RE: What would you consider to be evidence for God?
August 3, 2015 at 12:08 pm
(This post was last modified: August 3, 2015 at 12:13 pm by robvalue.)
Yeah, the resurrection...
Are you aware that the resurrection account is widely considered to be a forgery? As in, not even a part of the original story which itself was a hearsay account written decades later?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_16
Even if it wasn't a forgery and "Mark" thought it important enough to include in his account, why would you believe it actually happened over any other mythical tale of magic happenings? (Compare and contrast to Abraham Lincoln, Vampire Hunter.)
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1611224/
The scholars disagree on the resurrection in exact correlation to whether they are Christian or not; that is, whether they already presuppose it.
Are you aware that the resurrection account is widely considered to be a forgery? As in, not even a part of the original story which itself was a hearsay account written decades later?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_16
Even if it wasn't a forgery and "Mark" thought it important enough to include in his account, why would you believe it actually happened over any other mythical tale of magic happenings? (Compare and contrast to Abraham Lincoln, Vampire Hunter.)
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1611224/
The scholars disagree on the resurrection in exact correlation to whether they are Christian or not; that is, whether they already presuppose it.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum