Starting at Construct2-premise2, everything is wrong.
Believers "believe" god exist, that's why they are called "believers". That is, they accept the claim that god exists with(?) or without proof. If they did accept it "with" proof, and was able to provide said proof, then we wouldn't have so much problem to begin with. But the thing is, they accept it without proof, and then try to push this belief on others, also without any proof, and this is the root of the argument.
Believers "believe" god exist, that's why they are called "believers". That is, they accept the claim that god exists with(?) or without proof. If they did accept it "with" proof, and was able to provide said proof, then we wouldn't have so much problem to begin with. But the thing is, they accept it without proof, and then try to push this belief on others, also without any proof, and this is the root of the argument.
Quote:To know yet to think that one does not know is best; Not to know yet to think that one knows will lead to difficulty.
- Lau Tzu
Join me on atheistforums Slack

