RE: Supreme Court Same Sex Marriage Argumet
August 7, 2015 at 12:27 pm
(This post was last modified: August 7, 2015 at 12:40 pm by Anima.)
(August 7, 2015 at 10:23 am)Yeauxleaux Wrote: I'm tired of explaining to these people that there is absolutely no danger of child marriage being legalised anytime soon. Relationships that would now be described as "pedophilia" used to be normal and commonplace across all cultures, but it is now strongly stigmatised and illegal in most cultures. That's the complete reverse of what has happened with attitudes to homosexuality.
HA HA!!! Did you really just write that? Seriously? You are trying to say something will never happened because what was stigmatized is not being stigmatized any more and what wasn't now is.
Doesn't this simply become a function of time? In the future they will say how primitive and backwards we were for not recognizing the equality of children and adults?
"Every man despises his father. And in so doing becomes his grandfather." - Plato
(August 7, 2015 at 10:23 am)Yeauxleaux Wrote: It's gone the other way. Why? Because people have woke up and noticed that there is a victim in one and no victim in the other, and they had it the wrong way round before.
HAAAAAA!!! HHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAA!!!!
And what is to keep them from "waking up" again and noticing the child wants to be in a relationship with the adult? Or are we going to act like there are no cases where a 10 year old wants to have sex with their 24 year old baby sitter or be married to them?
(I personally had a thing for my first grade teacher and my friends incredibly hot mom.)
https://youtu.be/dZLfasMPOU4
Since you are effectually arguing the willing cannot be a victim. So if the 10 year old and the 24 year old are willing what is the problem. There is no victim. Are you going to say the 10 year old may not act according to his desire or is unsure of what he desires?
