OP - it's a really stupid argument and makes the usual mistakes.
How about "faith is pretending to know what you don't know"? If the believer had evidence, they'd trip all over themselves to present it. But they don't, so they can't, and must rely on trying tear down the atheist position. A position that is mere skepticism of claims without evidence. The same evidence we get for unicorns, sasquatches, little green men and the numerous gods we've invented over the centuries; and a similar position taken. Provide sufficient evidence and we'll talk.
How about "faith is pretending to know what you don't know"? If the believer had evidence, they'd trip all over themselves to present it. But they don't, so they can't, and must rely on trying tear down the atheist position. A position that is mere skepticism of claims without evidence. The same evidence we get for unicorns, sasquatches, little green men and the numerous gods we've invented over the centuries; and a similar position taken. Provide sufficient evidence and we'll talk.
