(July 24, 2015 at 10:05 pm)Chas Wrote:modern snakes do not have legs.. Of course not. Even the Genesis account tells us why. Even so, in the nature.com article the snake with legs was still identified as a 'snake' first, with the qualifier 'with legs.' So Despie how you cheese might want to split 'hairs,' Genesis AND the Nature.com article are speaking of the same animal.(July 24, 2015 at 5:52 pm)Drich Wrote: All one need do is search for 'snake legs.'
http://atheistforums.org/search.php?acti...desc&uid=0
Here is a page of examples:
http://atheistforums.org/thread-29989-pa...snake+legs (This is a good one as several different people are making fun of the idea that snakes have legs.)
since we are not allowed to call people out here is a link to the search I did.
If you take 10 mins you will find people saying 'Snakes do not have legs.'
The ancestors of snakes appear to have had legs. Modern snakes do not.
And your links don't support your contention. Try again.
As far as 'my links' are concern I disagree. So now your turn. You Try again.
