RE: What would you consider to be evidence for God?
August 3, 2015 at 2:35 pm
(This post was last modified: August 3, 2015 at 2:37 pm by Kingpin.)
(August 3, 2015 at 2:05 pm)robvalue Wrote: I used it as an example. It's well known, don't take my word for it. I take it you weren't aware of this then. Go look it up elsewhere!
I can't make any sense of the second paragraph... presupposes evolution? That is scientific fact, there is nothing to presuppose. You are comparing that to a hearsay account about an unprecedented supernatural occurance? Please tell me you can see you're clutching at straws there.
No no. My point was to not discount a conclusion based on a perceived (or even realized) presupposition. Presuppositions are inherent to look for coherent answers. Every hypothesis has a presupposition.
I was very aware of the additions to Mark's Gospel and how apparent it is to be added later and most Bible's today denote this addition. However, even removing verses 9-20 does nothing to dispel the resurrection. Ending it at 16:8 does not present an issue.
We are not made happy by what we acquire but by what we appreciate.
