And they shall make a spoil of thy riches, and make a prey of thy merchandise: and they shall break down thy walls, and destroy thy pleasant houses: and they shall lay thy stones and thy timber and thy dust in the midst of the water. And I will cause the noise of thy songs to cease; and the sound of thy harps shall be no more heard. And I will make thee like the top of a rock: thou shalt be a place to spread nets upon; thou shalt be built no more: for I the LORD have spoken it, saith the Lord GOD." (Ezekiel 26:1-5)

Go ahead and read the entire prophecy. Tyre was supposed to be utterly destroyed, never to be rebuilt again. It never happened. Nebuchadnezzar had to give up after a siege lasting eight years. Tyre has been an inhabited city up to the present day. You're wrong again, numb nuts. How much more thoroughly do you have to have your face rubbed in it before you realize that all you're doing here is making a total ass of yourself? Get an education!

[Amarok]

---

There are good commentaries explaining this prophecy (Tyre prophecy).  Matthew Henry,....  Many see this as an amazing prophecy.

"With the hoofs of his horses shall he tread down all thy streets: he shall slay thy people by the sword, and thy strong garrisons shall go down to the ground. And they shall make a spoil of thy riches, and make a prey of thy merchandise: and they shall break down thy walls, and destroy thy pleasant houses: and they shall lay thy stones and thy timber and thy dust in the midst of the water. And I will cause the noise of thy songs to cease; and the sound of thy harps shall be no more heard. And I will make thee like the top of a rock: thou shalt be a place to spread nets upon; thou shalt be built no more: for I the LORD have spoken it, saith the Lord GOD." (Ezekiel 26:1-5)

Go ahead and read the entire prophecy. Tyre was supposed to be utterly destroyed, never to be rebuilt again. It never happened. Nebuchadnezzar had to give up after a siege lasting eight years. Tyre has been an inhabited city up to the present day. You're wrong again, numb nuts. How much more thoroughly do you have to have your face rubbed in it before you realize that all you're doing here is making a total ass of yourself? Get an education!

His excuse is there are still ruins

[Gwaithmir]

"With the hoofs of his horses shall he tread down all thy streets: he shall slay thy people by the sword, and thy strong garrisons shall go down to the ground. And they shall make a spoil of thy riches, and make a prey of thy merchandise: and they shall break down thy walls, and destroy thy pleasant houses: and they shall lay thy stones and thy timber and thy dust in the midst of the water. And I will cause the noise of thy songs to cease; and the sound of thy harps shall be no more heard. And I will make thee like the top of a rock: thou shalt be a place to spread nets upon; thou shalt be built no more: for I the LORD have spoken it, saith the Lord GOD." (Ezekiel 26:1-5)

Go ahead and read the entire prophecy. Tyre was supposed to be utterly destroyed, never to be rebuilt again. It never happened. Nebuchadnezzar had to give up after a siege lasting eight years. Tyre has been an inhabited city up to the present day. You're wrong again, numb nuts. How much more thoroughly do you have to have your face rubbed in it before you realize that all you're doing here is making a total ass of yourself? Get an education!

His excuse is there are still ruins

[Amarok]

His excuse is there are still ruins

Yup nutty

[Abaddon_ire]

I think the Bible is inerrant.  I think a good commentary can explain problem texts, like the Matthew Henry commentary and others.

Really!
Have you read it?

I mean Leviticus WTF is that about?

Of course CDF has not read the bible himself. Instead, he relies on what some wingnuts TELL him that the bible says.

For example, out of the 613 mitzvot, he thinks that jebus endorsed the ten commandment only and thus those are only the laws which apply under the "new covenant". He believes this because he has been instructed to believe this, not because he actually ever read the bible cover to cover.

Had he actually read the risible tome he would know that jebus only ever endorsed FIVE of the ten commandments and ignored the rest. Had he read the bible he would know which those were. Had he read the bible, he would know that jebus added two more that were not part of the ten but rather plagiarised from surrounding, pre-existing cultures.

Now, because I have read the entire bible, I know which 5 jebus included and which 5 jebus excluded.

Because CDF has not read the bible, but instead relied on others to TELL him what the bible says, he has no clue which.

Thus we know that CDF has not read the bible.

[CDF47]

Really!
Have you read it?

I mean Leviticus WTF is that about?

Of course CDF has not read the bible himself. Instead, he relies on what some wingnuts TELL him that the bible says.

For example, out of the 613 mitzvot, he thinks that jebus endorsed the ten commandment only and thus those are only the laws which apply under the "new covenant". He believes this because he has been instructed to believe this, not because he actually ever read the bible cover to cover.

Had he actually read the risible tome he would know that jebus only ever endorsed FIVE of the ten commandments and ignored the rest. Had he read the bible he would know which those were. Had he read the bible, he would know that jebus added two more that were not part of the ten but rather plagiarised from surrounding, pre-existing cultures.

Now, because I have read the entire bible, I know which 5 jebus included and which 5 jebus excluded.

Because CDF has not read the bible, but instead relied on others to TELL him what the bible says, he has no clue which.

Thus we know that CDF has not read the bible.

I've read the Bible cover to cover and studied it extensively.

---

---

There are good commentaries explaining this prophecy (Tyre prophecy).  Matthew Henry,....  Many see this as an amazing prophecy.

"With the hoofs of his horses shall he tread down all thy streets: he shall slay thy people by the sword, and thy strong garrisons shall go down to the ground. And they shall make a spoil of thy riches, and make a prey of thy merchandise: and they shall break down thy walls, and destroy thy pleasant houses: and they shall lay thy stones and thy timber and thy dust in the midst of the water. And I will cause the noise of thy songs to cease; and the sound of thy harps shall be no more heard. And I will make thee like the top of a rock: thou shalt be a place to spread nets upon; thou shalt be built no more: for I the LORD have spoken it, saith the Lord GOD." (Ezekiel 26:1-5)

Go ahead and read the entire prophecy. Tyre was supposed to be utterly destroyed, never to be rebuilt again. It never happened. Nebuchadnezzar had to give up after a siege lasting eight years. Tyre has been an inhabited city up to the present day. You're wrong again, numb nuts. How much more thoroughly do you have to have your face rubbed in it before you realize that all you're doing here is making a total ass of yourself? Get an education!

The Tyre prophecy is not what makes a difference here.

[Abaddon_ire]

Of course CDF has not read the bible himself. Instead, he relies on what some wingnuts TELL him that the bible says.

For example, out of the 613 mitzvot, he thinks that jebus endorsed the ten commandment only and thus those are only the laws which apply under the "new covenant". He believes this because he has been instructed to believe this, not because he actually ever read the bible cover to cover.

Had he actually read the risible tome he would know that jebus only ever endorsed FIVE of the ten commandments and ignored the rest. Had he read the bible he would know which those were. Had he read the bible, he would know that jebus added two more that were not part of the ten but rather plagiarised from surrounding, pre-existing cultures.

Now, because I have read the entire bible, I know which 5 jebus included and which 5 jebus excluded.

Because CDF has not read the bible, but instead relied on others to TELL him what the bible says, he has no clue which.

Thus we know that CDF has not read the bible.

I've read the Bible cover to cover and studied it extensively.

No, you obviously have not. I know this because I actually have done so and you have clearly merely cherry picked, or been handed selected passages by somebody else.

This becomes clear by a careful consideration of which parts you quote and which parts you pretend aren't even in the book at all by means of simply ignoring them.

It is demonstrated by the way in which you rehash centuries old arguments and apologetics as though they were shiny new arguments all your own but the simple fact is that they are not your arguments. They were simply foisted on you by others or you stole them from others. Either way we have seen them before and they are long since discredited.

You are so dishonest that you have even resorted to the infamously bovine tactic of "god-did-it" even to the point of using those exact three words.

[downbeatplumb]

[quote='Abaddon_ire' pid='1908360' dateline='1557527965']
Of course CDF has not read the bible himself. Instead, he relies on what some wingnuts TELL him that the bible says.

For example, out of the 613 mitzvot, he thinks that jebus endorsed the ten commandment only and thus those are only the laws which apply under the "new covenant". He believes this because he has been instructed to believe this, not because he actually ever read the bible cover to cover.

Had he actually read the risible tome he would know that jebus only ever endorsed FIVE of the ten commandments and ignored the rest. Had he read the bible he would know which those were. Had he read the bible, he would know that jebus added two more that were not part of the ten but rather plagiarised from surrounding, pre-existing cultures.

Now, because I have read the entire bible, I know which 5 jebus included and which 5 jebus excluded.

Because CDF has not read the bible, but instead relied on others to TELL him what the bible says, he has no clue which.

Thus we know that CDF has not read the bible.

I've read the Bible cover to cover and studied it extensively.

---

I doubt you have.

Do you sacrifice birds to let your wife back in the house after she has finished being unpure each month?
Do you eat pig coz you shouldn't?
how do you feel about tattoos?
Or wearing mixed fabrics?

If you don't act as the bible says on this then is the bible really the book for you?